Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
01-04-2005, 06:48 PM #1
Blocking receptors with Nolvadex?
I found this on another board that I am on. What do you think of this?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocking receptors with nolvadex bad?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I had an interesting hypothesis.
Would running an AI like arimidex or femera be more beneficial that stops the conversion of estrogen rather than running a SERM like nolvadex that acts as a weak estrogen still attaching to the receptor thus blocking estrogen but also blocking the androgen?
Would it be more beneficial to keep the receptor open to more androgens and stop estrogen conversion completely. I think more receptors would be left open using this method.
This is a theory based on the idea that to much test converts to estrogen and floods the receptors. If we stop the conversion in theory the receptors should not be flooded by estrogen. This of course in theory also that the estrogen/androgen balance is not hindered as well. I know there has to be a balance.
What you think?
-
01-04-2005, 06:52 PM #2
This question was posted at another board I go to and I responded with:
Then one can argue that the lack of estrogen by the use of an AI would hinder gains as well. Estrogen is responsible for a number of anabolic factors such as increasing growth hormone output, upgrading the androgen receptor and improving glucose utillization.
Also, arent the ER and AR different?
-
01-04-2005, 06:58 PM #3VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
[QUOTE=fitnessNY]I found this on another board that I am on. What do you think of this?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocking receptors with nolvadex bad?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I had an interesting hypothesis.
Would running an AI like arimidex or femera be more beneficial that stops the conversion of estrogen rather than running a SERM like nolvadex that acts as a weak estrogen still attaching to the receptor thus blocking estrogen but also blocking the androgen?
Would it be more beneficial to keep the receptor open to more androgens and stop estrogen conversion completely. I think more receptors would be left open using this method.
This is a theory based on the idea that to much test converts to estrogen and floods the receptors. If we stop the conversion in theory the receptors should not be flooded by estrogen. This of course in theory also that the estrogen/androgen balance is not hindered as well. I know there has to be a balance.
What you think?
There also non A.R based that testosterone is anabolic .Last edited by BajanBastard; 01-04-2005 at 07:04 PM.
-
01-04-2005, 07:07 PM #4Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
-
01-04-2005, 07:11 PM #5VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by TheMudMan
-
01-04-2005, 07:14 PM #6Originally Posted by big k.l.g
-
01-04-2005, 07:27 PM #7VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by TheMudMan
-
01-04-2005, 07:40 PM #8Originally Posted by big k.l.g
No matter how you look at it estrogen is very important hormone in a male's chemestry to stay healthy, and have all functions operate correctly.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
cutting/ fat loss advice needed...
04-16-2024, 01:34 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS