09-29-2004, 10:35 AM #1
Didn't bulk during prime ages 16 - 20. L-T impact?
I started training at 18, but I didn't bulk to take advantage of my natural test. I was aiming for only moderate size and definition. I'm 29 now, and I realize that a better strategy may have been to bulk during these years and then cut later. My question is whether this matters now, if diet / training / cardio etc. is all in order. Tks
09-29-2004, 10:49 AM #2
if it mattered now, youd have control over it..LOL
09-29-2004, 10:51 AM #3
I dont get the question.
09-29-2004, 10:54 AM #4
listen to this pure brillance "allright man tell me are you asking if you cant bulk anymore since you dont have the natural test of your teenage years. Are you asking
can you still bulk if thats the question then yes you can just run test.
09-29-2004, 11:25 AM #5
I've only recently started to apply the knowledge I have gained from this board, and I am seeing great results. I'm natural and not considering AS. I'm just wondering if I had employed these training & diet strategies earlier, with a focus on bulking during the ages 16-20 and cutting later, whether my current physique would be much better.
Last edited by LaRoche; 09-29-2004 at 11:48 AM.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)