Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 73
  1. #1
    Justincase is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    A happy place!
    Posts
    318

    5000mg of test!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    First off there are some really good guys on this board……This is not directed to you.

    Okay guys I think we need to change the way things are going
    on this board……We can all look up a subject and search on almost any AS
    on this site, that does not mean you know how to use it (everyone is still learning)….people on this site read the Q and A parts and then think they
    are an expert on the subject. I do not post a reply to questions on any AS that I have not done myself, nor do I think people should, if you feel the need to say something then tell them to "read up" or post a link to the
    thread. When I ask a question I would like to hear from members that have done that type of AS…not someone who has read it and is just repeating
    what they have read (as if they have many cycles doing it). There just
    seems to be some members (too many) posting information as if they were
    a subject expert and this should stop. Please guys don’t post to a cycle question unless you, yourself have done it. This would save your time and
    the sites bandwidth.
    JMO.

    Thank you for your time................

  2. #2
    Da Bull's Avatar
    Da Bull is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    X
    Posts
    0
    Couldn't agree more bro.....I've noticed that over this summer as well.I guess ppl feel compelled to post reguritated info even if the have no experience with it.I don't think you can ever stop that tho...it might slow a little when college starts up again.

  3. #3
    Pale Horse's Avatar
    Pale Horse is offline F.I.L.F.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ACLU headquarters
    Posts
    4,556
    Well I agree with Jusincase. If you haven't run a cycle then how can you give first hand knowledge? What kind of reply was that?

  4. #4
    dieseL atC's Avatar
    dieseL atC is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    free crack giveaway
    Posts
    762
    Quote Originally Posted by Justincase
    First off there are some really good guys on this board……This is not directed to you.

    Okay guys I think we need to change the way things are going
    on this board……We can all look up a subject and search on almost any AS
    on this site, that does not mean you know how to use it (everyone is still learning)….people on this site read the Q and A parts and then think they
    are an expert on the subject. I do not post a reply to questions on any AS that I have not done myself, nor do I think people should, if you feel the need to say something then tell them to "read up" or post a link to the
    thread. When I ask a question I would like to hear from members that have done that type of AS…not someone who has read it and is just repeating
    what they have read (as if they have many cycles doing it). There just
    seems to be some members (too many) posting information as if they were
    a subject expert and this should stop. Please guys don’t post to a cycle question unless you, yourself have done it. This would save your time and
    the sites bandwidth.
    JMO.

    Thank you for your time................
    I don't completely agree with you, but you make a good point. There are alot of members on here who post about things that they have no common knowledge about. On the other hand, I don't think everything said on here has to be from a personal experience. That's why we have mods/vets to teach us the information we need to know before we jump into a cycle with compounds we have never used before. I have only used Test E, Prop, Tren , Halo, Clen , ECA but I have done enough research and read enough posts by the geniuses of AR to give my two cents.. But yes, there are alot of people on here who don't know ****, yet they act like they do..
    Last edited by dieselatc; 08-02-2004 at 01:08 PM.

  5. #5
    Pale Horse's Avatar
    Pale Horse is offline F.I.L.F.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ACLU headquarters
    Posts
    4,556
    Bull, AWESOME! Yes too many armchair AS "users" on here with hypothetical knowledge.

  6. #6
    Justincase is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    A happy place!
    Posts
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by pietro75
    shut up. thats all i have to say to you. this board has been here way before you and your opinion and it will be here after you leave.
    Yes it has been and it will be.....but will it be any good? not with people like you.

  7. #7
    builtthekid's Avatar
    builtthekid is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hitting bitches
    Posts
    768
    **** I wouldve of never know.

  8. #8
    Pale Horse's Avatar
    Pale Horse is offline F.I.L.F.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ACLU headquarters
    Posts
    4,556
    If I ever post anything on something I have read here I say for example Da Bull said etc.. or Einstein says... never do I give the pretense that I am the one with the knowledge.

