Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 111

Thread: Van Halen

  1. #1
    BUYLONGTERM's Avatar
    BUYLONGTERM is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    8,067

    Van Halen

    WOW, I saw VH last night 2nd row. Unbelievable!!!! The boys are still kicking it! I saw them in 84, 88, and they still ROCK........

  2. #2
    Mart651's Avatar
    Mart651 is offline The Redneck Queen of the Lounge
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    chatt
    Posts
    3,142
    Quote Originally Posted by buylongterm
    WOW, I saw VH last night 2nd row. Unbelievable!!!! The boys are still kicking it! I saw them in 84, 88, and they still ROCK........
    You are realy showing your age bro.

  3. #3
    Lozgod's Avatar
    Lozgod is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Philly - Better than you
    Posts
    6,834
    David Lee Roth or Sammy hagar?

  4. #4
    Blown_SC is offline Retired Vet
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,917
    If it's not DLR, it isn't VanHalen ....

  5. #5
    Mart651's Avatar
    Mart651 is offline The Redneck Queen of the Lounge
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    chatt
    Posts
    3,142
    Quote Originally Posted by Blown_SC
    If it's not DLR, it isn't VanHalen ....

    How the hell would you know? Go change your diaper. Your **** is still yellow.

  6. #6
    Lozgod's Avatar
    Lozgod is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Philly - Better than you
    Posts
    6,834
    Quote Originally Posted by Blown_SC
    If it's not DLR, it isn't VanHalen ....
    I liked them both. I like 5150, that was a bad ass album. I was in the 7th grade when that was out, so I am not old like BLT for the record.

  7. #7
    BUYLONGTERM's Avatar
    BUYLONGTERM is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    8,067
    Quote Originally Posted by Martha
    You are realy showing your age bro.
    I know, but man, nothing better than seeing Eddy Van Halen's guitara solo. By far the best guitarist there is.

    It was with Sammy. I have seen David and yes, he is Van Halen, but Sammy is good.

  8. #8
    BUYLONGTERM's Avatar
    BUYLONGTERM is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    8,067
    Quote Originally Posted by Lozgod
    I liked them both. I like 5150, that was a bad ass album. I was in the 7th grade when that was out, so I am not old like BLT for the record.
    bastard!!!!

  9. #9
    Blown_SC is offline Retired Vet
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Martha
    How the hell would you know? Go change your diaper. Your **** is still yellow.
    Fack off... I still know what the hell I'm talkin about...
    Even though 1984, came out in 1983, 2 years b4 I was born

    Still, I listen to classic shyt as much if not more than new stuff...

    F*ck Sammy Haggar.

  10. #10
    Blown_SC is offline Retired Vet
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,917
    Quote Originally Posted by buylongterm
    I know, but man, nothing better than seeing Eddy Van Halen's guitara solo. By far the best guitarist there is.

    It was with Sammy. I have seen David and yes, he is Van Halen, but Sammy is good.
    OK cool, as long as we understand each other ...

    Eddie is simply amazing... yes...

  11. #11
    Pale Horse's Avatar
    Pale Horse is offline F.I.L.F.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ACLU headquarters
    Posts
    6,425
    Sammy rocks! I didn't know he was touring with them again!

  12. #12
    Lozgod's Avatar
    Lozgod is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Philly - Better than you
    Posts
    6,834
    Quote Originally Posted by Blown_SC
    Fack off... I still know what the hell I'm talkin about...
    Even though 1984, came out in 1983, 2 years b4 I was born

    Still, I listen to classic shyt as much if not more than new stuff...
    **** he called 1984 classic, now I do feel old.

  13. #13
    Pale Horse's Avatar
    Pale Horse is offline F.I.L.F.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ACLU headquarters
    Posts
    6,425
    Loz that just means that you are a classic, it's a compliment! LOL

  14. #14
    Blown_SC is offline Retired Vet
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Lozgod
    **** he called 1984 classic, now I do feel old.
    I've said this b4 in another thread...
    Pre-1985 is classic.. to me!

