11-29-2004, 07:06 PM #1
Difference between 400mg and 600mg Deca? (from experiance)
Can anyone tell me how much difference there is? Based on experiance with both dosages please
11-29-2004, 07:11 PM #2
im presently running it at 600mg/week,i weigh 291lbs and am haveing no sides as of yet(week 6)
11-29-2004, 07:12 PM #3
Better results than 400mg?
11-29-2004, 07:13 PM #4
couldnt tell you bro,im stacking it with 1g of sust,IGF,slin
11-29-2004, 08:51 PM #5
Eat lots of protein. 400 is good but you've got to maintain a positive nitrogen balance or deca is worthless in my opinion. Deca is probably the most dependent on large amounts of protein than any other AAS. I'd rather use tren because I still make good gains while not having to consume 6-7 meals a day.
11-29-2004, 10:27 PM #6
11-29-2004, 10:52 PM #7
There is a 200 mg difference......ok but seriously,I would go 400 like markas said, make sure your getting atleast 1.5-2g of protein per pound for results.
11-29-2004, 11:02 PM #8Originally Posted by dive_kid
11-29-2004, 11:24 PM #9
i would stick with 400 IMO
11-30-2004, 04:55 AM #10Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
In my experience and the experience of people I've talked to, 600mgs/wk is the optimal dose. Over that, the gains aren't much more compared to the increase in sides, and under that the gains are noticably less.
The optimal dose for Eq appears to be 600mgs/week also.
11-30-2004, 02:06 PM #11
11-30-2004, 02:22 PM #12Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- South Florida
I ran it at 600 and it gave me deca D#$% even with 800 of test and i had a real hard time after the cycle with depression. I did get a lot bigger from it but i will not run it that high again and i am only 200 lbs so i am not that big it was to much for me
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)