I took the LSAT today (Law School Admissions Test). Anyway, that thing is horrible, talk about mess with your head, here's an example of a question:
Statement-
To be horrific, a monster must be threatening. Whether or not it presents psychological, moral, or social dangers, or triggers enduring infantile fears, if a monster is physically dangerous, then it is threatening. In fact, even a physically benign monster is horrific if it inspires revulsion.
Q: Which of the following logically follows from the statements above?
A)Any horror story monster that is threatening is also horrific.
B)A monster that is psychologically dangerous, but that does not inspire
revulsion, is not horrific.
C)If a monster triggers infantile fears, but is not physically dangerous, then it is not horrific.
D)If a monster is both horrific and psychologically threatening, then it does not inspire revulsion.
E)All monsters that are not physically dangerous, but that are psychologically dangerous and inspire revulsion, are threatening.
Anyone taken this test before or plan on taking it???
