Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Dave321 is offline AR's Salad Tossing Connoisseur
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,589

    BOUNCER, you'd love this....COP VIDEO!

    Crazy cop video... reeeeeeeeeeal ass beating..
    http://www.mycrazyvideos.com/media/g...s_cops_16.html

  2. #2
    GORILA-UNIT is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    608
    Now thats my kinda of video

  3. #3
    testo200 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    78
    holy crap that was awesome. Anyone got a video of a bodybuilder freaking out like that.

  4. #4
    1morerep's Avatar
    1morerep is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    334
    i don't think they were cops, ive seen this video before i think they are university security guards, they didn't have any firearms and along with the mase they would also have tazed the guy.

  5. #5
    fast_eddie's Avatar
    fast_eddie is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    caaanada
    Posts
    225
    in a lockup like that there not allowed there sidearms

  6. #6
    BOUNCER is offline Retired Vet
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    IRELAND.
    Posts
    4,185
    Those cops were as usefull as tits on a bull. The bigger guy with the short was a coward. If I was his buddy I'd knock the shit out of him for backing off like that. The guy done nothing a kick in the balls wouldn't have sorted.

  7. #7
    SwoleDave's Avatar
    SwoleDave is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    389
    I know in our jail, only Lt. and above carry tazers, and as far as sidearms, deadly force would not have been justified there...

  8. #8
    BOUNCER is offline Retired Vet
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    IRELAND.
    Posts
    4,185
    Quote Originally Posted by SwoleDave
    deadly force would not have been justified there...

    Such a pity. As a soldier here in ireland we have five times when we're allowed to use deadly force (the army is a back up to the civil powers here)

    1. In defence of your own life.

    2. In defence of your comrades life.

    3. To prevent yourself from being forcefully disarmed.

    4. To prevent serious damage to government property.

    5. To protect your post.

    I'd have shot that guy under rules 1,2,3 and 5.

    An individual does not have to be armed here, just a threat is enough. I believe anyone who goes up against the law of the land has compromised their right to life.

  9. #9
    firenwire's Avatar
    firenwire is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    132
    Quote Originally Posted by BOUNCER
    Such a pity. As a soldier here in ireland we have five times when we're allowed to use deadly force (the army is a back up to the civil powers here)

    1. In defence of your own life.

    2. In defence of your comrades life.

    3. To prevent yourself from being forcefully disarmed.

    4. To prevent serious damage to government property.

    5. To protect your post.

    I'd have shot that guy under rules 1,2,3 and 5.

    An individual does not have to be armed here, just a threat is enough. I believe anyone who goes up against the law of the land has compromised their right to life.
    What was rule number 5?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •