Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Mealticket's Avatar
    Mealticket is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,812

    test dependant on cycles done or bodyweight?

    Which is. Do you base the amount of test to take on your previous cycle experience or your bodyweight?

  2. #2
    dookses is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    63
    both.

    have a nice day

  3. #3
    Mealticket's Avatar
    Mealticket is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,812
    anyways.....is there a mg/lb ratio that's used as a standard

  4. #4
    dookses is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    63
    not that i'm aware of.. just start somewhere and bump it up if you're not getting the results..

    post your stats up, cycle history, and what you plan on taking, and i'm positive some of the vets will be able to predict what a good dose will be for you.

  5. #5
    musclehead1 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by Mealticket
    anyways.....is there a mg/lb ratio that's used as a standard
    medically there probably is but that most likely doesnt pack on the muscle u would want....and in bb practice it depends how ur body is reacting to ur current/past cycle.....for example if i do test at 250mg ew for 10 weeks on my first cycle and the next cycle i do tha same and i get less results then u'd have up the doseage.......it might not have to be significantly maybe only 10mg a week more (<-----remember this is an example).......but dont do sumthing stupid and increase ur dosage from 250mg to 750 mg ew.

  6. #6
    Da Bull's Avatar
    Da Bull is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    X
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mealticket
    anyways.....is there a mg/lb ratio that's used as a standard
    You'll get arguments on both sides with this question.The low dose advocates will say anyone can grow on 250 mgs wkly of test thier first cycle.Most others will say you have to slowly ramp your doses from cycle to cycle from your previous dose.I've never seen,that I can recall,a ratio for mgs per pound of bw.I'm sure there are theories floating around.maybe someone will post in this thread.

  7. #7
    Mealticket's Avatar
    Mealticket is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,812
    Quote Originally Posted by dookses
    not that i'm aware of.. just start somewhere and bump it up if you're not getting the results..

    post your stats up, cycle history, and what you plan on taking, and i'm positive some of the vets will be able to predict what a good dose will be for you.

    I'm not asking for a cycle critique as i don't use anabolics. I just like learning

  8. #8
    Anhydro78's Avatar
    Anhydro78 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    2,439
    Yeah you make your dose to fit your goals

    small
    medium
    large
    xlarge
    xxlarge

    J/K

  9. #9
    Alex Hunter is offline New Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    16
    You would definately base how much test on your previous cycles. As for by body weight it depends on the person. You know how some people can get wasted off of say.. a tylenol3, while others can take a handful of them with little results. The same applies with steroids .

  10. #10
    sp9's Avatar
    sp9
    sp9 is offline MMA Competition Sentinel
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Land of milk and honey.
    Posts
    3,585
    It is all an experiment on yourself. Since we are all different genetically we all react differently. It would be nice if it were legal and we could get doctors consultations that would specialize in this area. Me, I am definitley doing much better on 600mg test vs. 500mg. I am 6'4" 220lbs though.

  11. #11
    twosocks40's Avatar
    twosocks40 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    down south
    Posts
    653
    Quote Originally Posted by Mealticket
    I'm not asking for a cycle critique as i don't use anabolics. I just like learning

    Sure...(wink..wink)


    -B

  12. #12
    KINGKONG's Avatar
    KINGKONG is online now Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Outside the Walls
    Posts
    3,198
    Ive went to 750 and currently running 500...I think 500 is a good base for most cycles
    Iam gaining more off the 500 than I was off the 750...I will never go higher than 500
    myself again I feel the sides outweigh the gains at over 500 with my body...
    Keep in mind everybody is different some people need 1.5 grams a week to grow and
    don't get any more sides than if they were running 500..IMO try 500 as a base for
    a cycle and if you think you need more than up it.....Iam 24 done many cycles and
    Iam 253 pounds at 5' 10" today just for reference.....

  13. #13
    SportsMedVIP's Avatar
    SportsMedVIP is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    www.ironforlife.com
    Posts
    3,357
    Both, someone weighing in at 150lbs. (5'2") shouldn't use what someone who's 220bls. (6'2") running. Unless of course he's been using for years and isn't egtting results at low dosages anymore. 500mg's is a good startign point that most use. Than everyone has to go from there on their own based on results. In my opinion that is.

  14. #14
    rhapsody's Avatar
    rhapsody is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    138
    Alot has to do with ones own metabolic rate & body composition I believe. As a example if you are 5'10" @ 275lbs but fat lets say 30% then your own bodies estrogen levels are repectively also higher.( in general obese has higher estro's). You may require higher doses but more anti-e's too. A person who is 5'6" at 135lbs Logically will require lower doses. Ones genectics play a role, then only by trail & error you can only say. But start out at a lower/moderate dose but see no results (assumming diet,training is nailed) then up it

  15. #15
    the dent depot's Avatar
    the dent depot is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    1,394
    Quote Originally Posted by K$I$N$G$P$I$N
    Ive went to 750 and currently running 500...I think 500 is a good base for most cycles
    Iam gaining more off the 500 than I was off the 750...I will never go higher than 500
    myself again I feel the sides outweigh the gains at over 500 with my body...
    Keep in mind everybody is different some people need 1.5 grams a week to grow and
    don't get any more sides than if they were running 500..IMO try 500 as a base for
    a cycle and if you think you need more than up it.....Iam 24 done many cycles and
    Iam 253 pounds at 5' 10" today just for reference.....

    Great post! More isnt always better!

    D

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •