Thread: Read This You Inbred Libs!
11-01-2004, 05:57 PM #1
Read This You Inbred Libs!
FACTS VS LIBERAL NEW FICTION:
There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq during the month of January.....
in the fair city of Detroit (Michigan) there were 35 murders in the month of
January. That's one American city folks, about as deadly as the entire war torn
country of Iraq!
Worst president in history?
The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the editor.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain
about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst
president in U.S. history. Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on
terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did.
From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked
us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.
I think history might show Eisenhower committed the troops and Kennedy was
honoring that commitment.
Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost,
an average of 5,800 per year.
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never
attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by
Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the three years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two
countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in
Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who
slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We lost about 1,100 soldiers, an average of 550 a
year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at
Worst president in history? Come on!
The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking, but...
It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the Branch
Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation.
We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than
it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.
It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the
Medina Republican Guard than it took Teddy Kennedy to call the police after his
Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.
It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida!!!!
Our military is GREAT! PASS IT ON.
11-01-2004, 06:00 PM #2
love it man, GO BUSH
11-01-2004, 06:02 PM #3Originally Posted by BigGenes
11-01-2004, 06:02 PM #4
11-01-2004, 06:04 PM #5
kerry is crap..
11-01-2004, 06:04 PM #6Originally Posted by Matrix78
11-01-2004, 06:05 PM #7Originally Posted by BigGenes
and just so everyone knows, the terrorists will attack us again, whether bush or kerry is in office. if you honestly think bush is stopping the terrorists from attacking us at this time, your a complete moron and dont have a brain. it was how many years between the 2 trade center attacks? ok well in that many years i promise you we'll be attacked again no matter who is in office. its only a matter of time, just like it was then. and bush is not making anyone like us anymore around the world, he is only adding gas to the fire with his white trash kill em all attitude.
THAT PUSSY DODGED A DRAFT AND YOU GUYS THINK HE'S A GOOD COMMANDER? YEAH THAT MUST BE THE QUALITIES OF A GOOD GUY ? IDIOTS!!!!
Last edited by jcstomper; 11-01-2004 at 06:08 PM.
11-01-2004, 06:05 PM #8
how many of those murders in d-city were drug related??? how many were innocent and didnt deserve it????
11-01-2004, 06:06 PM #9Originally Posted by BigGenes had said
11-01-2004, 06:19 PM #10
Well, before you go calling liberals inbreds I supposr there are a few facts you should know. The first is that just because it's written by a republican doesnt make it fact. Here are some things that you learn in real history books. That is to say books that are more advanced than junior high, high schoo, and undergrad.
1)The first americans in vietnam were killed in 1959, thats 3 years BEFORE this incorrect article claims. Who was president in 59? Wasn't it Dwight D. Eisenhower? Wait, wasnt he a...republican? I think he was.
2)Detroit is as deadly as Iraq? Any one of you who truely believes that are just lacking intelligence. And judging by some of the replies I don't think you need answer that. Iraqi civilian deaths are over 100,000. Thats much worse than 9/11. And on a country THAT DIDNT ATTACK us. I thought i'd put that in caps since the article seems to like that phrase.
3)WWII? Japan was Germany's ally. When we declared war on japan, they declared war on us. Anybody remember the telegram from Hitler to mexico trying to persuade them to attack us? No? Didnt think so, none of you seem to know anything about history. Bush talks about alliances being important, let me ask you, is it only other countries who should come to our aid? Because britain was being firebombed daily. We went to help them as well, not to mention Hitler was trying to get other countries to attack us.
4)Iraq is not taken. If it were US soldiers would not be dying on a daily basis.
Look, I never said W was the worst president, but he is sure as hell no shinning star. After all the democratic publications you have all called propaganda it is depressing to see that none of you see this for what it is....A PLAIN DISTORTION OF THE TRUTH AND MERE PROPAGANDA.
you all need to use your heads. What's it like being told what to think?
11-01-2004, 06:20 PM #11VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
LOL when was the last time an American was beheaded an american city? How about any car bombs? How about 50 local soldiers being killed by forgeiners? The post paints a very unrealistic picture of what going on in Iraq. Look at what's going on the U.S did not take Iraq......it's still a hell hole for your troops. More boots were needed on the ground from day 1. Now terrorist S.O.Bs are running the place........if your are going to war plan it properly, they let insurgents get a foothold by playing pussy. I was thinking the otherday when the news was saying "oh when we catch saddam the situation will improve!!" yet things have gotten worse.....i hope your troop get out soon.
11-01-2004, 06:41 PM #12Associate Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
Im with you and I will be voting Bush and Cheney tomorrow. Great article
11-01-2004, 06:43 PM #13Originally Posted by skiing
if you did youd see that your great article is all lies. it scares me that they actually let a person like you vote
11-01-2004, 06:44 PM #14
good post, bush o4!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
11-01-2004, 06:48 PM #15
I have a question. All of you who reply with things like great post, and Im with you etc etc. Do you have selective reading capabilities? You only read what sounds good to you? For example: you completely skip the TRUTH?
11-01-2004, 06:49 PM #16Originally Posted by symatech
11-01-2004, 06:54 PM #17Originally Posted by BigGenes
Not saying I agree or disagree with you so dont start any **** w/ me, but Saudi Arabia didn't attack us either. Just a thought
11-01-2004, 06:56 PM #18Originally Posted by jcstomper
NUCLEAR< NOT NUCULAR YOU FVCKTARD
11-01-2004, 07:15 PM #19VET Retired
Originally Posted by HULK1732
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
11-01-2004, 07:21 PM #20Originally Posted by angelxterminator
11-01-2004, 07:22 PM #21Originally Posted by symatech
11-01-2004, 07:27 PM #22
Also, there was a reason why Hitler declared for the U.S.. It had nothing to do with Hitler wanting to fight us. Hitler wanted Japan to open a second front on Russia, by attacking them from the East. He thought that by declaring war on the U.S.., that Japan in turn would declare war on the Soviet Union; which of course did not happen. The Soviets and Japanese where not at War with one another until 1945.
11-01-2004, 07:34 PM #23
I'm just disappointed he didn't get a blowjob...
Originally Posted by jcstomperThe answer to your every question
A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted
to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially
one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.
If you get scammed by an UGL listed on this board or by another member here, it's all part of the game and learning experience for you,
we do not approve nor support any sources that may be listed on this site.
I will not do source checks for you, the peer review from other members should be enough to help you make a decision on your quest. Buyer beware.
Why the Police will Kick your ass
11-01-2004, 07:41 PM #24
Perfect example of how some people will believe whatever propaganda is shoved up their as,ses and then spread it as gospel to other narrow minded and ignorant fools.
11-01-2004, 07:50 PM #25
just to point out a problem with this post: you are from louisiana, which is a geneticists wet dream. if you look in any book on genetics most of the human studies come out of the south, simply because there is so much inbreeding. if anyone on this board is inbred, you are a prime candidate.
Last edited by sin; 11-01-2004 at 07:53 PM.
11-01-2004, 08:12 PM #26
I like to call liberals what Arnold calls them " girly men" LOL!!!!
11-01-2004, 08:17 PM #27VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
LOL anyone Arnold promoting Bush? " if u flex your mazelles this election" "Bush will be back" lol corny ****.
11-01-2004, 09:26 PM #28Originally Posted by JohnDoe1234
Regardless, however, the point still stands. Hitler never wanted to fight the US, that is true, in fact Ribbentrop supplied large sums of money to the German ambassador in Washington to try and sway congressman not to declare war, or rather to maintain an isolationistic attituce. Japan attacked us because they wanted free reign in the pacific, and the US Navy greatly impeded that.
But seriously, is there anybody in this country who thinks that our entry into WWII was a bad choice? The author of this article is pretty much declaring such, but only because a democratic president took us there. Which is definately a blow to the common republican theory that democrats are scarred or want to avoid war at all cost. Like I said, England was being bombed constantly, we went to their aid. As well as to the aid of the bloodless and bloody conquests of austria, czechoslovakia, poland, holland, belgium, norway, denmark, and france.
Hitler wanted us out of the war for another reason, he wanted to have to fight only one front at a time. Hence, when he conquered france he wanted to focus soley on Russia.
This author is a disgrace. He projects human life lost in WWII as if it were a waste. I say that WWII was a far more noble cause than Iraq anyday. And seriously, does anybody disagree? If so we can debate it till the cows come home in another thread.
It took a lot to get the Russians to declare war, and hurled us into the cold war which shortly followed. But thats for another thread.
On another note, JohnDoe1234 thank you for contributing something thoughtfull instead of the thoughtless comments from most others in this thread. And thank you for correcting my embarrasing mistake
I wont forget it again
11-01-2004, 09:45 PM #29
Symatech that article is propaganda the same as statements " we went it alone" " war for oil" ect.... We are allowed to have our propaganda too!!! LOL
You must be able to see that the democratic party has done a complete 180* in the past 50 years. They are nothing like the party of the 50's and 60's.
11-01-2004, 09:56 PM #30
Bush dodged his obligation to this country when he was in the texas air national guard he pussied out, and he has the nerve to call himself a war president. He aint nuthin but a puppet for Cheney and his father. Bush's only interest is what is best for the saudi's,, He is the worst president in HISTORY!
11-01-2004, 10:02 PM #31Originally Posted by Anhydro78
11-01-2004, 10:06 PM #32
11-01-2004, 10:14 PM #33Originally Posted by DADDYDBOL
Love this video, really shows kerry for who he is, at least Bush stands by what he says.
And why is this thread in the lounge, theres a million just like it in politics/relgion/war forum
11-01-2004, 10:14 PM #34Originally Posted by jcstomper
11-01-2004, 10:23 PM #35
One thing you have to think of this prolly wasnt written by the GOP. This is just some guy writing a crafty story. I ussually take pride in my party for not going to far with deceptive propaganda intended to prey on ignorant non-informed people. But not every one follows along with that.
I for one am not against calling bullsh!t within my own party.
11-01-2004, 10:26 PM #36
I think if everyone held there own party accountable to only put out truthfull messages our political process would be alot better.
11-01-2004, 11:46 PM #37Originally Posted by Anhydro78
Nice posts btw
11-02-2004, 12:01 AM #38Anabolic Member
Originally Posted by jcstomper
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
One thing that is without any arguement anywhere is going to war with Afganistan. They definately were the enemy nation. Remember back to the beginning of the war, NO ONE in congress wanted to speak up against it, heck, ALL of CONGRESS including all the democrats all had that post Pearl Harbor thinking and voted whole heartedly for the war, including Kerry. Even locally, everyone, black, white, indian, mexicans all together felt unified to back the war, remember the way it really was when we were going into Iraq. We all wanted it and felt it was the right thing to do and I think we will still feel its the right thing to do at the polls tomorrow.
Where I work, there just so happened to be a band of Kerry supporters, including myself but when we heard about the Osama tape that just came out and the man was telling US to vote for Kerry.... well funk you Osama, me and the other 5 at work changed minds and are voting BUSH tommorrow.
11-02-2004, 12:06 AM #39Originally Posted by Ntpadude
11-02-2004, 12:12 AM #40Originally Posted by Decadbal
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)