Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 66
  1. #1
    decadbal's Avatar
    decadbal is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North Charlotte
    Posts
    11,491

    over rated arnold

    well im gonna start a war now, so here goes. arnold is way over rated, his physique for the time was ok, but still wasnt as great as i read guys make it out to be here. no triceps, no obliques, no legs, his chest and bis. thats it, other than his ego... he has nothing. columbo looked 10x better, so did frank zane as far as symntry goes. so thats my view... let the war begin...lol

  2. #2
    PumpingIron's Avatar
    PumpingIron is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    25
    Robby Robinson looked way better then Arnold and Frank Zane!

  3. #3
    bermich's Avatar
    bermich is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    4,690
    I was thinking the SAME THING. I caught part of Conan the barbian last night and was looking at his body. Sure he was more into acting at that time but he wasnt all that great compared to most. Even his traps were weak compared to most bodybuilders. Yesteryear in bodybuilding can no longer even compete with todays, but even then, he got lucky and had popularity on his side.
    Im glad he won most of the competitions because he helped change the sport and get it more recognized. He also contributes a lot to the sport....

  4. #4
    ttuPrincess Guest
    I think a lot of the craze over Arnold was started because women were crazy over him because of his accent and muscles, since there wernt a lot of really big guys back when he 1st came around. And that being said, a lot of men may think hes so great because he got a lot of women and good looking women at that. Hummmm maybe im just over analyzing things... like a woman.. oh well

  5. #5
    PumpingIron's Avatar
    PumpingIron is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    25
    Arnold's 1980 Mr. O was bull****. Frank Zane should of won!

  6. #6
    ttuPrincess Guest
    Let me correct something from my last post... there were not a lot of really big guys in the media, and films when he 1st came around.... there were big guys in BBing , etc..

  7. #7
    Prime's Avatar
    Prime is offline Naturally perfect
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Tropical England
    Posts
    3,523
    Franco was better built then Arnold but was overshadowed by Arnolds height. Anyone see pumping iron? Franco should have won that olympia! As for MrO 1980 are we forgetting Mentzer??

  8. #8
    HiFi's Avatar
    HiFi is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    331
    haters.. arnold IS bodybuilding.

  9. #9
    jbigdog69's Avatar
    jbigdog69 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Euphoria
    Posts
    2,125

    I agree somewhat.

    Quote Originally Posted by HiFi
    haters.. arnold IS bodybuilding.
    Sergio was the big start and Arnold was the punchline. Without Arnold our Sport would be further behind than it is now. Arnold was the best thing for his era. I only have good things to say about Arnie. Peace

  10. #10
    juicehoe's Avatar
    juicehoe is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    the gym
    Posts
    2,369
    Quote Originally Posted by PumpingIron
    Robby Robinson looked way better then Arnold and Frank Zane!
    I think robby robinson looked great too. But Zane looks like an over sized E.T

    decadbal: No tris? how do you figure that!? 22inch arms... his arms were jaw droping amazing

  11. #11
    Mr. Death's Avatar
    Mr. Death is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    1,441
    Quote Originally Posted by Prime
    Franco was better built then Arnold but was overshadowed by Arnolds height. Anyone see pumping iron? Franco should have won that olympia! As for MrO 1980 are we forgetting Mentzer??
    I agree that Arnold beat Franco because of his height. Listen to Arnold when he is in the audience watching Franco pose. He is amazed by Franco's physique.

  12. #12
    inheritmylife's Avatar
    inheritmylife is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    a state of denial
    Posts
    2,354
    Steve up there is still the ultimate in my book.

  13. #13
    samoth's Avatar
    samoth is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Kadath
    Posts
    678
    I think Lee Priest looks 10x better than Ronnie Coleman, but does that mean that Ronnie is overrated? Well, probably, but still.

    It is the freaks, however they are defined by their generation, that gain the publicity. Franco had much better symmetry, I agree. But for acting, intelligence, drive and perseverence in all aspects of life I think Arnold surpasses any bodybuilder of any generation sans none.

    But Sergio... I never understood why he wasn't more popular? Let me rephrase... I'm sure he was, but he never seemed to be in the spotlight nearly as much as Arnold and company. Why was that?

    I never liked Zane. Don't know why, just never preferred his body style or asthetics. Mentzer had a solid physique, but I never saw anything he had that would top Arnold, Columbo, or Sergio.

  14. #14
    Carlos_E's Avatar
    Carlos_E is offline National Level Bodybuilder/Hall of Famer/RETIRED
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    17,629
    Quote Originally Posted by decadbal
    well im gonna start a war now, so here goes. arnold is way over rated, his physique for the time was ok, but still wasnt as great as i read guys make it out to be here. no triceps, no obliques, no legs, his chest and bis. thats it, other than his ego... he has nothing. columbo looked 10x better, so did frank zane as far as symntry goes. so thats my view... let the war begin...lol
    Decabal, this may be the first and only time we agree. I can't stand the way people idolize Arnold. To me he's nothing special. I like his movies but that's it. As far as a body builder, I've seen better.

  15. #15
    decadbal's Avatar
    decadbal is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North Charlotte
    Posts
    11,491
    as far as his 22 inche arms go, imagine if he had some tris.. he doenst, look at his pics, all bicep, tiny girl triceps...

  16. #16
    inheritmylife's Avatar
    inheritmylife is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    a state of denial
    Posts
    2,354
    Quote Originally Posted by Carlos_E
    Decabal, this may be the first and only time we agree. I can't stand the way people idolize Arnold. To me he's nothing special. I like his movies but that's it. As far as a body builder, I've seen better.
    He was tall and semi-blond. That went a long way in making someone popular back then.

  17. #17
    decadbal's Avatar
    decadbal is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North Charlotte
    Posts
    11,491
    not really, it was all california based, and at the time those ppl were supposedly years ahead of the rest of the US.. i dont see why anyone liked him

  18. #18
    Carlos_E's Avatar
    Carlos_E is offline National Level Bodybuilder/Hall of Famer/RETIRED
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    17,629
    Quote Originally Posted by inheritmylife
    He was tall and semi-blond. That went a long way in making someone popular back then.

  19. #19
    inheritmylife's Avatar
    inheritmylife is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    a state of denial
    Posts
    2,354
    He had a look. A look good enough to get him into the movies as a 20 million dollar a movie actor. that is the basis of his poular appeal. Tall, hansome, and jacked. Pretty good building blocks to make someone an idol of sorts.

    Bodybuilding wise, he was definately not universaly dominant over his competitors. There were many traits that others had him beat in.

  20. #20
    groverman1's Avatar
    groverman1 is offline Cross Dressing Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Motor City
    Posts
    2,545
    Well I do agree in 80' Columbo should have won and Robby should have won more.

  21. #21
    juicehoe's Avatar
    juicehoe is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    the gym
    Posts
    2,369
    Quote Originally Posted by decadbal
    as far as his 22 inche arms go, imagine if he had some tris.. he doenst, look at his pics, all bicep, tiny girl triceps...
    Girl triceps? I guess your women is packing better tris then this:



    And this one because his arms are awesome lol

  22. #22
    PurePower is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Antarctica
    Posts
    1,919
    Quote Originally Posted by juicehoe
    Girl triceps? I guess your women is packing better tris then this:



    And this one because his arms are awesome lol

    Yea no SH!T......This is not even a topic worth debating....Let the pictures speak for them selves.

  23. #23
    decadbal's Avatar
    decadbal is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North Charlotte
    Posts
    11,491
    they have, and his tris are am. where you from in ga bro

  24. #24
    RP7's Avatar
    RP7
    RP7 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Great White North
    Posts
    917
    BOW DOWN before ARNOLD or feel My wrath

  25. #25
    ttuPrincess Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by decadbal
    tiny girl triceps...
    should I be offended?????

  26. #26
    TinCup17's Avatar
    TinCup17 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    164
    I agree that Columbo looked better than Arnold.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,506
    Well, I for one agree that arnold IS overrated.



    Red

  28. #28
    Testsubject's Avatar
    Testsubject is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    shoutingatthedevil
    Posts
    2,812
    The reason Arnold is such a big deal is cuz he was the FIRST big thing to really hit bodyduilding. I still think hes the best BBer ever, i think hes better than the guys now, i think all around the guys back then looked a whole lot better then the guys now, theres too much bull**** today in BBing back then it was just the basics, far better IMO. And i honestly think he looked better than all the guys back then too.

  29. #29
    LM1332 Guest
    Today top BBs are freaks full of juice. Now all they care about is how big they can get and how many CCs they can shoot before they die. Back then during Arnolds time it was all about shape about sculpting the body.

  30. #30
    omen78's Avatar
    omen78 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Charm City
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Prime
    Franco was better built then Arnold but was overshadowed by Arnolds height. Anyone see pumping iron? Franco should have won that olympia! As for MrO 1980 are we forgetting Mentzer??
    I agree. "The Bat" should've won. But thats just the plite of the short guy.

  31. #31
    ross3814 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    608
    i think it would be pretty hard to have 22 inch arms without any tris...

  32. #32
    ross3814 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    608
    Quote Originally Posted by LM1332
    Today top BBs are freaks full of juice. Now all they care about is how big they can get and how many CCs they can shoot before they die. Back then during Arnolds time it was all about shape about sculpting the body.

    or if they live past 30...

  33. #33
    Carlos_E's Avatar
    Carlos_E is offline National Level Bodybuilder/Hall of Famer/RETIRED
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    17,629
    Quote Originally Posted by ross3814
    or if they live past 30...
    Who told you this lie?

  34. #34
    whiteyk's Avatar
    whiteyk is offline Pimp in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    compton
    Posts
    3,568
    Quote Originally Posted by ross3814
    or if they live past 30...

    none of the top bodybuilders are under 30, i think ronnie is like going on 40

  35. #35
    monster.'s Avatar
    monster. is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    DETROIT ZOO
    Posts
    2,217
    Quote Originally Posted by decadbal
    well im gonna start a war now, so here goes. arnold is way over rated, his physique for the time was ok, but still wasnt as great as i read guys make it out to be here. no triceps, no obliques, no legs, his chest and bis. thats it, other than his ego... he has nothing. columbo looked 10x better, so did frank zane as far as symntry goes. so thats my view... let the war begin...lol
    Other then Ronnies Quads, I think arnie looks better.. Anyone can have a GH gut if you run enough of it.. I like to think of it as: Arnie as to Dr. J, as Ronnie to Jordan.. Both very impressive, as far as zane, and columbo should of won - I think not, it's about 'most muscular human' Arnie has more muscle..

    You guys be the judge:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails over rated arnold-d.jpg  
    Last edited by monster.; 04-09-2004 at 11:22 AM.

  36. #36
    Carlos_E's Avatar
    Carlos_E is offline National Level Bodybuilder/Hall of Famer/RETIRED
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    17,629
    Quote Originally Posted by monster.
    You guys be the judge:
    Arnie needs more legs. He's top heavy in that picture.

  37. #37
    monster.'s Avatar
    monster. is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    DETROIT ZOO
    Posts
    2,217
    To me Ronnie looks almost bloated, but he is huge and shredded at 294lbs on stage.. I can't imagine 294lbs with 4% bf.. Thats why i say he is like Michael Jordan to bodybuilding, no body comes close..

  38. #38
    monster.'s Avatar
    monster. is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    DETROIT ZOO
    Posts
    2,217
    Quote Originally Posted by Carlos_E
    Arnie needs more legs. He's top heavy in that picture.
    Yep top heavy is an understatement... Ronnie owns for sure, but arnies lats, arms, calves, chest.. I think he looks better then ronnie..

  39. #39
    Carlos_E's Avatar
    Carlos_E is offline National Level Bodybuilder/Hall of Famer/RETIRED
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    17,629
    Quote Originally Posted by monster.
    Yep top heavy is an understatement... Ronnie owns for sure, but arnies lats, arms, calves, chest.. I think he looks better then ronnie..
    Well, I'm looking at over all symmetry not each individual body part. Being top heavy is glaring at me and I think it's ugly.

  40. #40
    palme's Avatar
    palme is offline Rosie Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    6,589
    Arnold had bigger calves then Ronnie, now thats freaky, how can we have a mr O without calves!?!?

    Arnold is the man, you will all burn for not worshipping him!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •