Strange thing

**fast** · 05-27-2003, 01:42 AM

Im not sure if this should be posted under "Sports talk", moderators can move it there if it doesen`t suit "AR Lounge".

Anyways, my issue was.. Have you spotted that females "respect" and consider all hockey and fotball players (for example) more muscular and powerful than bodybuilders?

Hockey players are considered VERY muscular which is not true.
You can`t even compare a serious amateur bodybuilders physique and hockey players physique. Still people see them muscular, bodybuilders are just freaks who have no strenght, only muscles made by drugs.

This is really irritating, beacuse I know how powerful hockeyplayers are :/

Anyone of you got experiences from this matter?

Sorry for bad english.

**jeffylyte** · 05-27-2003, 08:38 AM

what pisses me off is when people consider soccer players being muscular, oh wait you said football, I thought you meant REAL football

**fast** · 05-27-2003, 08:54 AM

Yeah, well soccer players..

**palme** · 05-27-2003, 09:23 AM

Depends on what you look at, Mikael Renberg (plays in Toronto) has 90cm around each quad (not cut but still big). Same as Jay Cutler has.
Quads are the only muscle that looks impressive on a hockey player imo.

**daem** · 05-27-2003, 10:25 AM

quads are the only muscles that look impressive because of the sheer volume of padding worn! typically, the average football/hockey player is thick instead of cut.

the best shape athletes (outside of bodybuilding) imo would have to be lacrosse players.

**palme** · 05-27-2003, 11:00 AM

Originally posted by daem
quads are the only muscles that look impressive because of the sheer volume of padding worn! typically, the average football/hockey player is thick instead of cut.

the best shape athletes (outside of bodybuilding) imo would have to be lacrosse players.

90cm without the padding! Ive seen him in shorts.