  9. #9
    dieseL atC's Avatar
    dieseL atC is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    free crack giveaway
    Posts
    762
    I just say something like "it's my understanding that.." or "from what I've read.." or "if I'm not mistaken" or...

  10. #10
    BodyMechanic's Avatar
    BodyMechanic is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,745
    i agree. A lot of people post info on stuff like they have done it or they tell younger guys(20-21) that they are too young and you look at their profile and they are 19 and have already done at least one cycle,Now i am not encouraging the use of AS at this age i Myself were 25 when i started.But you have to realize some of these guys are going to do it anyway no matter what you say so give them the right advice.

  11. #11
    hung-solo's Avatar
    hung-solo is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    HEELS 2005!!
    Posts
    3,590
    i am just the local a.r. whore so dont take any of my advice.. unless it has something to do with whoring. then i can help tons.. perhaps enlighten you on the path of rightess whoring..

  12. #12
    Justincase is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    A happy place!
    Posts
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by dieselatc
    I don't completely agree with you, but you make a good point. There are alot of members on here who post about things that they have no common knowledge about. On the other hand, I don't think everything said on here has to be from a personal experience. That's why we have mods/vets to teach us the information we need to know before we jump into a cycle with compounds we have never used before. I have only used Test E, Prop, Tren , Halo, Clen , ECA but I have done enough research and read enough posts by the geniuses of AR to give my two cents.. But yes, there are alot of people on here who don't know ****, yet they act like they do..
    cool so if I need info on tren or halo and clen then I know to come to you.
    just giving you opinion is cool..........you know......

  13. #13
    dieseL atC's Avatar
    dieseL atC is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    free crack giveaway
    Posts
    762
    Exactly, or don't give them any advice at all b*tchs..

  14. #14
    twosocks40's Avatar
    twosocks40 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    down south
    Posts
    650
    So how does this relate to 5000mg of test???? (the title)

    Good point though.

    -B

  15. #15
    Justincase is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    A happy place!
    Posts
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by twosocks40
    So how does this relate to 5000mg of test???? (the title)

    Good point though.

    -B
    LOL ..........I knew people would read it.
    sorry about that guys!

  16. #16
    daos is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    429
    i think the 5000 title was to get everyone and thier grandma to look at the thread. good tactic if thats what it is...

    i agree to a certain extent. if someone does not have first hand experience with it, then i would expect to see a reference along with thier advice. kinda like writing a paper for college, dont take credit for someone elses blood sweat and tears, give credit where its due. show where you learned it from, if possible.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    646
    No Thread Parrots

  18. #18
    ripped4fsu's Avatar
    ripped4fsu is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    2,228
    I agree, I have read a LOT of stuff about a LOT of gear...but since I have only run TEST, Deca , EQ, Winny and D-bol those are the only ones I feel comfortable advising on. if you are going to comment on something you haven't done start out by saying "I have read/heard etc..."

    ~R

  19. #19
    Da Bull's Avatar
    Da Bull is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    X
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by trailrider38
    No Thread Parrots

  20. #20
    dirtdawg's Avatar
    dirtdawg is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    2,327
    there really is no right or wrong way of using aas, my bro is running prop and enth eod, that is not what most people on the board agrees with, but a lot of people he trains with have done cycles like that before, and got great results, its all trial and error, and everyone reacts different

  21. #21
    Pale Horse's Avatar
    Pale Horse is offline F.I.L.F.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ACLU headquarters
    Posts
    4,556
    Please explain thread parrot, my hamster is sleeping and unable to power my brain at this time.

  22. #22
    builtthekid's Avatar
    builtthekid is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hitting bitches
    Posts
    768
    yeah 5000 mgs of test a week would be rediculous as hell
    somebody try it.

  23. #23
    Justincase is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    A happy place!
    Posts
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by dirtdawg
    there really is no right or wrong way of using aas, my bro is running prop and enth eod, that is not what most people on the board agrees with, but a lot of people he trains with have done cycles like that before, and got great results, its all trial and error, and everyone reacts different
    Right.....this is a "It worked for him" thing....
    no one would have a problem with that.....but what if he was now giving out
    info on something he has never done????

  24. #24
    Pale Horse's Avatar
    Pale Horse is offline F.I.L.F.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ACLU headquarters
    Posts
    4,556
    Wait a minute I just got it! I'm okay now!

  25. #25
    Da Bull's Avatar
    Da Bull is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    X
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1victor
    Please explain thread parrot, my hamster is sleeping and unable to power my brain at this time.
    It's when the question was answered in the thread,but around ten more ppl come in and repeat the same exact answer just so they can get a post in the roid forum.You see this all the time when simple questions are answered.makes me laugh when I see the thread get 30 responses all the same to a simple Nolv question.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Where I can find food.
    Posts
    598
    Ive never met a doctor that needed first hand experience to understand the effects of a medication and to prescribe it. What would the consequences be, if I told my HRT specialist, sorry I can't let you help me because you have never injected Test Cyp into your body, so you cant possibly know how it will work in my body.

    First hand knowledge is needed for first hand explanations. How did you feel when you took it? What are you experiences with this drug? Were the results any different on a EQ only compared to Test Only (never did EQ only, so I wouldn't know. I should probably try it before giving advice than, and let someone who has done an EQ only say, "bro dont do it, even though it wasn't as harsh as my Deca only cycle, it still killed my libido". What if the very next guy says, "I ran and Deca only and an EQ only with no problems, so go right ahead." I guess we just hope someone comes along who knows the biochemistry, trends, and has personal experience with the question asked.

    Very few of us would run our cycles under proper controls to determine the clinical effects of running Test only compared to EQ only. We use second hand sources to inductively come up with the most logical answers. I.E. Test is necessary for normal biological functions, EQ doesn't facilliate these biological functions so we can hypothesis the effects of EQ only compared to a Test only cycle. By second-hand studies of the trends in the bodybuilding community we can see if your hypotheses are valid and make further deductions.

    What is an ester? How do they work? How are Lipid profiles affected by Nolva, and how does this effect blood pressure?--This is second hand knowledge. And no one here could accurately know these without second hand knowledge. We study clinical studies, the findings of research scientists, and listen to the advice of educated PPL to find the answers to these questions. And many well educated people can answer these question without first hand experience.

    Now its time for the compromise. It is my experience that the experienced Bros know what they are talking about because they have tried the substance in question and probably studied on the subject in question, which adds tremendous credibility to their answers. However, I see nothing wrong with providing well founded answers, even if the user has not done the subject in question. Maybe for these situations, it is best to start off with a, from what I have read....

    This is just my .02 Maybe I am just being anal because when I get finally get my PharmD (in quite a few years), I would not appreciate someone telling me I am not qualified to offer my advice because I have not had first hand experience with the substance in question. I have got a lot to learn. My first hand experiences are growing more numerous everyday; however, if you wish, I will hold off on any comments when I have no first hand experience. Maybe it will be best to research and get as much second hand knowledge as possible from people with first hand experiences, than when the time is right and I can give my own .02 because I have tried it, whatever it is, myself. Again, I see no problem with someone propogating knowledge, if that someone has done the grunt work to find good knowledge (this makes things easier on all of us trying to research).

    If you look at my posts, especially my earlier ones, you will see that I usually give my .02 with a reference or a link (even if I had tried the substance in question). Is that acceptable?

    When school starts I will be very involved and it will be harder to spend the same amount of time I have this summer studying strictly about AS. Maybe the community will be better without my advice in the long run because I have yet to try DNP , Drol, Halo and various other compounds. Sorry if I offended anyone. But I have tried my best to not give worthless advice. I do my best to PM PPl with new findings after I have come up with more conclusive evidence. Like the time I told someone that breast tissue wont grow back after glands have been removed (I was wrong, and PM'd the bro with the study that show it can come back. But again, I have never had Gynecomastia surgery so I am going off of second hand knowledge).

    I once PM'd Bermich about a time I posted an answer I found on JAMA and PubMed on the effects of Testosterone and Progesterone on sperm production. In the thread, I made myself more clear about the answer as a result (however, on this one I have experience with no condom use (when she was also on the pill) while I was on cycle. Nonetheless, my first hand experience that she didn't get pregnant is worthless compared to secondhand studies of the statistical effectivness of birth control. However, should I have refrained from posting the study because my first-hand knowledge was irrelevant and the bro was not getting a straight answer?

    I really dont know, but maybe my rambling will give you bros something else to work with? Any suggestions I am willing to abide by.

  27. #27
    builtthekid's Avatar
    builtthekid is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hitting bitches
    Posts
    768
    great post.

  28. #28
    Pale Horse's Avatar
    Pale Horse is offline F.I.L.F.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ACLU headquarters
    Posts
    4,556
    No one is saying theoretical or studied knowledge is impractical or unwanted, just that there are some people that spew out info without that, or practical knowlede of the topic at hand some times. Thus the thread parroting statement that eluded me.

  29. #29
    Justincase is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    A happy place!
    Posts
    318
    You are right! but the members of whom I speak will lead others to think that it is first
    hand.......then 6 weeks later they are posting there first cycle......then later a pic...
    (not knocking anyone!!!) but they are 135lbs @ 5'10" and only 19 years old.
    For the most part they don't stick around long......but there are more to take there
    place......I just think they should be called on it.

  30. #30
    beeffreak6's Avatar
    beeffreak6 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Niles Ohio
    Posts
    283
    Bs Is Bs Thats How I Look At It. Take What U Want Out Of From What U Read And Throw Out The Rest.

  31. #31
    Pale Horse's Avatar
    Pale Horse is offline F.I.L.F.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ACLU headquarters
    Posts
    4,556
    That's not a very health approach! To each their own.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Where I can find food.
    Posts
    598
    Quote Originally Posted by dirtdawg
    there really is no right or wrong way of using aas, my bro is running prop and enth eod, that is not what most people on the board agrees with, but a lot of people he trains with have done cycles like that before, and got great results, its all trial and error, and everyone reacts different

    Havent had any experience with that type of EOD prop and Enan cycles. Perhaps that is because by understanding how esters work we can better determine how they will effect plasma levels and therefore hypothesis the best way to run the compounds most efficiently.

    For example, did B6 affect your gains? You can only hypothesis, Yes. That is what scientific studies have concluded. It would be near impossible to determine, through trial and error, whether or not b6 affected gains because there are far too many variables. We go by the best most accurate data available and do everything possible to maximize gains. Trial and Error is very sketchy in leading to well founded answers because there are no controls in our little experiments on our own bodies. As a consequence, I will never have first hand experiences with many things because I choose not to find the way by light of trial and error. I will let others pave that path for me and start where they left off.


    Einstein had a good post about ED vs EOD props shots, trends with first hand experiences. It worth a read:
    http://67.18.108.244//showpost.php?p...8&postcount=39

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    841
    Good; Thought it be YET ANOTHER post about ultra high doses

  34. #34
    dirtdawg's Avatar
    dirtdawg is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    2,327
    Quote Originally Posted by BeefCakeStew
    Havent had any experience with that type of EOD prop and Enan cycles. Perhaps that is because by understanding how esters work we can better determine how they will effect plasma levels and therefore hypothesis the best way to run the compounds most efficiently.

    For example, did B6 affect your gains? You can only hypothesis, Yes. That is what scientific studies have concluded. It would be near impossible to determine, through trial and error, whether or not b6 affected gains because there are far too many variables. We go by the best most accurate data available and do everything possible to maximize gains. Trial and Error is very sketchy in leading to well founded answers because there are no controls in our little experiments on our own bodies. As a consequence, I will never have first hand experiences with many things because I choose not to find the way by light of trial and error. I will let others pave that path for me and start where they left off.


    Einstein had a good post about ED vs EOD props shots, trends with first hand experiences. It worth a read:
    http://67.18.108.244//showpost.php?p...8&postcount=39
    his 8 week cycle
    fina 75 mgs eod
    prop 100 mgs eod
    enth 100mgs eod
    dont know his ancillaries, but this is advice he got from some bodybuilders, they tried this cycle, and got great gains off it, i have seen those guys, one is 6'4 255 and i am guessing this but under 10% bf, all those guys are aware of the active and half lives of aas, and they knoew how esters work,so he is giving it a try, now this cycle could get flamed by a lot of people,but it is getting flamed by people that havent run it, so who is right and who is wrong

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,124
    Good thread. Let's not forget the flip side: those with tons of experience who still have no clue.
    "my boy at the gym is like 285lbs, and he shoots sust 1x every 2 weeks" "everybody reacts differently"

    No they don't....everybody reacts more or less the same. Using AAS will allow you to achieve gains...period. just because you are or have achieved gains, does not mean that there are not a lot more efficient ways of doing so. Like beeffreak said, individual results are pretty meaningless (I'm paraphrasing here). No single person can run enough cycles with any compound to be able to establish a real trend and also account for all the variables.
    The "everybody reacts differently" thing seems to be a cop out for someone doing something that doesn't make much sense and then trying to rationalize it..

    I'll take the advice of an AR member that's only been here a month over your avergage gym monkey, even if the gym monkey is 300lbs. genetics is the main factor in size. it bothers/scares me how many people think that once you reach 250lbs, you are automatically granted a PhD in human physiology and pharmacokinetics. The people that are so quick to follow every word of a pro or any big guy are likely the ones that haven't spent much time in the gym, because anyone who has spent time in the gym will tell you that the most important factors are: genetics, diet, training....then gear

  36. #36
    dirtdawg's Avatar
    dirtdawg is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    2,327
    Quote Originally Posted by einstein1905
    Good thread. Let's not forget the flip side: those with tons of experience who still have no clue.
    "my boy at the gym is like 285lbs, and he shoots sust 1x every 2 weeks" "everybody reacts differently"

    No they don't....everybody reacts more or less the same. Using AAS will allow you to achieve gains...period. just because you are or have achieved gains, does not mean that there are not a lot more efficient ways of doing so. Like beeffreak said, individual results are pretty meaningless (I'm paraphrasing here). No single person can run enough cycles with any compound to be able to establish a real trend and also account for all the variables.
    The "everybody reacts differently" thing seems to be a cop out for someone doing something that doesn't make much sense and then trying to rationalize it..

    I'll take the advice of an AR member that's only been here a month over your avergage gym monkey, even if the gym monkey is 300lbs. genetics is the main factor in size. it bothers/scares me how many people think that once you reach 250lbs, you are automatically granted a PhD in human physiology and pharmacokinetics. The people that are so quick to follow every word of a pro or any big guy are likely the ones that haven't spent much time in the gym, because anyone who has spent time in the gym will tell you that the most important factors are: genetics, diet, training....then gear
    when i said everyone reacts differently,i meant doses, i was speaking of personal experiences, but there were also a lot of other variables like diet and training,we do almost completely opposite routines, me and my roomate did a 12 week enth cycle, i used 500 mgs ew and he used 700 mgs ew, i put on more weight,so i would say we reacted different, but i agree that 300 pound gorillas can be the biggest morons in the world, with enough aas you will grow, i myself wouldnt run a prop, enth, fina eod,

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Where I can find food.
    Posts
    598
    Quote Originally Posted by dirtdawg
    his 8 week cycle
    fina 75 mgs eod
    prop 100 mgs eod
    enth 100mgs eod
    dont know his ancillaries, but this is advice he got from some bodybuilders, they tried this cycle, and got great gains off it, i have seen those guys, one is 6'4 255 and i am guessing this but under 10% bf, all those guys are aware of the active and half lives of aas, and they knoew how esters work,so he is giving it a try, now this cycle could get flamed by a lot of people,but it is getting flamed by people that havent run it, so who is right and who is wrong
    Dirtdawg. Keep in mind that I asked the question towards you as a sign of respect. I would not choose to initiate dialogue with someone not willing to accept new ideas.

    I was prompting a response from you to show that it is very difficult to determine, through one persons experience, if this cycle is optimum or not. Again, by looking at it, of course the bro is going to make gains. The Prop and Tren *should* kick in right away because of the short ester, right? As we know Test E has a longer ester, we know that he really wont feel the full effects of the E until after about week 4 (about the time he will reach maintenance). So what is the best way to run E in this cycle? It seems that the Ester is just going to kick in and he'll be at the doses he was looking for only 4wks and then he'll start tapering down again to start PCT 2wks later. For those 2wks his Test levels slowly decrease, but still remain high enough to keep HTPA shut down. So theoretically, his cycle is really 10wks because the ester is still releasing up til, even past, wk 10. However, the dose will be tapering down, so he will have less Test during this time and consequently less protein synthesis, right? Less efficient maybe?

    So why not Jumpstart the cycle with Prop during the first 4wks as the test E levels are building up. Then stop the Prop and run only Test E. Finish the last 2-3wks with prop only to allow for the Enan ester to clear, which allows for optimum gains right up til PCT. This way PCT is 10wks away from the first injection, just as proposed in the original plan; however, in this way peak plamsa levels are reached the fasted and maintained the most consistanly right up til PCT. Would it not be best to shoot ED as well, because we know it is best to shoot as frequent as possible for best blood levels?

    He is looking for 700mg release a week. To be extra precise, could we calculate the doses of Prop to taper down during the first 4wks as the the Test E levels are releasing more Test than as in the first wk. Or is it better to reach peak levels of somewhere above 700mg during wk4 and taper down to 700mg of E as the Prop ester clears?

    All these questions have answers that could be answered fairly well with logic and proper education (there are many bros that have already gone through this dialogue with themselves, another person, or even a book). There are many rubuttals to my reply and I am positive there is an even better way to run it, which is why I left my answer in question form because I know I am not positive. But we can at least give ourselves a good start with logic.

    Obviosly, I am taking everything to the extreme. There can be no growth if we do not move toward better answers through dialectics. People will disagree and I will disagree with them. However, I like to argue on an intelligent level, which means I am willing to change my mind when I am wrong. Perhaps this is only because I am young and I know that I know nothing at all. At this time in my life, I believe that all I will ever know is only an opinion of something that vaguely resembles the truth, whatever that is.

  38. #38
    dirtdawg's Avatar
    dirtdawg is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    2,327
    Quote Originally Posted by BeefCakeStew
    Dirtdawg. Keep in mind that I asked the question towards you as a sign of respect. I would not choose to initiate dialogue with someone not willing to accept new ideas.

    I was prompting a response from you to show that it is very difficult to determine, through one persons experience, if this cycle is optimum or not. Again, by looking at it, of course the bro is going to make gains. The Prop and Tren *should* kick in right away because of the short ester, right? As we know Test E has a longer ester, we know that he really wont feel the full effects of the E until after about week 4 (about the time he will reach maintenance). So what is the best way to run E in this cycle? It seems that the Ester is just going to kick in and he'll be at the doses he was looking for only 4wks and then he'll start tapering down again to start PCT 2wks later. For those 2wks his Test levels slowly decrease, but still remain high enough to keep HTPA shut down. So theoretically, his cycle is really 10wks because the ester is still releasing up til, even past, wk 10. However, the dose will be tapering down, so he will have less Test during this time and consequently less protein synthesis, right? Less efficient maybe?

    So why not Jumpstart the cycle with Prop during the first 4wks as the test E levels are building up. Then stop the Prop and run only Test E. Finish the last 2-3wks with prop only to allow for the Enan ester to clear, which allows for optimum gains right up til PCT. This way PCT is 10wks away from the first injection, just as proposed in the original plan; however, in this way peak plamsa levels are reached the fasted and maintained the most consistanly right up til PCT. Would it not be best to shoot ED as well, because we know it is best to shoot as frequent as possible for best blood levels?

    He is looking for 700mg release a week. To be extra precise, could we calculate the doses of Prop to taper down during the first 4wks as the the Test E levels are releasing more Test than as in the first wk. Or is it better to reach peak levels of somewhere above 700mg during wk4 and taper down to 700mg of E as the Prop ester clears?

    All these questions have answers that could be answered fairly well with logic and proper education (there are many bros that have already gone through this dialogue with themselves, another person, or even a book). There are many rubuttals to my reply and I am positive there is an even better way to run it, which is why I left my answer in question form because I know I am not positive. But we can at least give ourselves a good start with logic.

    Obviosly, I am taking everything to the extreme. There can be no growth if we do not move toward better answers through dialectics. People will disagree and I will disagree with them. However, I like to argue on an intelligent level, which means I am willing to change my mind when I am wrong. Perhaps this is only because I am young and I know that I know nothing at all. At this time in my life, I believe that all I will ever know is only an opinion of something that vaguely resembles the truth, whatever that is.
    i agree with you beef about starting with prop for 4 weeks and ending it with 3 weeks of prop, i was just showing an example of anothers cycle, if i were to use prop, i would also do ed injects,i am not saying that you are wrong or he is wrong, there are a lot of ways to run cycles, and that was an example of one, i wouldnt run enth eod either, thats just me, i was just throwimg examples out,but this cycle was done by a lot of different people, but these threads are good because you get different views, and your right, all i can do is take the opinion of what resembles the truth, because there really is no definet way to take aas, but some of my opinions on aas use come from other's experiences, and is a factor when i do a cycle, i saw what a deca only cycle did to my bro, i saw what a fina only cycle did to my bro, now i am seeing what a prop, enth, finas combo does,so my question is, do you go by other's experineces, or just do what you read, or a combo of both, for me i needed 20 mgs of nolva ed, 10 wasnt enough, so it kind of is trial and error

  39. #39
    SportsMedVIP's Avatar
    SportsMedVIP is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    www.ironforlife.com
    Posts
    3,300
    You have a good point but there is a lot of info that can be said without having to do it first. Like if someone asked what should they use to combat gyno from their deca only cycle. It's simple to know what they should use wether you've had breasts or not. And if no one with experience has chimed in I'd say it's not bad to advise. But I also say it's good to mention you are not speaking from experience and ask for someone with experience to back it up for you.

  40. #40
    Demon Deacon's Avatar
    Demon Deacon is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Posts
    2,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Justincase
    First off there are some really good guys on this board……This is not directed to you.

    Okay guys I think we need to change the way things are going
    on this board……We can all look up a subject and search on almost any AS
    on this site, that does not mean you know how to use it (everyone is still learning)….people on this site read the Q and A parts and then think they
    are an expert on the subject. I do not post a reply to questions on any AS that I have not done myself, nor do I think people should, if you feel the need to say something then tell them to "read up" or post a link to the
    thread. When I ask a question I would like to hear from members that have done that type of AS…not someone who has read it and is just repeating
    what they have read (as if they have many cycles doing it). There just
    seems to be some members (too many) posting information as if they were
    a subject expert and this should stop. Please guys don’t post to a cycle question unless you, yourself have done it. This would save your time and
    the sites bandwidth.
    JMO.

    Thank you for your time................

    Were you in the Revolutionary war? World War 2? Probably not but if someone asked you a question about it I bet you could give a pretty good answer. I personally dont know everything about steroids . Some steroids i dont know anything about because i decided i didnt need them at this point. But when the time comes and i want to use them i dont care if the info people provide is first hand or if they heard it from someone else. As long as the information is quality advice I dont care who i hear it from.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •