08-04-2004, 12:49 AM #1
Why is it that Prop is more expensive than Enth?
Just out of curiosity, I mean from a business point of view, prop = more shots = more annoying and should cost less. Although it kicks in faster, but Enth is more convenient. I'd like to do prop/tren but prop is quite a bit more, anyone know why?
08-04-2004, 12:55 AM #2LORDBLiTZ Guest
I've never seen prop cost more than enth on any list.
08-04-2004, 12:57 AM #3Originally Posted by LORDBLiTZ
08-04-2004, 12:58 AM #4New Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
08-04-2004, 01:02 AM #5
Are you bros sure you're taking into account the concentration?
I mean on the list prop costs less than enth but only because the prop (most of the time) is 100mg /mL while enth is 250mg /mL, but both 20mL, still less than 1/2 the prop.
ex from a random lab (canadian $):
Test Enth 250mg /mL - $110
Test Prop 100mg /mL - $75
less on the list, but much less product
08-04-2004, 01:16 AM #6Originally Posted by 1-Cent
However, Gram for Gram, Prop powder is cheaper than Enan powder on a couple of my lists.
08-04-2004, 01:19 AM #7LORDBLiTZ Guest
You can't match it mg for mg. It takes just as long to make and it uses more solvents. Just go with the enth.
08-04-2004, 01:34 AM #8
Short acting esters are just as expensive, if not more then long lasting esters. They're in and out of the system and give immediate gains.
IMO, it's like D-Bol. People just buy it for the sake of seeing gains within a week, which means that some suppliers can charge an absolute arm and leg and suckers will pay for it. Why? Because it's immediate results. Many of the first time users want to see immediate results, so why wouldn't suppliers use the pitch...
"This one is more expensive, but you'll feel it within a few days as opposed to the cheaper one that you won't feel for four weeks?"
It's a business. Bastards...
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)