Results 1 to 28 of 28
Thread: Picture Of Kobe's Accuser!
-
07-24-2003, 10:55 AM #1
....
....
Last edited by BigTek; 04-24-2009 at 04:20 AM.
-
07-24-2003, 10:58 AM #2Respected Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Miller's Crossing
- Posts
- 6,270
I think this thread should be deleted. It will only bring about assumptions and speculation about the case. I've seen it before
Her name and face shouldn't even be released at this point in time. That is customary in any sexual assult case.
No offense to you Tek, just my personal opinion on this matter.
-
07-24-2003, 11:14 AM #3Originally Posted by Pheedno
-
07-24-2003, 11:18 AM #4Originally Posted by Pheedno
-
07-24-2003, 11:28 AM #5
She looks different than what was posed earlier.
http://anabolicreview.com/vbulletin/...threadid=59830
-
07-24-2003, 11:31 AM #6VET
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 7,424
That's because what was posted earlier wasn't her. Not even sure if this picture is her until I see it on CNN. A few days ago they even once said that there was already pictures of her out, and they were confirming that those weren't her.
I do know that the Daily Show (Jilian Barbarie) said that there's a picture of her on the Globe with a black bar across the eyes.
-
07-24-2003, 11:37 AM #7Respected Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Miller's Crossing
- Posts
- 6,270
[QUOTE=BigGreen]This is true, though, if I'm not mistaken, this is very much an unwritten and unspoken custom when pertaining to the media.[QUOTE=BigGreen]
I think it's actually a matter of the DA's discretion. In a case such as this, the revealing of the victims name can cause a stock pile of false evidence pertaining to the case, and also pieces of information about the victim that would otherwise have no justifiable effect to the case. This not only victimizes the victim to media scrutiny, but also creates more problems to find out the true story of what happened, which ultimately could prove to be a disadvantage to the accused.
-
07-24-2003, 12:00 PM #8Originally Posted by Pheedno
-
07-24-2003, 12:14 PM #9
This is actually a very good intellectual/political debate!!
-
07-24-2003, 12:18 PM #10
Well if it wasnt kobe this wouldnt be news that sells and there for the DA (or whoever) wouldnt have sold the story. I know your talking about a general discussion but in this case itīs b/c itīs a celebrity thats accused.
The names should be confidential as long as noone is sentenced guilty, then if itīs a sex offender hang that bastard out in the open so everyone knows what kind of sick person he/she is, but only if sentenced guilty.
-
07-24-2003, 12:23 PM #11Respected Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Miller's Crossing
- Posts
- 6,270
Originally Posted by BigGreen
Kind of a sickening and cynical thought but true enough in mosy instances.
I also think with a case involving a personality of this magnitude, their is really no possible way to keep idenity classified(looks like for the victim as well). Too many looking for a buck to turn over a name, a little bit of fame with their face on the news, or just good'ol fashion likening in the demise of others(ultimately reminding these persons that their life just aint that bad)
I personally don't think the name of either should be released in any case in which the name alone of either party could cause a chance of false information. Innocents have been thrown in jail because of that.
Keep things under wraps, and realease the results after the inpartial have spoken-Unfortunately in todays system, the court of public opinion is too strong
As far as this case? the names are out. If he's guilty, I hope that ruth comes to light and he's sent to prison. If he's innocent and the actual victim here, I hope he's exonerated. Unfortunately for Kobe, if thats the case, his rep is still forever tarnished.
I'm neutral on the case. I do think he's a piece of shit for cheating on his wife.
-
07-24-2003, 01:49 PM #12Originally Posted by Money Boss Hustla
anyways, why is kobe's wife all standing by his side? he freaking cheated on her!!! oh yeah, i forgot...he's a multimillionair...=P that shit pisses me off...
-- cb
-
07-24-2003, 02:03 PM #13
This picture was posted on the internet earlier this week. I understand that this is NOT the girl...biut a couple of acquanitances of her....
-
07-24-2003, 02:09 PM #14Originally Posted by clockworks
Wow! What a time to discuss this...I apologize.
-
07-24-2003, 07:11 PM #15Originally Posted by Pheedno
What the hell should we discuss in the AR lounge then. What we eat during the day and how much weight we can bench press.
He never even mentioned the girls name. This board IMO is becoming too communist and trying to prevent people from being offended. Like I said, just because ONE person is offended by a thread DOES NOT make the thread OFFENSIVE and DELETED.
Where is the diversity. As long as we post about Fina and prop the thread is ok?
That is just my opinion. I am seeing a SHIT LOAD of posts saying threads should be deleted let alone the ones I have not seen that probably have been deleted.
WHATEVER
-
07-24-2003, 07:13 PM #16Originally Posted by clockworks
-
07-24-2003, 07:19 PM #17Originally Posted by bermich
-
07-24-2003, 11:27 PM #18
....
Last edited by BigTek; 04-24-2009 at 04:18 AM.
-
07-25-2003, 10:02 AM #19Respected Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Miller's Crossing
- Posts
- 6,270
Originally Posted by bermich
For the record I am not offended by the thread, and did not express my opinion that it should be deleted because of that. I am actually gald that it turned into a respectable and worthy debate(untill your immature and unwarranted sarcastic "humor" that sits above this post)
A thread on this subject has already been locked on this board as well as fitness geared because of speculation, assumption, and innapropriate material.
Furthermore Tek- The don't like it, don't read it stance unfortunately can't always be a feasible solution for innaporpriate material. This very subject had already gotten out of hand once. My opinion merely espressed concern that it could happen again.
In this instance, it didn't; which I think shows that our members might actually get the reasoning behind some of the concerned memebers convictions.Last edited by Pheedno; 07-25-2003 at 10:37 AM.
-
07-25-2003, 10:07 AM #20
To answer my own question...
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/interne....ap/index.html
-
07-25-2003, 10:13 AM #21
....
Last edited by BigTek; 04-24-2009 at 04:17 AM.
-
07-25-2003, 10:34 AM #22Originally Posted by BigTek
-
07-25-2003, 10:44 AM #23
....
Last edited by BigTek; 04-24-2009 at 04:16 AM.
-
07-25-2003, 11:36 AM #24Originally Posted by bermich
Back to the topic at hand...
I concur with BigGreen in that this is no longer a "regular" sexual assault case, since the alleged perpetrator is a *very* high profile celebrity. Hence, all the rules for should "should" happen in a regular sexual assault case are completely thrown out the window.
Oh, and I agree with Pheedno, Kobe is a total asshole for cheating on his wife.Last edited by Strut99GT; 07-25-2003 at 11:39 AM.
-
07-25-2003, 11:41 AM #25
....
Last edited by BigTek; 04-24-2009 at 04:16 AM.
-
07-25-2003, 01:01 PM #26
It's really pointless to speculate in the meantime. This case has actually made me check myself big-time, because when I first heard about it, I thought, "Of course he did it, that asshole! Damn rich basketball players taking advantage of the innocent!" But after thinking about it, I thought "Damn girl trying to take money away from a poor innocent rich guy, and get her 15 minutes!"
The reality is that neither one is even close to accurate probably, and soon enough the truth (hopefully) will come out. But in the meantime, I shouldn't be so quick to judge a book by its cover.
-
07-25-2003, 05:25 PM #27Originally Posted by bermich
-
07-25-2003, 07:55 PM #28Originally Posted by EXCESS
Good reply. Not arguementative and to the point. You are right about rules and all that.
I really wanna find something in there to disagree with but DAMNIT you left me with nothing...
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Heart and hair safe summer cycle?
03-25-2024, 07:30 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS