-
06-25-2004, 11:56 PM #1
test dependant on cycles done or bodyweight?
Which is. Do you base the amount of test to take on your previous cycle experience or your bodyweight?
-
06-25-2004, 11:57 PM #2Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 63
both.
have a nice day
-
06-26-2004, 12:00 AM #3
anyways.....is there a mg/lb ratio that's used as a standard
-
06-26-2004, 12:02 AM #4Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 63
not that i'm aware of.. just start somewhere and bump it up if you're not getting the results..
post your stats up, cycle history, and what you plan on taking, and i'm positive some of the vets will be able to predict what a good dose will be for you.
-
06-26-2004, 12:06 AM #5Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 532
Originally Posted by Mealticket
-
06-26-2004, 12:07 AM #6Originally Posted by Mealticket
-
06-26-2004, 12:08 AM #7Originally Posted by dookses
I'm not asking for a cycle critique as i don't use anabolics. I just like learning
-
06-26-2004, 12:25 AM #8
Yeah you make your dose to fit your goals
small
medium
large
xlarge
xxlarge
J/K
-
06-26-2004, 06:37 AM #9New Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 16
You would definately base how much test on your previous cycles. As for by body weight it depends on the person. You know how some people can get wasted off of say.. a tylenol3, while others can take a handful of them with little results. The same applies with steroids .
-
06-26-2004, 06:44 AM #10
It is all an experiment on yourself. Since we are all different genetically we all react differently. It would be nice if it were legal and we could get doctors consultations that would specialize in this area. Me, I am definitley doing much better on 600mg test vs. 500mg. I am 6'4" 220lbs though.
-
06-26-2004, 06:46 AM #11Originally Posted by Mealticket
Sure...(wink..wink)
-B
-
06-26-2004, 10:37 AM #12
Ive went to 750 and currently running 500...I think 500 is a good base for most cycles
Iam gaining more off the 500 than I was off the 750...I will never go higher than 500
myself again I feel the sides outweigh the gains at over 500 with my body...
Keep in mind everybody is different some people need 1.5 grams a week to grow and
don't get any more sides than if they were running 500..IMO try 500 as a base for
a cycle and if you think you need more than up it.....Iam 24 done many cycles and
Iam 253 pounds at 5' 10" today just for reference.....
-
06-26-2004, 10:44 AM #13
Both, someone weighing in at 150lbs. (5'2") shouldn't use what someone who's 220bls. (6'2") running. Unless of course he's been using for years and isn't egtting results at low dosages anymore. 500mg's is a good startign point that most use. Than everyone has to go from there on their own based on results. In my opinion that is.
-
06-26-2004, 10:49 AM #14
Alot has to do with ones own metabolic rate & body composition I believe. As a example if you are 5'10" @ 275lbs but fat lets say 30% then your own bodies estrogen levels are repectively also higher.( in general obese has higher estro's). You may require higher doses but more anti-e's too. A person who is 5'6" at 135lbs Logically will require lower doses. Ones genectics play a role, then only by trail & error you can only say. But start out at a lower/moderate dose but see no results (assumming diet,training is nailed) then up it
-
06-26-2004, 11:50 AM #15Originally Posted by K$I$N$G$P$I$N
Great post! More isnt always better!
D
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
Yesterday, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS