BOUNCER, you'd love this....COP VIDEO!

Printable View

05-29-2005, 03:18 PM
Dave321

BOUNCER, you'd love this....COP VIDEO!

Crazy cop video... reeeeeeeeeeal ass beating.. :nutkick:
http://www.mycrazyvideos.com/media/g...s_cops_16.html
05-29-2005, 03:33 PM
GORILA-UNIT

Now thats my kinda of video
05-29-2005, 04:59 PM
testo200

holy crap that was awesome. Anyone got a video of a bodybuilder freaking out like that.
05-29-2005, 05:06 PM
1morerep

i don't think they were cops, ive seen this video before i think they are university security guards, they didn't have any firearms and along with the mase they would also have tazed the guy.
05-29-2005, 06:59 PM
fast_eddie

in a lockup like that there not allowed there sidearms
05-29-2005, 07:30 PM
BOUNCER

Those cops were as usefull as tits on a bull. The bigger guy with the short was a coward. If I was his buddy I'd knock the shit out of him for backing off like that. The guy done nothing a kick in the balls wouldn't have sorted.
05-29-2005, 07:42 PM
SwoleDave

I know in our jail, only Lt. and above carry tazers, and as far as sidearms, deadly force would not have been justified there...
05-30-2005, 03:28 AM
BOUNCER

Quote:

Originally Posted by SwoleDave

deadly force would not have been justified there...

Such a pity. As a soldier here in ireland we have five times when we're allowed to use deadly force (the army is a back up to the civil powers here)

1. In defence of your own life.

2. In defence of your comrades life.

3. To prevent yourself from being forcefully disarmed.

4. To prevent serious damage to government property.

5. To protect your post.

I'd have shot that guy under rules 1,2,3 and 5.

An individual does not have to be armed here, just a threat is enough. I believe anyone who goes up against the law of the land has compromised their right to life.
05-30-2005, 07:39 AM
firenwire

Quote:

Originally Posted by BOUNCER

Such a pity. As a soldier here in ireland we have five times when we're allowed to use deadly force (the army is a back up to the civil powers here)

1. In defence of your own life.

2. In defence of your comrades life.

3. To prevent yourself from being forcefully disarmed.

4. To prevent serious damage to government property.

5. To protect your post.

I'd have shot that guy under rules 1,2,3 and 5.

An individual does not have to be armed here, just a threat is enough. I believe anyone who goes up against the law of the land has compromised their right to life.

What was rule number 5? :aaGreen22