Here is the Lab results fresh from the lab.. As I promised
So for all of the guys that said his gear was bunk CHECK IT OUT!!!!
You were WRONG!!
254mg/ml
Printable View
Here is the Lab results fresh from the lab.. As I promised
So for all of the guys that said his gear was bunk CHECK IT OUT!!!!
You were WRONG!!
254mg/ml
Thanks bro!!!!! Looks great. Hopefully we can end this and all get along!!!!!
I'm glad that your batch turned out to be good. Surprising to see that it was so close to 250/mL instead of the conventional 300mg+.Quote:
Originally Posted by getinbig
May wanna blur out the lab name too
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hedzilla
Forgot to do that... Updated..
**** its blurry! so what did it come out to?
Save it to your desktop. It will be very clear.. 254mg/mlQuote:
Originally Posted by chevyboyzcry
Man that's GREAT news! The only thing I don't understand is why someone posted their lab test for that same batch 1105 and it cam out to be around 325mg/ml??? If it's out the same batch it should have matched the other lab report, UNLESS the other lab report was tampered with or something? Oh well, at least we know it's legit now.
:elephant: :banana: :elephant: :banana: :lift: just a bump..Quote:
Originally Posted by GetPumped
How odd...in the originally posted lab tests (tested by Df, I believe, but posted in a now deleted thread by Buff).... DaVinci's Lot #1105 tested out to be 325mgs/ml.
good to hear. goes to show how little "lot #s" from UG labs mean.Quote:
Originally Posted by hooker
hate to be the one to say this but, I TOLD YOU SO! :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by chevyboyzcry
Its good to be able to say that isn't it... :lol:
Not to start this chit storm of a thread AGAIN, but does anyone
care to explain why the original Lab Test for DL Lot #1105 Test
Ent posted back in Oct and dated for 10/28/04 came out as a
different dose of 320mg/ml or 325mg/g compared to yours that
came back at a much lower amount???
I'm not trying to bad mouth DL, but you have 2 Lab results with
2 different results and the results are quite different... Here's the
test that was posted before for the same Lot# 1105...
It's nice to see it came out as labeled, but does anyone care
to explain why there are 2 different results for this same Lot#???
Quote:
Originally Posted by getinbig
For all you talking chit I'm waiting for an anwser that makes sense to my question?
Hmmmmm, although we know it's legit now, it is kind of fishy that the SAME batch numbers came out with two DIFFERENT results (not even close to each other)??? Does anybody have any idea because if they came from the same batch number, then their concentration should be the same.
I have a very good idea and I bet I'm right about it, but it doesn't
make it right... Still waiting for someone to step up, comeon we're
all big boys here... Someone must have an anwser for this question?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GetPumped
I think I can explain it... :rolleyes:
Most UG labs, just put lot number on the vials for looks and to make it easier for customers to resale the product, when in all actuality, the numbers are either random, or all the same, not necessarily corresponding to the same batch.
Well I think someone with a logical explanation should share it with us since we are all wondering the same thing? The ONLY thing I can think of is that it was independently tested this time and the other tests came from someone associated with DL and therefore the results could have been tampered with a little to show its a strength of 320mg/ml to make it looked VERY overdosed. This is ONLY a thought, anybody else got a different idea???
Or...they send in one bottle to be tested, which they made purposely overdosed, and then reap the profits made by the rigged test.
Funny because I know a few UG's that actually use different
Lot# for each batch, the way a licensed company would do it,
but you are right about what you said, but it still doesn't make
it right...
You see a lab test for a batch and you think that's what you're
taking, but you're not, so then what's the point of even having
a Lot# or doing the test in the first place if that's how they are
going to run their business? Makes you wonder doesn't it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by spound
sounds to me like he is making multible batches and just using the same lot# label
How else could you explain such a difference? That's a 70+mg difference between the two.
You could say it was just the lab if it were +/- 5mgs.. but 70mgs.. naaa
This just gets deeper and deeper :scratch:
There's only two possible anwsers and this is the one of them...
I know it happens alot with alot of UG's and the other anwser is
they either do their labels way in advance or pay to have them
done by someone in bulk in advance and just label every batch
or alot of them with the same Lot# no matter what batch it is...
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooker
I think he purposely made one overdosed bottle, sent it in for testing, and then claimed the whole batch was overdosed. And tried to reap the profits....and was found out.
Yes it does, read my post above, it's either one or the other...
Either one is wrong and bad business IMO, but then what do
I know... :rolleyes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeanMeOut
That's personally what I think it is too, but that's just as wrong as
what hooker is saying, either way you have no quality control or any
idea what you are taking, so all those from Oct '04 that saw the test
with 320mg/ml and thought they were taking that, could have been
taking anything... Makes no sense either way... It's not that hard to
get it right...
Oh well at least the 2nd time it still tested out overdosed...
Quote:
Originally Posted by basskiller
I suppose...they can either be:
A. Totally full of it, and rigging over-dosed tests.
-or-
B. Totally inept, and mislabeling their own different batches with the wrong lot #'s.
I would like to point out another very important factor. Why the hel! does everyone miss the fact that it IS OVERDOSED???? I dont get it? Is that supposted to be a good thing? Like any business where people care whats in the product, when the contents of the product are NOT what the label claims... That is total B.S.!! How can it be 70mg off EVEN IF IT IS NOT THE SAME BATCH??? That is crazy. Not hating... just making a point for the discussion.
Bc
Yeah it's either one or the other...
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooker
Very good point...
Personally maybe a 5% overdose is no big deal, but if it's labeled 250mg/ml
and it's really 320mg/ml, then that's a big difference... Even though it's not
enuf to really hurt you with testosterone, there are other drugs that if they
were overdosed that much could kill you... That's roughly 30% overdosed...
Quote:
Originally Posted by system admin
Good point. What if you overdosed all of your MRP's and protein powders by that same 30%+? And what if someone tried using them in precontest dieting? And was taking in an additional 1/3 of their daily calories? They'd never be able to diet down properly. Overdosing, is just as bad as underdosing.Quote:
Originally Posted by system admin
What if you are a bit sensitive to test, and thought you were taking 500mgs...but were really taking 650!?!?!
"Gyno, party of two...your table is ready..."
But it's even worse...it is the same batch...Quote:
How can it be 70mg off EVEN IF IT IS NOT THE SAME BATCH???
wow hooker is just rippin on dl! must have a hard on for the guy or something! lol jk dont take it personal hooker but hey your a hooker so its all good
I dont see it as busting on anyone. It is a fact. Over dosing is just as bad as under dosing. Why not just say "bottle of Testosterone ?" Instead of Test 250mg?
This could be the slogan:
"With each injection, you never know HOW much you get!!!"
or
"Always a surprise inside!!!!"
:) ahahahahaha
I can see it now... all over late night television!
Again.. not hating... just enjoying the thread.
Bc
How do you think those tests ended up being different?Quote:
Originally Posted by chevyboyzcry
I think he's just stating facts... I mean you don't care if someone you
are buying from is doing one of the two things mentioned??? I know I
would...
Quote:
Originally Posted by chevyboyzcry
This stands to be the most entertaining thread of the week for sure... :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by system admin
We all know that DaV rigged the overdosed tests which were originally posted here...c'mon now....
ya man got me thinkin twice! maybe jay leno could explain!