Thread: DECA VS. EQ (again)
-
01-15-2005, 08:37 AM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 54
DECA VS. EQ (again)
I've researched on keeping gains with Deca and Eq. I've read that keeping gains with Eq is easier and vice versa. The effectiveness chart on this site says that Deca is easier to keep. Which is it?
-
01-15-2005, 08:42 AM #2Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 162
they both use the same receptor and are quite similar as far as ive realised. i just eat better and feel better on EQ as far as gains go well pretty much the same for me.
-
01-15-2005, 08:52 AM #3
Some of the gains from deca will be water.......... so when the cycle is finished that water will be purged. EQ gains are more quality gains because you will holde very little water from the use.
The ability to hold on to your gains from AAS is how well you plan and run PCT.
-
01-15-2005, 08:57 AM #4
I would run EQ over deca anyday
-
01-15-2005, 09:14 AM #5Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 54
Bump
-
01-15-2005, 09:18 AM #6VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Both are good cutting drugs if you use the right ancillaries.
-
01-15-2005, 09:24 AM #7VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by Big_Lex
-
01-15-2005, 09:24 AM #8Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 54
which gains are easier to keep, knowing that pct is done correctly?
-
01-15-2005, 10:33 AM #9Originally Posted by Reciever84
It all depends of the person and their diet, training level, genetics, etc. post cycle.
There are many factors involved in retaining gains. It usually isnt the actual steriod .
I mean obviously certain gear makes you retain more water than others, which when discontinued can cause the appearance of losing gains.
If you eat to maintain size and dont over train you should keep your gains no mater the cycle. Let me re-phrase...your should keep all your new muslce.
-
01-15-2005, 10:44 AM #10Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 162
Originally Posted by big k.l.g
-
01-15-2005, 11:33 AM #11
EQ 4 Me, I won't ever run deca .
-
01-15-2005, 12:07 PM #12Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 54
Why wouldnt you run it?
-
01-15-2005, 12:16 PM #13VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by Big_Lex
Androgens bind the ANDROGEN RECEPTOR and that's it. When the steroid binds it influence the cells to perform a certain action. EQ and Deca would be a good combo.
Thanks for realizing I’m so smart.
-
01-15-2005, 01:15 PM #14Associate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- n.california
- Posts
- 160
i will never do eq again.deca is a great as to use in a cycle.i need it for my joints.bad shoulder from pitching and two back surgerys.
-
01-15-2005, 03:23 PM #15Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 162
no one has ever stacked EQ and Deca in my Gym and i even asked a few local pros that train here they all say its nonsense
-
01-15-2005, 03:28 PM #16Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 304
Deca shuts you down harder I believe, as for Deca and EQ together, I agree with Big, they run together just fine. But for me, I don't really like to run more than 3 injectables at a time, so I ususally pick one or the other.
-
01-15-2005, 03:31 PM #17Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 162
have you ever done it? what did you gain? what did you lose? id love some info
-
01-15-2005, 04:06 PM #18
Not to further the hi jacking but, I stacked deca and eq last cycle and had great results. I went from 200 up to a solid 224 on that one. Yeah they are similar and because of that people are constantly comparing them. They both get it done but the gains are different. Deca gains usualy come with alot of water retention. You look huge during your cycle, but down the road a little you will lose some of that mass because you lose water weight. On the other hand if you suffer from joint pain, deca does alot for that. Equipose is mostly known for promoting leaner gains or "quality" gains the way I've seen people put it. Eq is also known to stimulate appitite which can be a big help to bulking cycles. They are both reliable compounds both offering individual properties exclusive to each compound. Your goals should be clear before you begin your cycle and choose accordingly. Bottom line is for quick noticeable mass,go deca. For quality and leaner gains go eq.
-
01-15-2005, 04:24 PM #19Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 273
Originally Posted by Big_Lex
Originally Posted by Big_Lex
-
01-15-2005, 07:03 PM #20VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by Big_Lex
-
01-15-2005, 07:13 PM #21
bro no offence but i notice that you do this alot. You will post somthing like "total crap" with no explanation at all then when they call you out on what they think is true you go into brainiac mode almost like playing cat and mouse when you know there going to lash out at them after they try to make a point because you know your **** and i know that. How about you explain to people before just saying total crap like you do after
Originally Posted by big k.l.g
-
01-15-2005, 07:22 PM #22Originally Posted by big k.l.g
-
01-15-2005, 07:26 PM #23VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by Jackman
From now on I'll explain myself.
Oh well the good times are over.
-
01-15-2005, 07:36 PM #24Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 272
Personally i've used both. I've used eq for 7 monthes a 600mg and saw very slow gains and I will not use EQ again. If your gonna use Eq do atleast 14 weeks because It really kicks in in week 7-8. I saw better gains with Deca for 12 weeks as far as size Use an anti estrogen to keep the water down. Alot of people on this board swear by EQ, You just have to see what works for you body, everybody is different. I'll swear by test and tren . My point is try both but not at the same time thats the only way you'll see what works for you,as far as keeping gains Either one is the same as long as you use anti estrogens with deca so theirs no water bloat and you use proper pct for both. Deca and anavar was a good stack for me also. I would use it with 250mg/500mg of test
-
01-15-2005, 07:51 PM #25
hehe im glad you did not take that the wrong way because your a great bro with lots of info! SO SHARE IT
Originally Posted by big k.l.g
-
01-16-2005, 05:48 AM #26Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 162
all im saying deca /EQ combo isnt done here one of my good friends owns BioTest rights for SA and they sponsor our top bodybuilders. no offence bro but judging from your picture id rather take someone's advice whos competed many many times. You also havent explained why is it a GOOD combo."They bind to Androgen receptor sites" you say? which ones exactly? shed some light please. How come no site ive come across ever has a Deca/Eq combo as advised cycle?how come layman's quide doesn't recomend it? most of the MDs that i read have never had deca/EQ combo why? even the front page of this site doesnt have it in recommended cycles why?. Please explain im here to gather new info not to verbally fight with you, maybe here in south A we dont know much, explain, thats the way to go right? you said it yourself...
-
01-16-2005, 05:52 AM #27Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 162
Originally Posted by Smart@$$
-
01-16-2005, 06:14 AM #28Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 162
Originally Posted by Smart@$$
-
01-16-2005, 08:11 AM #29Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 273
Originally Posted by Big_Lex
P.S. They do not "fight each other for a receptor" sorry to let you in on that, again do some research by using that search button.
-
01-16-2005, 08:17 AM #30Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 273
Originally Posted by Big_Lex
ATTENTION MODS!
So can someone educate themselves by gathering data, and watching from real world experiences? If this wan't true your mom and dad would have never tried to teach you anything. Learning through experience can be the most painful leasons. bigklg has always stated he has only done one cycle but he hangs out with bodybuilders and has been natty over two years. Stop flaming because something you were told by your freinds may not be the truth.
-
01-16-2005, 08:25 AM #31Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 54
-
01-16-2005, 08:56 AM #32Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 162
Originally Posted by Smart@$$
thanks
-
01-16-2005, 08:57 AM #33VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by Big_Lex
MD? You mean the mag? Cuz most of the steroid writers for that mag don't know ****. Besides William Llewellyn and Jose Antonio.
The front page of this site is OUTDATED. We are working on new drug profiles.
I'm done with you and this argument, keep on believing what you do.
Ok here what to do since you are so offended that i tryed to help you and has resorted to insulting my pic........PM me with your current cycle and train exp and post your pic in the members section if you don't mind.
www.pubmed.com <--------find proof that Boldenone and nandrolone "fights for the same sites" if you do I'll be smart@$$s love slave for a month.Last edited by BajanBastard; 01-16-2005 at 09:02 AM.
-
01-16-2005, 09:02 AM #34Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 162
yet another intelligent reply.
-
01-16-2005, 09:06 AM #35VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by Big_Lex
-
01-16-2005, 09:16 AM #36Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 162
arent you the one who posted "total crap" " you dont know sh!t" etc. etc. arent you the one whos supposed to bring out some info. why you need to insult? what are you 16? didnt jackman say earlier "explain to people". Muscular D has sh!t writers? hehe
i will post my pics i said that a few times in my threads at the end of the cycle and after the PCT but not cause you asked for them.
-
01-16-2005, 09:36 AM #37VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by Big_Lex
I'll try to explain myself AGAIN.
Anabolic steroids bind to the androgen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor to influence muscle cell growth and slow catabolic activity.
There is no testosterone receptor, nandrolone receptor, boldenone receptor.
So how can deca and EQ "fight for the same sites"?
All I'm hearing from you is "this dude said!" and "so and so says" no proof just hearsay.
-
01-16-2005, 09:59 AM #38Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 273
Actually Romano was the first time I ever heard of someone using bold/deca together, and after reading on here and others that actually have tried it say it was good, then I tested it out. Guess what? It works...
-
01-16-2005, 12:02 PM #39
Lex, i suggest you pick up this book:
Non-Reproductive Actions of Sex Steroids Gregory R. Bock 1995
Buy it for $34.30 (Save 78%!!!!!!) at half.com
that's the text for my last semester's endocrinology class. It'll explain why KIG is right and you aren't.
-
01-16-2005, 12:07 PM #40VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by chrisAdams
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Next cycle... Just...
Yesterday, 08:17 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS