Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    ptbyjason Guest

    Talking Lawmaker: Is CD copy-protection illegal?

    By John Borland
    Staff Writer, CNET News.com
    January 4, 2002, 1:20 p.m. PT
    Record companies' efforts to protect CDs against digital copying are beginning to draw scrutiny from lawmakers concerned that the plans might violate the law.

    On Friday, Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Va., sent a letter to executives of the recording industry's trade association, asking whether anti-piracy technology on CDs might override consumers' abilities to copy albums they have purchased for personal use.

    A 1992 law allows music listeners to make some personal digital copies of their music. In return, recording companies collect royalties on the blank media used for this purpose. For every digital audio tape (DAT), blank audio CD, or minidisc sold, a few cents go to record labels.

    "I am particularly concerned that some of these technologies may prevent or inhibit consumer home-recording using recorders and media covered by the" Audio Home Recording Act (AHRA), Boucher wrote. "Any deliberate change to a CD by a content owner that makes (the allowed personal copies) no longer possible would appear to violate the content owner's obligations."

    The Capitol Hill attention is a potentially daunting sign for recording companies, which are becoming bolder in their efforts to keep consumers from making unauthorized copies of CDs. Each of the major record labels has said it is looking at several versions of new anti-copying technology; in particular, Universal Music Group executives have said they want to protect a large proportion of their new releases as soon as midyear.

    The labels are worried that the rise of home CD-burners has eaten into album sales, particularly after the worst year in a decade for the music industry.

    Universal was the first major label to openly distribute a copy-protected CD in the United States, with the release of a soundtrack to the "Fast and the Furious" film in December. Companies that produce copy-protection technology say other albums have been quietly released into the market, but verified sightings have been rare.

    The AHRA issue had been spotlighted by a few copyright attorneys for several months, but until now it has not been a large part of the debate over copy protection.

    "If you put technology in place that prevents people from using their recording devices, then it seems that you should not be eligible for the royalty payments" under the AHRA, said Fred von Lohmann, a staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

    A representative for the Recording Industry Association of America had no immediate comment on Boucher's letter, saying the group had not yet seen it.

    Boucher, who has been a legislative opponent of the big recording companies for some time, asked the industry group to respond to a long list of questions describing the technologies the record labels are using. He stopped short of saying what he might do if he decided that the technologies do violate the terms of the 1992 law.

  2. #2
    ptbyjason Guest
    This is great news for me. I do download songs and burn them at times. But that is usually only when I don't want the whole album. I don't want to pay $15 + for a CD that I only like one or two songs on. This may be really good news for me and several of you as well. If they are allowed to protect their CDs, I will no longer be able to do it.

  3. #3
    Scorpion's Avatar
    Scorpion is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    110
    What really burns me about that proposal is that the record companies don't want you to be able to make copies of the cd which you bought nor make mp3s off of it either. I mean what the hell?! We have all made compilation tapes of all our favorite songs on cassette - Why can't we do the same with cds?!

    That's the best part! - To take a couple of songs off a few cds and then burn them onto 1 compilation cd. Why are the record companies so greedy! They actually even had the nerve to propose an idea where they could legally hack into your computer and delete mp3s right off your hard drive! WTF, these guys are freaking music nazis!

  4. #4
    arthurb999's Avatar
    arthurb999 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,715
    Computer geniuses will always be able to figure out a way ... don't worry guys... there is no such thing as "copy proof".

  5. #5
    Full Intensity's Avatar
    Full Intensity is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    3,281
    Listen when they made XP they thought it to be water tight. Now look at copies that i might have wink wink, there is no so called registration and i can update as often as i want. There will always be loop holes, thus is the nature of programming. They will find ways and soon i will too, which is what i am in school for, so don't worry and don't fear, FI is here LMAO! jk. I don't understand why the record companies didn't make such a big deal when they came out with the tape recorder. Shit all there songs were then recorded right off the radio. No one needed to buy the albums, the only differece is that CD's are the new age of tape recorders just like streaming audio is the new age of the radio. So what gives, why make such a fuss now, when they didn't befor?

    just my 2 cents

  6. #6
    MBaraso's Avatar
    MBaraso is offline Retired Mod
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    7,611
    Computer geniuses will always be able to figure out a way ... don't worry guys... there is no such thing as "copy proof".
    Exactly....

    M

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •