Printable View
"Deconstruction is not synonymous with "destruction", however. It is in fact much closer to the original meaning of the word 'analysis' itself, which etymologically means "to undo" -- a virtual synonym for "to de-construct." ... If anything is destroyed in a deconstructive reading, it is not the text, but the claim to unequivocal domination of one mode of signifying over another. A deconstructive reading is a reading which analyses the specificity of a text's critical difference from itself."
Ah.....ok. :unsure:
Whew, thought it was just me. Thanks, Pete. :D
It doesn't have a great beat, and you can't dance to it.
Nonetheless, I give you a "D" - while you were able to find the quote, you neglected to cite the reference in proper Turabian, MLA, or Chicago form.
Buzz kill!
interesting...it took me a few reads to finally understand what they were saying lol. im just curious, what brought this up?
Quote:
Originally posted by symatech
interesting...it took me a few reads to finally understand what they were saying lol. im just curious, what brought this up?
I think its a great question. I know that it was a popular subject in the latter part of 2000. So I thought I would post a quick question and see what the best answer would be. Although-it is somewhat rhetorical. :devil:
Believe me if you understand the previous paragraph then you are far ahead of the pack.
Too many big words for me to understand......and I don't own a dictionary.
what the f***...:help: :empty:
Somebody get PBNYC in here to translate!
candy for the brain, man...awesome