Take a shot at this

[JP1570]

I took the LSAT today (Law School Admissions Test). Anyway, that thing is horrible, talk about mess with your head, here's an example of a question:

Statement-
To be horrific, a monster must be threatening. Whether or not it presents psychological, moral, or social dangers, or triggers enduring infantile fears, if a monster is physically dangerous, then it is threatening. In fact, even a physically benign monster is horrific if it inspires revulsion.

Q: Which of the following logically follows from the statements above?


A)Any horror story monster that is threatening is also horrific.

B)A monster that is psychologically dangerous, but that does not inspire
revulsion, is not horrific.

C)If a monster triggers infantile fears, but is not physically dangerous, then it is not horrific.

D)If a monster is both horrific and psychologically threatening, then it does not inspire revulsion.

E)All monsters that are not physically dangerous, but that are psychologically dangerous and inspire revulsion, are threatening.

Anyone taken this test before or plan on taking it???

[Sicilian30]

I'd say A: now what do I win?

[tt333]

I'd say E.

[Terinox]

That question is INSANE! I'll just stick to philosophy and sociology...although...these two can also get kinda scary at times

[David B.]

Originally posted by tt333
I'd say E.

That's my vote as well.

--dnb

[Deadend]

Pretty sick bro, some buddies of mine are finishing their first semester of law school right now. Your in for a long ride man. Good luck

[JP1570]

Originally posted by Sicilian30
I'd say A: now what do I win?

A pat on the back bro, good call.