  15. #15
    Lozgod's Avatar
    Lozgod is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Philly - Better than you
    Posts
    6,834
    Quote Originally Posted by 1victor
    Loz that just means that you are a classic, it's a compliment! LOL
    I'm 30 I guess that makes me an antique.

  16. #16
    Lozgod's Avatar
    Lozgod is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Philly - Better than you
    Posts
    6,834
    You guys are gonna have me on Prozac in a minute because I am about to have a mid-life crisis.

    Getting old sucks, but its right aroud the corner fellas. It sneaks up on you out of the blue.

  17. #17
    Pale Horse's Avatar
    Pale Horse is offline F.I.L.F.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ACLU headquarters
    Posts
    6,425
    I'm 38, approaching fossil stage?

  18. #18
    medic23 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    231
    Appetite came out in 87 or 88 thats a classic

  19. #19
    Mart651's Avatar
    Mart651 is offline The Redneck Queen of the Lounge
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    chatt
    Posts
    3,142
    I think that a classic must be over 20 years old. So all of you young guys may need to start calling them old school not classics. Sort of like the last time Juggy was laid. Thats a classic.

  20. #20
    OGPackin's Avatar
    OGPackin is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    6,022
    David Lee Roth is Van Halen....Sammy isnt...JMHO

    OG

  21. #21
    medic23 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    231
    Quote Originally Posted by Martha
    I think that a classic must be over 20 years old. So all of you young guys may need to start calling them old school not classics. Sort of like the last time Juggy was laid. Thats a classic.
    I dont think you should have to put a set number on it like cars. I fyou do, 20 years is too long, 10 or 15 IMO

  22. #22
    Mart651's Avatar
    Mart651 is offline The Redneck Queen of the Lounge
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    chatt
    Posts
    3,142
    Quote Originally Posted by medic23
    I dont think you should have to put a set number on it like cars. I fyou do, 20 years is too long, 10 or 15 IMO

    When your old like me you try to use the classic term sparingly.

  23. #23
    medic23 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    231
    Quote Originally Posted by Martha
    When your old like me you try to use the classic term sparingly.
    I agree but it should be spared more for quality, not age. Bands like the Who and Rush dont deserve the calssic title while Springsteen and G N' R do

  24. #24
    Pale Horse's Avatar
    Pale Horse is offline F.I.L.F.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ACLU headquarters
    Posts
    6,425
    GNR is less a classic than the WHO or Springstein IMO. GNR rocks but not at the calssic stage yet. Crap they disintegrated after their first world tour.

  25. #25
    BUYLONGTERM's Avatar
    BUYLONGTERM is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    8,067
    I'm 36 and I feel like I'm 23! Age is a state of mind. Sammy is good. He brings a ton of Energy. Last year I saw the Sammy and David lee roth tour. I have to admit, Sammy blew him off the stage. Dave is getting old and really showing his age. I was almost embarrassed for him. I honestly paid 300.00 last night to see Eddy play! SIMPLY AMAZING!!!!

  26. #26
    Lozgod's Avatar
    Lozgod is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Philly - Better than you
    Posts
    6,834
    Quote Originally Posted by 1victor
    GNR is less a classic than the WHO or Springstein IMO. GNR rocks but not at the calssic stage yet. Crap they disintegrated after their first world tour.
    Thats a contraversial statement, G-N-R is classic bro. Paradise City, One In A Million, Rocket Queen, November Rain, I mean the list goes on, G-n-R is classic.

  27. #27
    medic23 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    231
    Quote Originally Posted by 1victor
    GNR is less a classic than the WHO or Springstein IMO. GNR rocks but not at the calssic stage yet. Crap they disintegrated after their first world tour.
    I said Springstein is a clssic, one of my favs but the Who sux IMO. And dont get me started on Rush.

  28. #28
    BUYLONGTERM's Avatar
    BUYLONGTERM is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    8,067
    Quote Originally Posted by medic23
    I said Springstein is a clssic, one of my favs but the Who sux IMO. And dont get me started on Rush.
    The WHO is incredible!!!! I've seen them several times and they blow me away!!! and Rush in the day was incredible as well. Nothing like seeing Neil Peart do a drum solo.

  29. #29
    medic23 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    231
    I cant stand Rush. His voice is the only one more annoying than the dave mathews band. And while I know most will disagree with me about the WHo, I stick by my story.

  30. #30
    Blown_SC is offline Retired Vet
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Martha
    I think that a classic must be over 20 years old. So all of you young guys may need to start calling them old school not classics. Sort of like the last time Juggy was laid. Thats a classic.
    Mart, 1984 came out 21 years ago..it's a classic!

  31. #31
    Blown_SC is offline Retired Vet
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,917
    Quote Originally Posted by medic23
    I agree but it should be spared more for quality, not age. Bands like the Who and Rush dont deserve the calssic title while Springsteen and G N' R do
    Were you dropped on your head? The Who and Rush not classic? Pfft..

    How can you not like the amazing instrumentalists of Rush, Geddy's voice is debatbale...but the guitar and drums are phenomenal...

    JP bro.. you're entitled to your opinion...
    Last edited by Blown_SC; 07-20-2004 at 10:42 AM.

  32. #32
    Lozgod's Avatar
    Lozgod is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Philly - Better than you
    Posts
    6,834
    Yall got me on WinMX downloading shuff now.

  33. #33
    BUYLONGTERM's Avatar
    BUYLONGTERM is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    8,067
    Quote Originally Posted by 1victor
    GNR is less a classic than the WHO or Springstein IMO. GNR rocks but not at the calssic stage yet. Crap they disintegrated after their first world tour.
    Exactly!!! to say GNR who are OK are a classic band is ridiculous. The WHO has been around for generations!!!! The who is in the same league as Zeppelin. GNR isn't even in the same league!!!

  34. #34
    mass junkie's Avatar
    mass junkie is offline banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    on the net
    Posts
    8,849
    Wow blt that brings back memories man....I saw van halen back in the 80's with david lee roth...and to me he was who made the band back then...dont get me wrong I like Sammy as well.......anyone is better than that dude from extreme....glad you had fun bro

  35. #35
    decadbal's Avatar
    decadbal is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North Charlotte
    Posts
    11,924
    dam, how many of u guys saw jesus get it? old fockers....lol halen rocks though

  36. #36
    Pale Horse's Avatar
    Pale Horse is offline F.I.L.F.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ACLU headquarters
    Posts
    6,425
    Loz that was an excellent album but one album does not make a band a classic IMO.

  37. #37
    OGPackin's Avatar
    OGPackin is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    6,022
    Quote Originally Posted by buylongterm
    Exactly!!! to say GNR who are OK are a classic band is ridiculous. The WHO has been around for generations!!!! The who is in the same league as Zeppelin. GNR isn't even in the same league!!!

    I agree bro! GNR is NOT classic rock. The WHO, Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, and The Rolling Stones are to name a few.....

    OG

  38. #38
    Mart651's Avatar
    Mart651 is offline The Redneck Queen of the Lounge
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    chatt
    Posts
    3,142
    Quote Originally Posted by OGPackin
    I agree bro! GNR is NOT classic rock. The WHO, Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, and The Rolling Stones are to name a few.....

    OG

    What about Queen? Now thats classic.

  39. #39
    mass junkie's Avatar
    mass junkie is offline banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    on the net
    Posts
    8,849
    they started playing gnr on the classic rock stations in miami.....Big 106....I dont mind having them thrown in the rotation with the likes of zepplin, golden earring, sabbath, and all those bad boys

  40. #40
    OGPackin's Avatar
    OGPackin is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    6,022
    Quote Originally Posted by Mart651
    What about Queen? Now thats classic.

    Yes they are Martha...ummm, i mean Mart...

    OG

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •