Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    MER's Avatar
    MER
    MER is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    642

    Im flaming mad. Underdosed Galenika test...

    Well I bought a 20 week cycle of test e Galenika and i did research on my batch number and the 250 mg amps are underdosed to 180. Now I think I'll almost double 4 amps a week which I thought were going to be 1000 mg to 5 amps to make up for the underdosage. What do ya'll think? Batch number is 15820482

  2. #2
    The Shredder's Avatar
    The Shredder is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    279
    Did you just do a search for the batch number to find out if it was under dosed? I have Galenika to but not that number.

  3. #3
    MER's Avatar
    MER
    MER is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    642
    No I looked at many boards including this one and saw an actual lab test result.

  4. #4
    Iowa's Avatar
    Iowa is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    By a bunch of cornfields
    Posts
    1,336
    I had a friend do Galenika test roughly 6 months ago. He was very disappointed to say the least.
    If I were you, Id try to "pawn" that off and get something else. Thats a lot of volume for an inferior product. JMO of course.

  5. #5
    MER's Avatar
    MER
    MER is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    642
    my source only has galinka for test. what about nutrivet? any comments?

  6. #6
    The Shredder's Avatar
    The Shredder is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    279
    Maybe you can work something out with your source, possible new batch.

  7. #7
    MER's Avatar
    MER
    MER is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    642
    As far as I'm concerned I'm done with galenika and thats all he carrys.

  8. #8
    Jack87's Avatar
    Jack87 is offline Retired Vet
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    6,086
    Not sure if this helps, but here's a lab test for lot# 0020
    That tested out at 179mg/ml, but these bad batches were
    suppose to be made way back in '03 so they should be
    just about out of circulation by now...

    Newer batches are suppose to be much better and I have
    used some as of a few months ago and they were fine, but
    they are still getting some mixed reviews and feedback...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Im flaming mad. Underdosed Galenika test...-icn_lab_test.jpg  

  9. #9
    MER's Avatar
    MER
    MER is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    642
    well the manufactur date is 0902 0907. But it's still the same batch thats marked as bad from what everyone tells me. Should I just drop them in the middle of my cycle and go with nutrivet? I'll add 5 weeks more into my cycle because thats how far I'm into it. My deca (norma) is good though.

  10. #10
    Jack87's Avatar
    Jack87 is offline Retired Vet
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    6,086
    You don't really want my opinion on nutrivet do you?
    I would perfer to use underdosed ICN's before that...
    Just my opinion, that's all...

    Quote Originally Posted by MER
    well the manufactur date is 0902 0907. But it's still the same batch thats marked as bad from what everyone tells me. Should I just drop them in the middle of my cycle and go with nutrivet? I'll add 5 weeks more into my cycle because thats how far I'm into it. My deca(norma) is good though.

  11. #11
    MER's Avatar
    MER
    MER is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    642
    You got a PM buff

  12. #12
    The Shredder's Avatar
    The Shredder is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    279
    yo buff you got any info on batch# 0416 & 0415 manf. date 0204.

  13. #13
    Jack87's Avatar
    Jack87 is offline Retired Vet
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    6,086
    Sorry bro, no I don't...

    Quote Originally Posted by The Shredder
    yo buff you got any info on batch# 0416 & 0415 manf. date 0204.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    1,733
    On the negative side, you have a product that isn't what you wanted it to be...

    -but-

    On the plus side, you can contact some DaV reps, and maybe they can come up with some creative reasons to explain the dosing discrepancy. It'll be good for a laugh...

  15. #15
    GetPumped's Avatar
    GetPumped is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    1,083
    Quote Originally Posted by hooker
    On the plus side, you can contact some DaV reps, and maybe they can come up with some creative reasons to explain the dosing discrepancy. It'll be good for a laugh...
    LMAO!!!! That has to be the funniest thing I have read on here in a while.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •