Thread: Maybe a dumb ?
-
06-28-2004, 10:22 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 21
Maybe a dumb ?
Im new to this site so dont be too harsh if this is a dumb question. How are better brands of gear distinguished?? If a type of gear, lets say sust for example contains all 4 of those esters in the correct percentages how can ant gear vary on effectiveness? This is also excluding the chance of being underdosed and underfilled. Chemistry is chemistry...right??? just curious
-
06-28-2004, 10:24 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 1,993
I think its all reputation...
-
06-28-2004, 10:34 PM #3New Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 21
Also, I forgot to mention the gear being vet grade or human grade, which i am probably sure that it would make a difference just on the fact that they are intended for animals or humans.
Is there really that much of a difference or is the difference simply a part of different people reacting to different gear uniquely, as everyones body may???
-
06-28-2004, 11:05 PM #4
If dose for dose it is the same, then it will affect the body the same.
-
06-28-2004, 11:23 PM #5
do a search on vet vs human..it has been explained too many times on this site
sust is good if used properly...it needs to be shot ed but hardly anyone does...so if you dont want to do that then a single ester test is better such as enanthade or cyp..it also depends on what exactly your goals are...
-
06-28-2004, 11:56 PM #6New Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 21
I understand about sust vs. single esters, was just wondering about why diff. people claim diff. brands are better, not only on sust but any AAS.
-
06-28-2004, 11:58 PM #7Originally Posted by Want2Bsolid
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
Yesterday, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS