Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1
    impackt22 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Dirty Jers
    Posts
    190

    something other than test?

    What else can I take besides test to get bigger and harder? I like test but I dont like when I am off it. The results are only temporary! I went from 180lbs to 190lbs and now I am back to 180lbs but stronger. thanks for the feedback

  2. #2
    juiceinthehood's Avatar
    juiceinthehood is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    2,564
    bro diet and pct is what will give u keepable gains
    a test eq and winni cycle would give u more keepable gains

  3. #3
    tycin's Avatar
    tycin is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vancouver/Edmonton
    Posts
    3,717
    like said above its all about diet and pct when u come off. if u still eat well and do a proper pct u will b able to keep most of ur gains. and 10lbs isnt that much for a cycle! eat,eat and eat while ur on. run some trib thruout ur cycles, that might help some too.

  4. #4
    juiceinthehood's Avatar
    juiceinthehood is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    2,564
    imo i would do this

    weeks 1-4 prop 70mg ed
    weeks 1-13 test e @ 250mg twice a week
    weeks 1-12 eq @ 250mg twice a week
    weeks 10-15 winni 50mg ed
    weeks 1-15 letrozole .50 ed
    weeks 16-20 nolva 20mg ed
    weeks 16-19 clomid 100mg ed

    but u have to eat to grow 3000-5000 calories ed and 1.5 grams of protein for each pound u weigh ed its the the only way bro
    train and eat hard

  5. #5
    Mesomorphyl's Avatar
    Mesomorphyl is offline Smart Ass Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    7,024
    You only gained 10 lbs. from a 16 week cycle 8 week cruise and another 12 week cycle? How much test were you using??? Post your pct. Are you and your other two friends still premature ejaculating? Here is this thread reference balls are still small and sensitive why?

  6. #6
    Mesomorphyl's Avatar
    Mesomorphyl is offline Smart Ass Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    7,024
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
    You only gained 10 lbs. from a 16 week cycle 8 week cruise and another 12 week cycle? How much test were you using??? Post your pct. Are you and your other two friends still premature ejaculating? Here is this thread reference balls are still small and sensitive why?
    bumping for some answers

  7. #7
    impackt22 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Dirty Jers
    Posts
    190
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
    You only gained 10 lbs. from a 16 week cycle 8 week cruise and another 12 week cycle? How much test were you using??? Post your pct. Are you and your other two friends still premature ejaculating? Here is this thread reference balls are still small and sensitive why?

    I am back to normal for the most part. My cycle was all ****ed up. Forget my old cycle I am still pissed on what I was taking but anyway! I dont want to use test again for aleast a year. Is there anything to take in the mean time that doesnt **** with my test levels???

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    manchVegas
    Posts
    646
    What Type Of Test Did You Take? Whats Was Your Diet And Cycle Like?

  9. #9
    Mesomorphyl's Avatar
    Mesomorphyl is offline Smart Ass Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    7,024
    Still need previous cycle info to give accurate advice, what doses, did you use anything with it, what did pct look like??? You do not have to talk about your sexual problems, but I would appreciate a pm with the attachment of a pic of your girl.

  10. #10
    impackt22 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Dirty Jers
    Posts
    190
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
    Still need previous cycle info to give accurate advice, what doses, did you use anything with it, what did pct look like??? You do not have to talk about your sexual problems, but I would appreciate a pm with the attachment of a pic of your girl.

    All I want to know if there is anything other than test...I cant send the pic, you wont be able to stop looking at her!

  11. #11
    hung-solo's Avatar
    hung-solo is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    HEELS 2005!!
    Posts
    3,977
    sounds like you got fukked! hahahahahaha

  12. #12
    Soup's Avatar
    Soup is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    414
    No Test = No Cycle

  13. #13
    BajanBastard is offline VET Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,418
    Do what meso asked! He is a good and trusted bro!!

  14. #14
    Badgerman's Avatar
    Badgerman is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    A mile High
    Posts
    3,089
    You might find this interesting:::::::

    In support of short cycles w/ no Test or Limited Test

    For all you "must have Test as a base" something to think about....found on another board...

    "Background:
    I began BBing with a trainer from Germany. In educating me, he related to me that, in his time BBing there, European BBers were relatively without American influence. Common practice called for the use of short halflife ester injectables, the variety of which was very much greater than exists today, combined with mild orals like Anavar and Winstrol and, sometimes, Dbol . Short cycles(2-4 weeks) were also the norm. Most interesting, use of test was very uncommon, and considered a horror. What was commonly used was Parabolan , what we, today, call Trenbolone . Eight week cycles were virtually unheard of, and the desire to pack on 20-40 pounds in such a short time was unthinkable. European BBers took a much more unhurried pace of growth. Young, competitive BBers were very much smaller than those found in the US, today, due to this orderly pace of growth. It was only the very rare, genetically unusual BBer who was big at a young age. Europeans simply had a different outlook and different standards.

    Early on, my trainer lamented the situation he found in the US: heavy dependance upon test, long halflife esters used in long cycles, gross overeating, poor estrogen suppression, acceptance of high bodyfat percentages, and excessive lbm development in short timespans. He was horrified at what he envisioned would be the longterm consequences of widespread use of these practices. He was associated with IFBB pros, like Zhur, el Sonbaty, Schlierkamp, and Ruhl, while in Europe. He was well aware of the health complications associated with extreme muscularity. He kept reiterating "BBing is a sport for life".

    While still a natural, I began to examine how an entire philosphy of AAS use might be developed, based upon the European experience. By the time it was appropriate for me to begin AAS, years later, I already had a plan. Initially, I quietly used myself as a lab rat. The results became quite visible, and, before too long, questions followed. My trainer asked that we work together, to develop a new way for his athletes to grow. And here we are.....

    Characteristics of AAS:
    There are two clearly discernable characteristics of interest to BBers. Anabolic : muscle growth/hypertrophy. and Androgenic : strength, aggression, fat burning. Most AAS possess these two characteristics in varying ratios, and in various strengths. For example, Halotestin may be seen to produce a pure androgenic response, but no anabolic response. Deca , on the other hand, will produce anabolism with no significant androgenic response. Test produces roughly a 50 percent anabolic response, and 50 percent androgenic response. Then there is strength of response. Winstrol is a moderate, pure anabolic. Anavar is a moderate, pure androgen. Trenbolone is a very powerful androgen(80 percent of total response), much more powerful than the androgenic characteristics of test. Tren 's anabolic characteristic(20 percent of total response), is weaker than that of test. And so on. I have built a complete table of response characteristics of all the AAS components we use.

    Site injection and localized growth:
    Time and time again, we have seen localized growth response to site injected, esterless and short halflife AAS. I no longer accept that a positive response is anecdotal. It's just too commonplace, in my own work. Consequently, we no longer waste gear in glutes and quads. We identify and then site inject any and all lagging bodyparts, in a rotating injection program. And we have seen some startling responses. In nearly every case, we prefer tren and an esterless AAS, for the most powerful response. There must be weak-, or non-responders, but I have yet to find any. I owe much, in this particular area, to the work of Paul Borreson.

    Cycle design:
    Cycles are assembled by, first, determining the end response characteristics desired, and assembling components whose AAS characteristics interlock together to produce that end response with a minimum of overlap, over the cycle timespan desired. Consider this cycle: Nandrolone phenylpropionate(EOD), tren(EOD), Winstrol depot((ED), optional Anavar(ED). I've remarked, elsewhere, on the desireability of pairing tren with Winstrol. We require the use of a pure androgen for EVERY cycle, to insure strength, onging muscle definition, density, and post cycle androgenicity, so Anavar is our choice for this cycle. Here, Tren is our primary androgen, and nandrolone our primary anabolic. All of these agents are selected for their lack of water retention. All are either short acting or esterless, so that meets our requirements for site injection. And, yes, we do site inject it all. We begin by frontloading the estered injectables, up to three days before cycle day zero, and add the orals and esterless injectables at cycle day minus one. On cycle day zero, the AAS is already active, with blood levels increasing. We end the injectables and orals, suitably in advance of the end of the cycle, so that, on cycle day 15, the AAS is non-inhibitory, and HTPA recovery begins immediately. Add on 14 days further system recovery, and then a cycle can begin anew. Seven weeks, total. Over a year, this might be acccomplished seven times. When HCG , and an anti-e at suitable dosage, are added to the Clomid, the HTPA may be recovered in only 2 weeks. This shortens the next cycle availability point by one week.

    Yes, it's a lot of injections. And the Winstrol hurts.

    What might be expected, in the way of results? Bulking, we have seen as much as 10 pounds lbm. Average is five pounds. Over a year, that's 35 pounds. You say, "Hell, I can grow that much in 8 weeks". I say, let's see how many times a year you can accomplish that, and over how many years do you think you will continue to accomplish that? We have this steady, measured growing, going on and on. My guess is that this approach, using only a modest bulking diet, rather than the typical American pig-out bulking diet, can be accomplished for years and years. Due to short cycle length and rational diet design, there is very little fat gain. No pressing need to cut. No need to look like the typical big, smooth BBer, who only looks cut once a year. Our people are lean, defined, and feel healthy, all the time. They only spend two weeks out of seven(or six), cycling. And, since they get normalized quickly, they can train and grow natural, more quickly, because there is none of the weeks and weeks of getting that slow AAS out of their systems. The BBer doing the typical 8 week long acting ester cycle, exists for weeks in a kind of limbo, where the blood levels are not high enough for anabolism, but are still inhibitory, and he must wait all that extra time. My people are off, longer than they are on. Their bodies, free of drugs.

    We tend to avoid test. Not completely; just most of the time. What we found is that, anytime you use test, it magnifies the sides of whatever you use with it. Tren, used in rational dosages, is relatively free of sides, and causes fewer overall sides during cycles. We use tren, like the typical BBer uses test. With tren, you get much more response, with much lower dosages, with greater androgenic intensity. Someone once wrote that tren was "the gear of the gods". Indeed, the Europeans brought to BBing AAS, a very great gift. We do use test, but only for very specialized purposes.

    We only use one type of eight week bulk cycle. That for Boldenone , which now can only be obtained in a very long halflife ester. We are working with a supplier, and are patiently awaiting him to provide us with our first esterless Boldenone. Testing will begin immediately afterwords, to develop new dosage and protocols, following which, we expect to end our use of nandrolone phenylpropionate. Too many of our clients exhibit some degree of bloat from progesterone aromatization, emerging from the nandrolone. We consider any bloat, from any origin, entirely unacceptable, on health and esthetic grounds.

    Bodyfat gain on cycles:
    Ever notice how productive of muscle, a cycle usually is, during the first four weeks, and how it slows down and bodyfat accumulates, during the second four weeks? You end up eating more, in the attempt to return things to the former rate. More bodyfat. Finally, the whole process slows down for good. What's going on? The common explanation is that you are getting bigger, so that requires more nutrition. We say no. We say the body realizes what is going on, it exhausts and compensates, and body metabolism and developmental processes simply will no longer support this process. But you continue to eat. And that food has got no place else to go, but be turned into fat, with unproductive lbm production.

    Our short cycle designs, whether for 2, 3, or 4 weeks features tren, as a foundation, which is a potent fat burner, due to powerful androgenicity, and will not aromatize to estrogen. And a diet, which is clean, and appropriately sized for rational lbm gain, while minimizing conversion to fat. Later, the body is clean of AAS, and primed for most sensitive and effective response, before the cycle begins. The conversion from nutrition to muscle takes place under optimum conditions, at low bodyfat levels. The AAS ramp-up is swift and full, and the cycle ends before the system can de-sensitize and cause spillover of nutrition to bodyfat.

    Estrogen pileup is another cause of bodyfat accumulation, during the typical 8 week, long halflife ester cycle. I suggest that readers visit the AE zine Issue 46, and download the blood concentration calculator from the excellent article on blood concentration of various halflife esters of AAS. Then, plug in your long halflife ester cycle components, and witness the startling blood level concentrations of what you are injecting, late in the cycle. Using the typical paltry anti-e dosages of the typical BBer, is it any wonder that, late in the cycle, estrogen levels build up out of control, and bodyfat follows?

    Estrogen and anti-e:
    It is an obsolete belief that estrogen is necessary in any cycle. Indeed, ANY amount of estrogen is BAD in any cycle! There is not one study which supports the notion. But the idea lived on in yet another obsolete notion; that water weight is good weight, in a cycle. That, water introduced into the muscle, causes increased lifts, and by lifting heavier, greater growth is obtained. The experts would purposely advise minimal amounts of anti-estrogen drugs, only to minimize the chance of gyno, but to insure lots of this, supposedly, desireable water weight. On the AE boards, I have witnessed these experts advising NO anti-e's, but only to have some Nolvadex at hand, to deal with gyno, should it appear. Not only do you end up with fake strength and fake muscle size, but, at the same time, the estrogen buildup causes high blood pressure, electrolyte imbalance, and a host of health issues. There is water buildup in the lower back to the extent that posts frequently document BBers in pain, cramps, and difficulty, attempting deads. The champions of this approach say "Oh just take some ibuprofen, and you will be just fine". Try asking your liver what it thinks about that approach. Following the cycle, the water disappears, along with the strength and size it fooled the user into believing was real muscle. This often causes depression, and chases the user into a course of Creatine, to re-introduce that fake size and strength. The muscle character appears smooth, and the density is poor. When the BBer diets down, all this is lost, and the truth is seen. It's no wonder that certain other experts advise that BBers never come off AAS, so this scenario may never be exposed for what it is: a rollercoaster of reality versus water weight. I agree with them. It is not healthy to run back and forth between lost size and fullness caused by water weight. But it also is not a good thing to stay on AAS, all the time, either. This is a totally brain dead approach to AAS use. And the BBer who engages in it never attains the quality, defined physique he deserves. It's just alot of smooth water weight and high bodyfat.

    And bodyfat. Everyone should know that the presence of excess estrogen causes fat deposition. The greater and the longer the exposure to elevated levels of estrogen, the greater the bodyfat accumulation. Endos, listen up; stay away from any situation which creates elevated estrogen levels. Everyone, listen up; it is OBSOLETE cycle technology to enable anything but minimal levels of estrogen, at any time. Estrogen is evil, and it is NOT your friend. Using anti-e's cannot reduce estrogen to levels below which the male body cannot function properly. It requires very little estrogen to function, and no anti-e removes it all.

    What to do? Begin, with an entirely different approach. Say that ANY water weight is BAD weight. That estrogen must be banished, to the fullest rational extent. And that the muscle you grow and see is, in fact, muscle, and not water. That the muscle produced will be dense and well defined. A quality physique. How, then does one obtain that increased strength, which the water provided, to enhance growth during the cycle? As stated, we first kill off the estrogen and bloat. Second, we emphasize the introduction of powerful androgens into the cycle structure. I am speaking, once again, of tren and anavar. Together, these components make you VERY strong. And with NO bloat or estrogen required. The concentrated androgenicity encourages intense, aggressive workouts, while also encouraging fat burning. It is very commonplace to observe body recompositions during such cycles. In other words, you get big and lose bodyfat, simultaneously. The androgenicity also produces significantly increased muscle density and definition. At cycle end, what you end up with, is the real deal. Solid muscle, growth, and increased definition. No need to rush to the nearest container of creatine to stem your losses. And that strength is yours, to keep. And no test.....

    Now, go back to that blood concentration calculator, and compare the blood concentrations of the typical 75 mg EOD of tren, to what you were subjecting yourself to, with that long halflife ester cycle. No stress caused by estrogen pileup, either. Now, you tell me which alternative is better.

    What do we use to suppress Estrogen? Well, we formerly used grams of Arimidex per day. Arimidex is now an antique for us. We use Femara. We prefer one 2.5 mg tab ED. Our clients are kept dry as a bone. We will begin to study Aromasin , in mid-September. Aromasin utilizes a different approach to Estrogen control, which promises to be even more powerful than Femara. But research indicates that IGF-1 production is not suppressed by Femara, but may, in fact, be enhanced by it. We do not see that with Aromasin. Time and experimentation will tell.

    Most importantly, we keep our people on anti-e, post cycle, during the HTPA recovery process, and later. This both speeds recovery of the HTPA, as well as minimizing fat buildup, while hormone levels fluctuate wildly.

    Androgenicity and quality:
    BBers commonly justify their long cycles by saying that they need the long cycle to enable "consolidation". They observe that this effect only occurs late in the cycle. Why is this? It's because the androgen level of the Sustanon test, typically used, takes that long to pile up and affect the muscularity of the BBer. But what about Trenbolone? Almost without fail, users commonly report density and hardening to appear within a few weeks. Why is this? Because the androgenic response of tren is so much more powerful than that of test. You can get this response to produce quality muscle at dosages of only 75 mg EOD, in less than a month. In a Sustanon test, it takes many weeks to accumulate an immense blood concentration, to achieve the same result. It is commonplace to observe tren users burning fat, while they cycle. Sust users never report this effect. Why? Once again, the androgenic response of tren is so much greater than that of test. Intense androgenicity induces fat burning. If Anavar is added, the androgenicity effect is intensified, still further.

    Ever hear of the term "muscle maturity"? It describes muscle which is dense and defined. The commonly accepted belief is that it takes years and years to acquire this muscle characteristic. But why? Because, using test, the exposure to the muscle hardening androgenicity only occurs for about two weeks in the typical long cycle. And that cycle can only be repeated a few times a year. In the tren/anavar-based short cycle, the exposure to muscle hardening androgenicity occurs for longer periods, and the cycle can be repeated many times a year. "Muscle maturity", and quality, appears with rapidity, and not with years and years. I see muscle quality in only one year of regular short cycling, which I never see in the typical long cycle BBer, unless it occurs for years. Which would you prefer?

    The issue of health:
    There are those who say the typical American method of cycling, using long acting ester cycles, for 8 weeks or more, and eating 7-10,000 calories per day, for all that time, is no danger to health. To that, I say this: in the millions of years of human evolution, at no time, ever, has the male of our species been exposed to the barrage of hormonal, metabolic, and developmental pressure and manipulation, as occurs during the long acting ester eight week cycle. Do you really believe our bodies were engineered and evolved to deal with this attack, as well as the stress of being forced to add 20-40 pounds of lbm and bodyfat in this same timespan, over and over, again? Don't be a fool. If you believe so, then you are whistling past the cemetery. And there are additional fools, who would have you believe that staying on this course, continuously, can do you no harm. This is, currently, an unprecedented, uncontrolled lab experiment, taking place all over the world, with thousands of men as lab rats. The long term outcome cannot be predicted by anyone, today. True, every single one of us will die, someday. My people and I have no intention of hastening the arrival of that inevitable day, just to look big in a coffin, as we are laid to our eternal rest. What the hell is YOUR hurry? And, what if you don't die? What if you are forced to leave your beloved sport, and spend the rest of your days, living with hypertension and heart damage due to tachycardia. And kidney damage caused by the hypertension. And still other health issue possibilities. Is this any way to live? It's a personal value judgement and risk assessment process. Step back for a moment, and re-evaluate your position and priorities.

    The end game:
    One other matter, which few consider. Everyone has a genetically pre-programmed maximum of lbm, which their body will suppport, regardless of whether you reach it, via AAS. The faster you approach it, the sooner your gains will decline, no matter how much juice you cycle, and how often you cycle it. You will end up spending money, juicing larger quantities of gear, and stressing your body, for diminishing returns. Finally, you are tapped out. All the slin, growth hormone , IGF-1, and whatever else you toss at it, will never get you past that limit. In a minority of individuals, they will attain immense lbm gains, over time. The rest of us, face the remainder of our BBing careers, re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. All we accomplish is staying right where we are, until we leave the sport in frustration.

    BBing is a sport for life. Why exhaust yourself and your body, in a hurry to arrive at the end of the journey, earlier than you need to? I'm 48 years old, and I look forward to growing and growing, for as long as I remain in the sport. We have a 65 year old client, who last competed 11 years ago. We did a few short cycles with him, dieted and prepped him, and he walked away with a second prize trophy, healthy and happy. Have any of you ever considered that you might still be able to lift and compete at that age? You better forget it, if all you can think of is slamming on endless pounds, today and tomorrow. Your time in BBing will either end in poor health, or the frustration of having reached your limit, and going no further.

    Summary:
    I have presented, above, only the most basic introduction to my philosophy and approach to short cycling, and offered only a simple example out of a program which I spent years developing. I have devised an entire series of special-purpose cycles, each of which embody most, if not all of the above principles.

    The purpose of the short cycle is to employ moderate dosages of short halflife ester and esterless injectable and oral AAS, combined with moderate and healthy diet, to promote moderate stress anabolic growth, over time. This same process results in very high quality muscle production, which only increases with each cycle, and minimal health impact. It assumes a long term outlook. It is intended for the mature and rational BBer, who expects to remain in the sport for the rest of his life. If you truly love BBing, you never want to leave, and you want to keep your interest and grow, then consider how the short cycle might be what you need for your future in our beloved sport.

    Finally:
    I want to take the time to publically thank my very special friends and clients, who put their faith in me, and assisted me by using my protocols. Through their invaluable feedback and experience, they enabled me to refine and perfect my overall program. Without them, this all would be nothing but theory. Some are former and present members of this fine board.

  15. #15
    ST240's Avatar
    ST240 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    128
    wow thats an interesting read..... is there anyone out there whos done a cycle without test and had positive results. My buddy was telling me to run a small dose of tren on its own (not fina)

  16. #16
    saluu's Avatar
    saluu is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    629

    good read

    i agree test is all bloat but u need test in any cycle to enhance mood and the feeling of well being and deca and tren has high progesterone levels so test is needed and hpta shutdown is hard so test is a must if u wanna keep gains you can always control bloat of test by taking estrogen. Their is no scenitfic data saying longer cycles are better than shorter and vice versa but for eq and deca it takes a good month before it kicks in so the half life of the steroid you are taking also important wheter u do a long cycle or not . I agree with you that gains from high androgens are easier to keep such as tren anvar and winny and u get less bloat and zero coversion to estrogen and these steroids are underrated . but test is still the king when it comes to bulking . personally i do 12 weeks cycles or ten weeks these cycles are not to long not to short. and use pct always. it is true that u lose gains with test but not all ur gains if you do proper pct. qualitively speaking nothing beats tren burn fat no bloat zero estrogen conversion but it is strong androgen and strong adrogen shutdown the hpta hard so u need test no matter what . i like winny to and anavar as well. i believe test is overrated no doubt it is alot of fake mass but u do retain some gains and the great feeling u get on test cant be beat . peace later but great post but u need test in every cycle it is not a cycle without test bro.

  17. #17
    spooledup's Avatar
    spooledup is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    444
    Quote Originally Posted by ST240
    wow thats an interesting read..... is there anyone out there whos done a cycle without test and had positive results. My buddy was telling me to run a small dose of tren on its own (not fina)
    You've got to be kidding me?

    There are lots of us that don't care for test and don't use it and still have great results. It's really scary how there are so many people that say you have to have it when IMO its the worst AS out there.

    No test no cycle?? Bwhahahahaha!!

  18. #18
    spooledup's Avatar
    spooledup is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    444
    Quote Originally Posted by saluu
    i agree test is all bloat but u need test in any cycle to enhance mood and the feeling of well being and deca and tren has high progesterone levels so test is needed and hpta shutdown is hard so test is a must if u wanna keep gains you can always control bloat of test by taking estrogen. Their is no scenitfic data saying longer cycles are better than shorter and vice versa but for eq and deca it takes a good month before it kicks in so the half life of the steroid you are taking also important wheter u do a long cycle or not . I agree with you that gains from high androgens are easier to keep such as tren anvar and winny and u get less bloat and zero coversion to estrogen and these steroids are underrated . but test is still the king when it comes to bulking . personally i do 12 weeks cycles or ten weeks these cycles are not to long not to short. and use pct always. it is true that u lose gains with test but not all ur gains if you do proper pct. qualitively speaking nothing beats tren burn fat no bloat zero estrogen conversion but it is strong androgen and strong adrogen shutdown the hpta hard so u need test no matter what . i like winny to and anavar as well. i believe test is overrated no doubt it is alot of fake mass but u do retain some gains and the great feeling u get on test cant be beat . peace later but great post but u need test in every cycle it is not a cycle without test bro.
    Where did you get this crap??

  19. #19
    ST240's Avatar
    ST240 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    128
    Quote Originally Posted by spooledup
    You've got to be kidding me?

    There are lots of us that don't care for test and don't use it and still have great results. It's really scary how there are so many people that say you have to have it when IMO its the worst AS out there.

    No test no cycle?? Bwhahahahaha!!
    are you being sarcastic?? if you arent , what cycles have you ran?

    edit: (non test cycles i mean)

  20. #20
    Muscleone is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    157

    Test

    Welcome to the rollacoaster ride. Try Deca or EQ. You may also try Primobolan .


    Quote Originally Posted by impackt22
    What else can I take besides test to get bigger and harder? I like test but I dont like when I am off it. The results are only temporary! I went from 180lbs to 190lbs and now I am back to 180lbs but stronger. thanks for the feedback

  21. #21
    ST240's Avatar
    ST240 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    128
    deca on its own??? thats gotta suck -> deca dick to the max

  22. #22
    BIGJ22 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    16
    Thats All A Part Of Takeing Juice. Theres Some Post Cycle Supplements You Can Take To Help Yea Out But Your Always Gonna Lose Most Of That Weight Especially With Test. Your Results Are Mostly Water But You Will Come Out On Top With Strength Gains Like You Said. Go With Some Finaplix . Good Shit It Will Rip You Up Nice And Put On Lean Muscle That Mostly Will Be Kept. Make Your Own Its Cheap As Hell And Worth Every Penny That You Spend On It. Deca Isnt A Bad Choice Either But Its So Over Priced And Def. Isnt As Good As Tren . Check It Out Good Luck Man

  23. #23
    hardrock3 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    96
    I ran an EQ only cycle at 400mg/wk for 2 weeks, then 600mg wk for 10 weeks with great success, with proper pct after you should keep all your gains.

  24. #24
    Diezed is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    149
    "I ran an EQ only cycle at 400mg/wk for 2 weeks, then 600mg wk for 10 weeks with great success, with proper pct after you should keep all your gains."

    how much weight did u gain?

  25. #25
    Diezed is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    149
    i just realized this thread is 7months old

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •