Thread: Arnold Vs Ronnie
-
07-09-2005, 12:07 AM #1
Arnold Vs Ronnie
Just thought i'd post this here this is very interesting and I vote for arnold. I want to see what you all think so I scanned it for ya
-
07-09-2005, 12:09 AM #2
should b in the lounge but....ronnie is bigger and would easily beat arnie now. but imo arnie has a better build and looks better.
-
07-09-2005, 12:10 AM #3
arnie hands down, the build looks a hellava alot better IMO.
-
07-09-2005, 12:11 AM #4
sorry bout that lol is that this is the place I only go to but it can be moved over there
-
07-09-2005, 12:11 AM #5
arnie is GOD!!
-
07-09-2005, 12:34 AM #6
Its sad though because arnie would have a hard time qualifying for nationals these days... its it a shame what bodybuilding is turning into
-
07-09-2005, 12:37 AM #7
Arnold looks ten times beter then coleman its a joke..coleman looks like crap compared to arnold....
-
07-09-2005, 12:45 AM #8
coleman is sooo massive that is crazy..i like arnies look better ill agree
-
07-09-2005, 12:51 AM #9
Ronnie wins at bodybuilding, Arnold is a superior actor.
-
07-09-2005, 12:53 AM #10
agreed but I'm sure arnie would compete well nowadays with all the better technology
-
07-09-2005, 12:54 AM #11
"Technology". Yes there is better "weight-lifting equipment" and "protein supplements" nowadays.
-
07-09-2005, 01:04 AM #12
fine. whatever. maybe ronnie roids more i dont know.
-
07-09-2005, 01:07 AM #13
id take arnies body over ronnies anyday
-
07-09-2005, 01:09 AM #14
I 2nd that because with ronnies body is impossible to get a girl. and we all know arnold did not have a problem with that lol
-
07-09-2005, 01:12 AM #15Originally Posted by playboii
And thats what it all comes down to.
-
07-09-2005, 01:13 AM #16
I also found this and very interesting
Name: Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger
Nicknames: The Oak, The Austrian Oak, The Olympian, Oak, The King, Champ, Arnie,
Schwazzie, Arnold Strong
Location: Los Angeles, Calafornia USA
Born: July 30, 1947 Graz, Austria.
Height: 6'2"
Arms: 22"
Chest: 57"
Waist: 34"
Thighs: 28.5"
Calves: 20"
Off Season Weight: Around 235 lbs.
Competition Weight: Around 260 lbs.***This part is that shocked me
Favorite Exercise: Bent-Over Rows
he went up to 260 at competition and dropped down off season the total opposite of what they do now
-
07-09-2005, 01:41 AM #17Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 924
Arnold competed at 225-240 pounds. He was 240 in the 75 olympia and 225 when he won his last.
-
07-09-2005, 02:24 AM #18
Arnold looks better
Ronnie is a beast
-
07-09-2005, 02:26 AM #19
I don't see ronnie living past the age of 50...the guy is a walking pharmacy, so i'd take Arnie
-
07-09-2005, 02:29 AM #20
thats alot of crap for people to say ronnie is better, first of all arnold didnt do near the drugs that ronnie is doing. and his body still looks better. hes got the flat stomach. ronnie is just too massive, bodybuilding now adays sucks its all about how big you can get.
-
07-09-2005, 02:58 AM #21
i go with arnold. loox alot more healthier..i can't get over ronnie's gut!!
-
07-09-2005, 03:00 AM #22Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 685
I like this post..& I'm happy/suprised that people like Arnold better.
I read something recently that said that about half of Arnolds bodyweight (at one point) was just from D-bol..now who knows if thats true.
I definitely would rather LOOK like arnold..
You wonder though..
What would they both look like if they had not taken any roids?
What would Arnold look like if he was born when Ronnie was & vice versa?
What would each of them look like if they were born with their bodys switched? (haha)
Genetics plays such a big part in who we are already, I think Ronnie would naturally be so much bigger than arnold if they were both natural...i guess thats irrelevant though
-
07-09-2005, 03:40 AM #23Originally Posted by SeanStew
I would rather look like Ronnie to tell you the truth. If I looked like him I would be Mr. Olympia. If I looked like Arnold I wouldn't even be able to get a pro card. The people who say they would rather look like Arnold to get the women must have no experience with women. You could be fat and still get women if you knew how...
-
07-09-2005, 03:40 AM #24Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 924
Ronnie was a beast before he ever took anything look at pictures when he first turned pro. He turned pro in a natural contest. He was about 220 pounds ripped. And i firmly believe that he was all natural at that stage otherwise there is no explanation for the gains he has made since.
-
07-09-2005, 03:45 AM #25
GH could be an explanation
-
07-09-2005, 03:46 AM #26Originally Posted by j martini
there was no way he was all natural, are you kidding, no-ones genetics are that good. and there is explanation, 2-3 times as much juice and HGH! year round cycles!
and i think arnold and ronnies genetics are the same, arnie as a kid he was big, look at pics of him at 18, even if he was juice'n he was huge.
-
07-09-2005, 04:05 AM #27
I think arnold started juicing at around 19...if you look at the pics from him at 18 to 19 he made an incredible gain.
-
07-09-2005, 05:50 AM #28New Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Perth, Australia
- Posts
- 27
as far as todays pro buidling goes ronnie is miles ahead, but arnie was the king of his time and id rather look like him myself
-
07-09-2005, 05:59 AM #29Originally Posted by robkesl
Arnold was juicing in Germany when he FIRST STARTED BODYBUILDING. I remember reading that someone in his gym introduced him to steroids at a young age, like 16yo.
-
07-09-2005, 06:12 AM #30
Arnies upper body with Ronnies legs sounds good to me. Also I would like to see how Arnie would have turned out if he had access to Insulin , hGH and IGF and stayed on year around
-
07-09-2005, 06:14 AM #31Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- My house
- Posts
- 227
This is a really cool listing. I have argued this a lot and all have agredd on arnold. I dont even care who is a pro now, they look so stupid. Why would they do that to their bodies. Arnold looks abosutley hands down the best. That would the ultimate phsyique to achieve. Think about it, who would put ronnie in a move. He would make a ton more money doing that. Also arnold made millions in real estate, married into the kennedys, and became a govenor. Also he has his own competition. Do think that a guy looking like Ronnie could do that if he had the ambition too.
-
07-09-2005, 08:57 AM #32Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 924
Originally Posted by robkesl
Ronnie turned pro about 220 all of a sudden he was about 245, this IMO is when he first started using. Then he became the beast he is today so IMO this was when he threw everything at his body. Colemans growth spurts happened all of a sudden this is what makes me believe the above to be true. If he had just increased the dose over time gains would have being much slower.
The guys genetics are one in a billion and you must also remember that he had about 15 years of training behind him before turning pro.
-
07-09-2005, 09:07 AM #33Originally Posted by j martini
-
07-09-2005, 09:09 AM #34
Yes ronnie is huge, but arnold looks 10times better IMO. I think bodybuilding is a joke these days
-
07-09-2005, 09:14 AM #35
no doubt ronnie is way bigger... but i'd rather look like arnie... coleman looks like the thing from fantastic 4....
-
07-09-2005, 09:19 AM #36
I'm going with Arnold!!!!
-
07-09-2005, 09:21 AM #37Originally Posted by juicehoe
-
07-09-2005, 09:29 AM #38Originally Posted by topvega
-
07-09-2005, 09:35 AM #39Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 896
id say arnold looks much better but i would like to see ronnie's stats. anyone got them?
-
07-09-2005, 09:37 AM #40Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 1,134
2 words.... arnie rules
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
04-23-2024, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS