Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    lookingforquality is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    43

    Can someone clarify for me?

    See a few posts down for updated cycle ideaTHANKS!
    Last edited by lookingforquality; 12-09-2004 at 08:02 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    1,733
    Its not true.

  3. #3
    imann is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    upinyourgirl
    Posts
    496
    I don't know where you read that load of sh*t, ALWAYS run more test than EQ, run higher test levels b/c both AS's will shut down your natutral test production, meaning that you need more "artificial" test to keep your levels high, so that you can make gains.
    The average adult male only produces between 7 and 10 mg of test per day.

  4. #4
    BajanBastard is offline VET Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    I like the cycle. You could bump the Turanabol up to 6 wks if you wish.

  5. #5
    rborwn77 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    315
    Quote Originally Posted by lookingforquality
    I have been researching a cycle and wanted to do:

    1-15: test cyp 400mgs/week
    1-13: EQ 300mgs/week
    1-4: Turanabol 40mgs

    however, I keep readingon this board that the EQ should be equal to a greater than the amount of test one runs on the cycle--why is this and is it true?
    looks good but try to run the EQ 1 more week

    1-15: test cyp 400mgs/week
    1-14: EQ 300mgs/week
    1-4: Turanabol 40mgs

    the reason you stop eq a week before test is so your pct times will match up

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    1,733
    Eq is essentially injetable dianabol . The original literature with dianabol states that 10mgs/day will provide full androgen replacement therapy for a man. The use of Eq at a higher level than test *(i.e. a level which will be providing full androgen therapy).... in light of that fact (and that it is a testosterone derivative) makes running test higher than it unnecessary.

  7. #7
    bignatt's Avatar
    bignatt is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in FL (former Masshole)
    Posts
    2,421
    Quote Originally Posted by rborwn77
    looks good but try to run the EQ 1 more week

    1-15: test cyp 400mgs/week
    1-14: EQ 300mgs/week
    1-4: Turanabol 40mgs

    the reason you stop eq a week before test is so your pct times will match up
    I like this setup

  8. #8
    BajanBastard is offline VET Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Quote Originally Posted by hooker
    Eq is essentially injetable dianabol. The original literature with dianabol states that 10mgs/day will provide full androgen replacement therapy for a man. The use of Eq at a higher level than test *(i.e. a level which will be providing full androgen therapy).... in light of that fact (and that it is a testosterone derivative) makes running test higher than it unnecessary.
    I know that Dianabol is methylated Boldenone but to say "Eq is essentially injetable dianabol" is streching it a bit don't you think? I thought adding a methyl/ethyl group to a steroid dramatically changes the properties of the said hormone.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    1,733
    Ok...forget thet....lets agree that It's a contributing factor.

    I mean...both Eq and Dbol are strong enough androgens and testosterone based. Why would you need to run test at a higher dose than Eq, based on that information?

    And why would you need to run test at more than 200mgs to "replace" your natural levels? AAS can reduce your natural levels of test, but won't "remove" or "lower" injected levels....

    A possible issue can involve a cycle with a progestin or whatever, but I'm sure Eq doesn't need to be run at less than the test in a cycle.

  10. #10
    BajanBastard is offline VET Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Quote Originally Posted by hooker
    Ok...forget thet....lets agree that It's a contributing factor.

    I mean...both Eq and Dbol are strong enough androgens and testosterone based. Why would you need to run test at a higher dose than Eq, based on that information?

    And why would you need to run test at more than 200mgs to "replace" your natural levels? AAS can reduce your natural levels of test, but won't "remove" or "lower" injected levels....

    A possible issue can involve a cycle with a progestin or whatever, but I'm sure Eq doesn't need to be run at less than the test in a cycle.
    Ok I hear you, to be honest i never understood the concept myself. This is something i've wanted to ask you.

    2 cycles, 600mg testosterone enanthate , 400mg trenbolone enanthate or 800mg trenbolone enanthate and 200mg testosterone enanthate. Both cycles are 1000mg total AS intake per week for say 10 wks. The 1st cycle is the more conventional cycle, the 2nd one uses the trenbolone as the base of the cycle and 200mg of testosterone as a replacement for lossed natural testosterone production. Now if one of the progesterone receptor antagonists and aromatise inhibitors are used with both cycles. Would the 2nd cycle be the better one in terms of overall benefits? I know trenbolone is more androgenic then testosterone so would this be a mojor problem? Trenbolone is also a progestin, but as you mentioned it could be a "possible issue" why?
    Last edited by BajanBastard; 12-08-2004 at 05:56 PM.

  11. #11
    BajanBastard is offline VET Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Bump

  12. #12
    lookingforquality is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    43
    ok I have changed the cycle somewhat:

    1-15: Test cyp 400mgs
    1-14: EQ 400mgs
    7-14: Winny 50mg e/d
    PCT

  13. #13
    bignatt's Avatar
    bignatt is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in FL (former Masshole)
    Posts
    2,421
    looks good to me dont forget nolva10mg/day

  14. #14
    tycin's Avatar
    tycin is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vancouver/Edmonton
    Posts
    3,717
    Quote Originally Posted by bignatt
    looks good to me dont forget nolva10mg/day
    i would just keep nolva on hand in case of signs of gyno. no need to run it if u dont need.

  15. #15
    BajanBastard is offline VET Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Quote Originally Posted by tycin
    i would just keep nolva on hand in case of signs of gyno. no need to run it if u dont need.
    It's about time guys stopped with this keep nolva on hand talk. Use the nolva for your cholesterol Bro.

  16. #16
    bignatt's Avatar
    bignatt is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in FL (former Masshole)
    Posts
    2,421
    Quote Originally Posted by big k.l.g
    It's about time guys stopped with this keep nolva on hand talk. Use the nolva for your cholesterol Bro.
    thank you i agreee

  17. #17
    lookingforquality is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    43
    Quote Originally Posted by bignatt
    thank you i agreee
    yeah running it to counter the cholesterol effects of Letrozole
    think Nolva should be at 10 or 20 per day?

  18. #18
    BajanBastard is offline VET Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Quote Originally Posted by lookingforquality
    yeah running it to counter the cholesterol effects of Letrozole
    think Nolva should be at 10 or 20 per day?
    The nolva will lower the letrozole plasma concentrations in your blood by 46% so you'll need to adjust your letrozole dosage to compensate. Stick with 10mg ED for the nolva, 1.5 mg ED or EOD can be used as the letrozole dose IMO.Good luck.

  19. #19
    d.b's Avatar
    d.b
    d.b is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    209
    Dont forget your liver supps...

    peace

    db

  20. #20
    Dimes's Avatar
    Dimes is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,108
    Looks good, good luck.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •