Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    jgg1221 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    vagina
    Posts
    840

    retainability of equipose gains

    on a scale of 1 to 10

    how retainable are the gains from equipose

    1 being worst

    10 being best


    ive heard varying opinions in profiles of equipose around the net and im curious about opinions from those whove actually takin it

  2. #2
    bullram's Avatar
    bullram is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    armpit of the country(NJ)
    Posts
    578
    10 with good pct and diet

  3. #3
    tycin's Avatar
    tycin is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vancouver/Edmonton
    Posts
    3,717
    with a proper pct and remaining on a good diet u will b able to keep most of ur gains on anything IMO...other than the water retention of course.

  4. #4
    Consistency's Avatar
    Consistency is offline Extraordinarily Exorbitant
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Tenn
    Posts
    4,286
    9 again with proper pct

  5. #5
    joevette's Avatar
    joevette is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,084
    It's not possible to say unless you find people who have run eq by itself. Most run it with test, so how do you know how much weight came from each roid?

  6. #6
    1-Cent's Avatar
    1-Cent is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Canada, Eh
    Posts
    2,389
    I think a lot of people confuse retainability of muscle fiber with losing water weight at the end of the cycle. The reason EQ is known for giving keepable gains is because you gain very very little water while using it, probably less than a pound for most people, same with Tren which also has the same reputation as being a lean and keepable mass builder. When really if you took a stack like Test/Deca /Dbol blew up 30lbs and pissed away 10-15lbs leaving you with 15-20lbs, that would still be comparable to the 15ish pounds you would keep in an EQ or Tren cycle. The difference being you wouldnt piss anything away, you still end up with the same gain in muscle mass except you see yourself losing size in one of the cycles and call the gains less keepable.

    Duration, dosage and diet makes more of a difference than what you take in particular as long as you use the core AAS drugs like Test, Deca, EQ, Tren, etc. There are other differences though, some give more strength, some are thermogenic and make you lose fat, make you more vascular, others will give you raw size but more water...

  7. #7
    Big_Lex is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    162
    Tren on the other hand does not convert to estrogen at all the structure doesnt allow it where EQ still aromatizes 25% to test. Water retention is very possible on EQ for individuals sensitive to estrogen but unlikely. So in keeping the gains id give it a 8 to 9 but just the fact that EQ increases the apetite so much gives it a 10000 +.I love EQ and i always use it in my cycles instead of deca . They both use same receptors and deca i find makes me fluish and has a bad effect on the nuts. Love EQ and dont waste time with dosages under 400mgs a week and shorter than 10 weeks

  8. #8
    groverman1's Avatar
    groverman1 is offline Cross Dressing Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Motor City
    Posts
    2,548
    8-9 proper PCT and diet is key.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •