Printable View
What do you guys think? I think even though Big Ronnie is a Freaking animal, Jay Cutler truly is "a cut above" Coleman.
I think Coleman looked his best in 2001 at 245lbs. Now, he's so damn dense that he has lost his separation and definition.
Let's hear it bros, what do you think?
I say Cutler.
my first favorite bb'er was ronnie because I have all of his videos. I think cutler shoudlve won this past Mr.0 but thats just my opinion. There are a couple guys that are going to pass cutler and take 2nd place this next year.
How about Vic Martinez coming outta nowhere and placing 5th this year. My old trainer is Vic's cousin. No shit, Vic has personally made suggestions and reccommendations concerning my training. (kinda cool!) Also, he has been in our gym before.
lost his cuts and seperation, dont take this wrong, but either your blind, or dont know anything about bodybuilding
I like Cutler much better. Ronnie is bigger, but Jay has a better body IMO. Ronnie has a wider back, but Cutlers back just looks better w/ his waistline. Also, Ronnies calves suck to be Mr. Olympia
Quote:
Originally Posted by decadbal
Jay did lose some of his cuts, your right about that. He looked much better for the 03 and 04 Classic than this years Olympia. He is trying to build himself into something his genetics just wont allow. He looked his best around 160-165 diced.
Pro BB and olympia lost all credibility by letting Coleman the glutton suceed .
I no longer believe in that shit.
i hope u mean 260-265...Quote:
Originally Posted by stayinstacked
ha ya thats what i was thinkin..Quote:
Originally Posted by lucabratzi
What I mean by lost his separation is that he has became so dense that when he flexes, you can't see his definition as well anymore. He's 2 tons of shit in a 1 ton truck. Just way too much muscle on his body. To me, he's lost by gaining. Look at him in 2001 when he was 245.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucabratzi
Yeah, thats what I meant, thanks