Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    ward065's Avatar
    ward065 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    964

    Many sites that provide training advice lack a critical component

    Lately i've been growing dissapointed with Weider magazines especially. Inside flex and M&F, you usually see training advice by top/high level pros like mark dugdale, shawn ray, darrem charles, dexter jacksonm etc. They provide their routines- most of these guys work out 4-5 times per week. And they tell you their diets too

    BUT THE LACK a critical component. Obviously, to attain that level of musculature steroids are almost a given! These magazines and articles leave unsuspecting readers false dreams. They won't be able to attain those types of physiques unless they eat a lot, sleep a good amount, train hard- these are all excellent components until you can't get any bigger. But then to get freaky muscular, well we know the juice is loose.

    Take this article on bodybuilding.com for shoulder training as another example (http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/drobson94.htm). Many pros here explain what they do for shoulders- giving newbies to bodybuilding especially somewhat false dreams, if they only train that hard, and eat right, they will look like that. This is not true, most of these guys spend $5000+ on gear and hgh per year. But they don't tell you that, therefore leaving novice readers in the dust.

    read the question and answer section on some of the links on the second page (like with Wong Hong)....they ask, oh, what supplements do you use, and what creatine is the best.......but this is not what these guys are taking to look like that. Again, lies get spread!
    I think this is very dissapointing- if steroids were not illegal, there could be a lot more knowledge shared on their high level of effectiveness.
    Last edited by ward065; 09-23-2005 at 09:28 PM.

  2. #2
    J.S.N.'s Avatar
    J.S.N. is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    all up in yo' buttho'
    Posts
    2,720
    i hate to break it to ya bro but those routines are ghost written by the editors.

  3. #3
    ward065's Avatar
    ward065 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    964
    Quote Originally Posted by J.S.N.
    i hate to break it to ya bro but those routines are ghost written by the editors.
    confused what you are saying

    also, many of these guys say- a fact- for example that they eat a 5000 calorie diet. But i read a recent segment in MD magazine by Charles Glass and he said that very high amounts of protein will NOT BE ABSORBED and will be converted to ammonia- UNLESS performance enhancing drugs are used, which speed up protein synthesis!

    So if these guys were eating 5k calories......and even training as hard as possible.....most of those calories, if they were not using 'em, would go to fat. I think it's facts like this that confirm basically all pros use 'em. And most lie about it

  4. #4
    J.S.N.'s Avatar
    J.S.N. is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    all up in yo' buttho'
    Posts
    2,720
    yeah we all know they use massive doses of gear. the columns and routines are ghost-written too. their routines are garbage, anyone could make one.

    _________'s chest workout:

    incline dumbell press

    3-4 sets, 10-12 reps

    flat DB flyes

    3-4 sets, 10-12 reps

    weighted dips

    3-4 sets, 10-12 reps

    pullovers

    3-4 sets, 10-12 reps

    then they have this thing where the "pro" says

    i like to start with incline dumbell flyes cuz they're hella tight and upper chest is often lacking and dumbells - more symmetrical mass yada yada yada... alot of guys don't do pullovers anymore but that's their loss poopoopoopoop...

    look i'm a FLEX columnist!

  5. #5
    steve0's Avatar
    steve0 is offline NASM~AFPA~CPT
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    3,954
    ghost writing mean the Bodybuilder was interveiwed and a writer for the wed site or magazine wrote it...(i think ) but yes i agree with you more knowlege should be spread about this issue but with all the contrverse in sports these days i think evryone is well aware of steroids , just not educated on doseg's and how to use, the matter of fact i saw an anti steroid commericial on ESPN the other day

  6. #6
    ward065's Avatar
    ward065 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    964
    Quote Originally Posted by steve0
    ghost writing mean the Bodybuilder was interveiwed and a writer for the wed site or magazine wrote it...(i think ) but yes i agree with you more knowlege should be spread about this issue but with all the contrverse in sports these days i think evryone is well aware of steroids, just not educated on doseg's and how to use, the matter of fact i saw an anti steroid commericial on ESPN the other day
    ya...heard arnold was doing that or something for flex & m&f, articles that said he wrote he did not.....recently he gave up his "Executive editor" position and compensation from Weider i believe.

  7. #7
    Tazwell's Avatar
    Tazwell is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    1,085
    another thing is those magazines are marketed to sell as many as possible.. meaning they have to put stuff in there that people will pay money to read.. They also have many advertisers that sponsor the same body builders that they feature in the articles.. those advertisers would be pissed if any steroid talk was printed about athletes they sponsor.

  8. #8
    steve0's Avatar
    steve0 is offline NASM~AFPA~CPT
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by Tazwell
    another thing is those magazines are marketed to sell as many as possible.. meaning they have to put stuff in there that people will pay money to read.. They also have many advertisers that sponsor the same body builders that they feature in the articles.. those advertisers would be pissed if any steroid talk was printed about athletes they sponsor.

    this is very true althought Musclar Development mag, does touch on the subjects of roids quit a bit

  9. #9
    J.S.N.'s Avatar
    J.S.N. is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    all up in yo' buttho'
    Posts
    2,720
    Quote Originally Posted by steve0
    this is very true althought Musclar Development mag, does touch on the subjects of roids quit a bit
    yeah, their knowledge is < someone who's been on AR for like 3 days though. plus they still don't really tell the truth. like paul dillett never went up to a gram, gimme a break... who these guys think they're foolin'?

  10. #10
    ward065's Avatar
    ward065 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    964
    Quote Originally Posted by Tazwell
    another thing is those magazines are marketed to sell as many as possible.. meaning they have to put stuff in there that people will pay money to read.. They also have many advertisers that sponsor the same body builders that they feature in the articles.. those advertisers would be pissed if any steroid talk was printed about athletes they sponsor.
    yeah...it seems Weider's magazines are especially anti-steroid on the surface. MD certainly is not.

    I even read in one M&F issue a section about muscle dysmorphia, and says how mwny people with this "disorder" (and then they talked abouit it in a negative tone) use steroids , referring to that as a problem

    lots of hypocrisy.......then the training advice pros give, most of these guys are juiceheads.

  11. #11
    decadbal's Avatar
    decadbal is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North Charlotte
    Posts
    11,491
    if your gettin your workouts from a mag.... you got alot of problems then.. self education is key.. dont depend on anyone to show you the ropes, learn them on your own.

  12. #12
    devil1's Avatar
    devil1 is offline Jacked Jarhead
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    working:(
    Posts
    3,337
    this is the reason ive slowly switched from flex and m&f to MD. there is a little more truth in there articles.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •