Thread: Old Vs New
-
06-09-2004, 03:07 PM #1
Old Vs New
The late greats vs the recent decent
Last edited by Prime; 06-09-2004 at 03:09 PM.
-
06-09-2004, 03:13 PM #2Respected Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- The Rink!!
- Posts
- 3,169
I give totally props for how large, hard, dry and separated the new age pros get. No one in the past was able to dial in like that. It is mainly do to drugs and advancements in nutrition but none the less it is unbelieveable. However with that said I much perfer the old school look.
-
06-09-2004, 03:15 PM #3Originally Posted by Shredz
-
06-09-2004, 03:18 PM #4
With the advancements in science and nutrition it would be inevitable for current BB'ers to surpass the late greats.
Here is Ronnie in a couple years
-
06-09-2004, 03:20 PM #5Respected Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- The Rink!!
- Posts
- 3,169
Originally Posted by mass junkie
Uhhh we don't hijack threads here!!!
-
06-09-2004, 03:24 PM #6
What about Arnie and Sergio utilising todays improved supplements. A few nitro-tech, cell-tech stacks and the guys could have looked like this............
-
06-09-2004, 03:28 PM #7Originally Posted by Prime
I think if Arnold was a current BBer he would dominate the sport.
-
06-09-2004, 03:40 PM #8
Ronnie has taken this to a whole new level!
But Dorian is still my favorite!
-
06-09-2004, 03:55 PM #9Respected Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- The Rink!!
- Posts
- 3,169
Originally Posted by Mighty Joe
-
06-09-2004, 03:57 PM #10
franco's got the best back in that group.
-
06-09-2004, 04:00 PM #11
I couldn't agree more... Arnold had the drive to be the best
it wouldn't matter who he competed against he would have
got his body to the level it needed to be to win...
Originally Posted by Maraxus
-
06-09-2004, 04:31 PM #12
you guys notice in that back shot it looks like arnold and ronnie are lookin at each other
-
06-09-2004, 04:33 PM #13
The first picture isnt fair to arnold, that is a pic of him in a gym, not in show form.
Last edited by Psychotron; 06-09-2004 at 04:36 PM.
-
06-09-2004, 04:35 PM #14
even so his legs have the best cuts outa the 4
-
06-09-2004, 04:40 PM #15
i personally think coleman looks silly.
-
06-09-2004, 04:48 PM #16
What about the way aesthetics has changed?
-
06-09-2004, 04:50 PM #17
Arms and the guys who have become famous due to them!
-
06-09-2004, 04:51 PM #18
Perhaps two of the greatest most aesthetic physiques never to win a Mr'O.
-
06-09-2004, 04:52 PM #19
2nd vs Last Mr O. Who's better??
-
06-09-2004, 07:26 PM #20
How do think Lou Ferringo would fit in the mix? At his height of 6'4" or 6'5" he also was amazing to be able to pack that kind of muscle on a tall frame!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
Yesterday, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS