From what I hear clomid is the reason Peter North shoots like a waterfall. Has anyone else heard this and at what doseage?
Printable View
From what I hear clomid is the reason Peter North shoots like a waterfall. Has anyone else heard this and at what doseage?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mandyandbobby
Ummmm...not something i want to think about.... :bath:
OG
Hey og, come on man you WISH you could shoot like Pete! Girls LOVE it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by mandyandbobby
LOL...Actually not to brag but i actually do...;)
http://67.18.108.244/showthread.php?...orn+star+loads
OG
Thats cool! I shoot good loads but, I shoot multiple loads back to back when I am either on e or some top notch weed. When added up it equals to a "porn star" load!
OG says mine tastes like strawberries.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maraxus
hahahaha! U fuker i just spit water all over my monitor..... :lol:
OG
but I thought you swallowed :unsure: ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by OGPackin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maraxus
hahaha! Stop bro ur killin me..... :lol: I set myself up for that one huh...fuker
OG
Quote:
Originally Posted by OGPackin
oh ya ;)
i believe it, cause when im on clomid it seems like it never stops lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by mandyandbobby
here you go
epartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de Cruces, Pais Vasco University, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.
OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of performing two inseminations per cycle in IUI with husband's sperm compared with one insemination per cycle. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. SETTING: Randomized and prospective trials comparing two inseminations vs. one insemination per cycle in IUI with husband's sperm, retrieved by MEDLINE and Cochrane Library searches (1966-2001) and a manual search of the abstracts of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine annual meetings (1990-2001). PATIENT(S): A total of 865 patients underwent 1156 cycles of IUI with husband's sperm. INTERVENTION(S): After different ovarian stimulation protocols, one or two inseminations were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy rate per cycle. Detected studies were tested for homogeneity. Because heterogeneity was observed, DerSimonian-Laird relative risk with alleatory effects was used. RESULT(S): Six randomized and prospective trials involving 865 patients and 1156 cycles were identified. There was remarkable heterogeneity among the different studies concerning methodology, especially regarding ovarian cycle management and the timing of inseminations. Although the pregnancy rate per cycle was somewhat higher in the two-inseminations-per-cycle group (14.9% vs. 11.4%), there were no statistically significant differences (relative risk = 1.34; 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.99). CONCLUSION(S): No significant differences were observed when two inseminations per cycle were performed, compared with one insemination. There was great heterogeneity concerning ovarian management and insemination timing. This heterogeneity hampered the analysis. We detected a better pregnancy rate with two inseminations vs. one insemination when clomiphene citrate with or without gonadotropins and 5000 IU of hCG were used. More studies are necessary to ascertain whether this is true or merely an artifact from the multiple subgroups analysis.
Publication Types:
Comment
Meta-Analysis
Review
Review, Tut