Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Revised cycle

  1. #1
    MonsterRugby's Avatar
    MonsterRugby is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    277

    Revised cycle

    Hey guys thanks for all your input, I've revised my cycle... tell me what you think...

    125 mg of super test 250 (sust) two times a week for a total of 250mg/wk
    300 mg of QV Deca 300/wk

    all proper pct including clomid and nolva..

    my only reason for my revision is that I only have 1 bottle of Equipoise QV 200 left and I don't want to waste it on 200mg/wk... what do think? Keep the 300mg of deca a week, or go ahead for 200mg of equipoise a week? Thanks for the input!

  2. #2
    bignatt's Avatar
    bignatt is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in FL (former Masshole)
    Posts
    2,421
    so write your whole cycle out im confused

  3. #3
    ToJuice,OrNotToJuice is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    197
    If I were you I would run my test at least 200mg more then my deca

  4. #4
    MonsterRugby's Avatar
    MonsterRugby is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    277
    Ah, sorry.


    125 mg of sust 2 times a week for a total of 250mg of sust/wk
    300mg of QV deca 1 time a week

    and proper pct

    or

    125 mg sust 2 times a week for a total of 250mg of sust/wk
    200mg of QV equipoise a week

    both will be a 10 week cycle.. which do you preper? The goal is to gain mass, water retention isn't too big of a deal... and i've never done equipoise before...

  5. #5
    bignatt's Avatar
    bignatt is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in FL (former Masshole)
    Posts
    2,421
    you need to inject sust EOD so....do this get a solid estered test like Test E and run it like this
    Test E 300mg/wk 1-12
    EQ 300mg/wk 1-11 (front load)
    nolva 10mg/ed
    i think you shold lose the deca personally unless oyu have had experience with it before and your sex drive was ok

  6. #6
    BajanBastard is offline VET Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Sust was designed to be released over time (4 weeks). This inject sust eod is foolishness IMO.

  7. #7
    IronRuffy's Avatar
    IronRuffy is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    280
    Quote Originally Posted by big k.l.g
    Sust was designed to be released over time (4 weeks). This inject sust eod is foolishness IMO.
    Thank you... This is topic has to be one of the most heated debates around this forum.

  8. #8
    bignatt's Avatar
    bignatt is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in FL (former Masshole)
    Posts
    2,421
    To keep stable blood levels so the sides are cut down you need to inject it eod from what i have read although BIG if you know any different post a study cause i know you always have some

  9. #9
    bignatt's Avatar
    bignatt is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in FL (former Masshole)
    Posts
    2,421
    I never thought about the EOD thing until i read it on here i have had friends who have ran 500mg twice a week and they did fine i have never really seen any solid data

  10. #10
    seanw's Avatar
    seanw is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Aussie in Singapore
    Posts
    2,296
    Quote Originally Posted by big k.l.g
    Sust was designed to be released over time (4 weeks). This inject sust eod is foolishness IMO.
    Yes I agree. I am just about to start a cycle of sust and I am going to do it twice a week. I am sure the difference is sides will be negligable and the gains will be similar. I have used it before once a week and I got good gains

  11. #11
    juiceinthehood's Avatar
    juiceinthehood is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    2,564
    ppl think bcuz of the prop in it it should be shot ed or eod i dont see why i have used it in the past and shot it 1x a wk. and the sides were normal the gains were great
    btw super test by loefler labs is way underdosed

  12. #12
    BajanBastard is offline VET Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Quote Originally Posted by juiceinthehood
    ppl think bcuz of the prop in it it should be shot ed or eod i dont see why i have used it in the past and shot it 1x a wk. and the sides were normal the gains were great
    btw super test by loefler labs is way underdosed
    That's the main problem. People are only concidering the prop what about the phenylprop and outher esters?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •