Results 1 to 40 of 43
Thread: Bathroom scale w/bf% reading
-
12-28-2004, 03:42 PM #1
Bathroom scale w/bf% reading
are these things anywhere near accurate at all, i got one and the stinkin thing is telling me i'm around 21% and that sounds high, yeah i have some fat on my stomach and such but comeone now my pictures are posted here if anyone would like to take a guess http://forums.anabolicreview.com/sho...d.php?t=140118
thanx
-
12-28-2004, 03:43 PM #2
In my experience, no they are not accurate at all.
-
12-28-2004, 03:44 PM #3
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- [email protected]
- Posts
- 275
they're garbage
-
12-28-2004, 03:46 PM #4
when are you getting your breast taken out? this is a serious question.
-
12-28-2004, 03:47 PM #5
I agree not even close to accurate they can be off anywhere from 5-10% which is insane.
-
12-28-2004, 03:48 PM #6Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
its not as bad as the picture makes it due to the way i had to hold the camera, but i know its there
-
12-28-2004, 03:48 PM #7
I would say 13-15%
-
12-28-2004, 03:51 PM #8
Those scales do not take in account muscle mass. So if you are overweight because you have a lot of muscle mass (for ex. i weigh 195 5'10 considered overweight) it does not give an accurate reading. Mine was 17% when I was 7%!
-
12-28-2004, 03:54 PM #9
thats one he|| of a differance
i can live with the 15% but 21% was just to much
-
12-28-2004, 03:54 PM #10Originally Posted by Matrix78
-
12-28-2004, 03:59 PM #11
i'm 26 now, i had it looked at by a Dr about 6yrs ago and they said it was just fat, then when i found this place last year i found out what it was, i've cycled 2x now and did use nolva and it kept it in check it didnt get any worse and right now i have letro and nolva and i'm doing another cycle before i get it removed as the other thread says i dont have time or money for surgury and i'm in a wedding in May so i cant be all messed up, but after that i should have the funds and time to have everythign removed and be done with it one and for all
-
12-28-2004, 03:59 PM #12
those things are fed info manually and then spit out a percentage....total witchcraft
-
12-28-2004, 04:01 PM #13Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
-
12-28-2004, 04:05 PM #14Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
-
12-28-2004, 04:10 PM #15
You are going to not cycle then right? you keep refering to this other thread and you still will not listen to advice. third cycle to mess with your body for what looks like only a pound or two. trying to get from 150 to 153? fu@k please stop the insanity. Save that money you are spending on a cycle get your tits removed and cycle all you want as the glands will be gone
-
12-28-2004, 04:17 PM #16
150 to 153? where do you come up with this? i plan to at least put on 20lbs if not more and how does it matter if it gets removed before or after i cycle?
-
12-28-2004, 05:16 PM #17
Don't waste your money bro. How the hell can a machine tell your BF by your feet. Get yourself some real BF testers.
-
12-28-2004, 05:26 PM #18
i needed a new scale but there was no price diff so that didnt matter, so i got it... if i did want to check my own bf% accuratly what would be a "real BF tester"?
-
12-28-2004, 06:13 PM #19Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Florida
- Posts
- 2,886
Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
-
12-28-2004, 07:17 PM #20
Well a scale can't say dick. The charts all read we should weight 20-30% less than we do because it's 30 yrs old or something and doesn't take into account muscle mass.
Ntpadude........you're a jackass. You think he isn't aware and has feelings about his situation. Grow up.
-
12-28-2004, 07:17 PM #21
Meso , I am suprised at you too. A little out of character.
-
12-28-2004, 07:21 PM #22Originally Posted by 1victor
-
12-28-2004, 07:28 PM #23VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
It depends on the type of scale if it uses an electric shock to measure your BF it's accurate within 5% that en't bad IMO.
Now bro this is no flame get that gyno removed before you cycle. I have gyno as well, my natural test levels shot up 3 yrs ago gave me two lumps.
You can cycle if you want but i wouldn't if i were you. Learn to eat and train properly first. Your overall results well be so much better.
-
12-28-2004, 07:48 PM #24Originally Posted by big k.l.g
-
12-29-2004, 07:55 AM #25Originally Posted by 1victor
-
12-29-2004, 08:46 AM #26Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
And as for as doing 2 prior cycles and only being 150, i'm not going to get into it i talked about it in another thread somewhere, simply put, 1st cycle uninformed had small gains but managed to cut bf% down, (i use to be aroun 170 33in waist, now i'm 150 w/29in) and for the 2nd half way in i had tostop it completly due to tests i had to get done that they would not pass me on till i stoped and my prtien and such was "normal" so that fooked me over real good and then i stayed outta the gym for about 4 months and prety much lost anythign i ever had, so... i really consider this a first cycle in terms of how my body is so that really has nothign to do with it..
-
12-29-2004, 09:16 AM #27Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 492
Yeah I got one for christmas, and I thought I was going to weight only 215 pounds cause I quit lifting legs for 9 months but weighted 240 pounds and could not believe it. Yeah at 5'9 240 it showed my bodyfat like 33% which I'm not. Yeah I quit lifting legs cause may quad's and manly the glutes respond to much. Well anyways I love the scale.
-
12-29-2004, 09:31 AM #28
You wouldnt believe it, I bought one of those things just yesterday, what a peice of sh!t. I reckon I am about 17% bf and this poofter of a thing is telling me I am 28%. It does come with a disclaimer that it wont work well with certain types of people and Body Builders were specifically mentioned, and it also mentions not working well for people with water retention, I am on Creatine and just finished my first cycle.
-
12-29-2004, 09:39 AM #29
Why the hell r you guys being dicks? He has the balls to post his pics, he dosent need turds like you guys talking S#$#. WHERE R YOUR PICS. I could shred you probably.
-
12-29-2004, 09:50 AM #30Originally Posted by NoobJuice
-
12-29-2004, 09:51 AM #31
I got one by Triana for XMAS, I just traded it out for one by atlantic Body that measues BF/Water weight, I will tell you all if it is any better. The Triana scale pegs me at 30%, which made me self-conscious as **** for a day. I know Im between 15-20%, because I have had it tested professionaly before at 23%, and I know I'm well below that, oh well.
Originally Posted by seanw
-
12-29-2004, 10:39 AM #32VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by Matrix78
-
12-29-2004, 10:54 AM #33
thats like saying, if u can see someones feet, youll know their bodyfat..its impossible to judge bf by wt alone
-
12-29-2004, 03:48 PM #34
I think they are not accurate but to a certain extent they are consistant. So it is possible to gauge your progress with a Bio-impedance BF scale. It will be a few % all the time. But as you loose BF the scale will most likely show it.
-
12-29-2004, 05:04 PM #35
My scale was 1% off when i did it at home, then had someone do it at the club, so pretty close could jsut be for me though, some scales take into account hieght, weight, age, etc. which could make it more accurate
-
12-29-2004, 06:43 PM #36
which scale is the most accurate?
-
12-29-2004, 07:06 PM #37
bodyfat
is the bodyfat scale under fitness calculators on hear any good??
-
12-29-2004, 07:23 PM #38Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 492
Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
-
12-29-2004, 07:31 PM #39Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
-
12-29-2004, 08:48 PM #40
yea i had one of those scales and it said i had like 16%... then i did a 3 point skin fold and came up with 7.6%. So id say they are not very accurate
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Heart and hair safe summer cycle?
03-25-2024, 07:30 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS