Thread: QV Underdoseing???
-
02-01-2005, 07:33 PM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- few steps from hell
- Posts
- 64
QV Underdoseing???
i heard Qv's been underdoseing lately, is that correct?Has anyone tried QV's Test E and Test P lately?If you have tried QV and also tried other brand's, which did you like better?
-
02-01-2005, 07:54 PM #2Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 84
i've used QV for my first and only 2 cycles and so have my buddies and all of us saw great results. i love their prop, cyp and EQ. my buddy has gone from 6 ft 185 to 255 lbs in a little over a year...all with QV products
-
02-01-2005, 08:02 PM #3
-
02-01-2005, 08:35 PM #4Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- few steps from hell
- Posts
- 64
have you heard of Pharma Limited?Ultratest(test p)? I can get this also its a little more $$$ but if its human grade I'll go with that. Does anyone know if they are?
-
02-01-2005, 09:07 PM #5Associate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- n.california
- Posts
- 160
right now im using QV deca and test-e.the test-e 50ml bottle was overdosed about 8ml.im very satisfied at this point in my cycle.tommorrow 4th shot 21days since first shot.started kicking in few days ago.
-
02-01-2005, 09:21 PM #6Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- few steps from hell
- Posts
- 64
overdosed or overfilled???
-
02-02-2005, 12:53 AM #7AnabolicAlien Guest
qv??
i can't believe people even bother using qv gear. it's garbage.
i wouldn't use it even if you gave it to me. it's so underdosed it's worth wasting my time with. the last time i used it big-g sold it to me for a high price and it was totally fake or severely underdosed.
A.A.
-
02-02-2005, 01:00 AM #8Originally Posted by AnabolicAlien
If you are going to bash a product, support your statement. I for one have had nothing but good experiences with Quality Vet.
-
02-02-2005, 01:12 AM #9AnabolicAlien Guest
?
you're joking right? someone needs to prove that qv is underdosed? lmao.
A.A.
-
02-02-2005, 01:22 AM #10Originally Posted by AnabolicAlien
to many people report good things about qv for this statement to be anything other than opinion
now if you had some lab tests done to prove the inferiority of QV products
then i would have no choice but to agree
i personally have had nothing but positive experiances with thier deca300 and stan100. as far as other compounds i can't comment, but i do have a close friend that will attest to the effectiveness of QV products
-
02-02-2005, 01:57 AM #11Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 110
lmao at your a. wtf. ive been hearing a few things from a couple of people lately about qv being a little under dosed. bfd. if it is bold 200 and come in at 198 or test e 250 at 246.8, who could ever tell the differance. im not flaming , but i want the truth. ive got several people and myself that love qv. i cant believe that the results came from bunk gear.im going to start a new cycle in the morning as a matter of fact , and ill keep everyone poster. qv bold, and test e. come on guys, if you dont like something let us all know, we are here to learn and if someone wants to flame a brand b/c they dont like it , or that its underdosed, support your reasons. i like it and ive got 5 bottles and im going to use it all. if nothing happens you will all hear about it. good luck to all. ive got about 5 hours till my cycle starts. im going to bed.
-
02-02-2005, 06:52 AM #12Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- few steps from hell
- Posts
- 64
good luck with the QV. My source I trust 99.9%, the last 4 times I got Qv it all checked out on their website. I wish you the best, good luck.
HW101
-
02-02-2005, 04:03 PM #13
i use qv and like it alot. I've got really good results, but i have never tried human grade...I will try human grade next and see the difference. From what i hear you will never go back to qv, but in another aspect, qv helped me get big along with the proper diet and dedication.
-
02-02-2005, 04:07 PM #14
I have Qv gear, but have not used it yet. Both posted doses (from QV website) show my stuff is overdosed slightly...Enant 250 shows at 252 and Test Cyp 200 shows at 214. I know that these are their own test results so I take it with a grain of salt.
-
02-02-2005, 04:12 PM #15
It might be that they are underdosed....or just good fakes...check the pictures forum....Lots of very hard to spot fake QV stuff floating around. Dont just check your lot numbers because people making fakes can check those just as easy....check the website pictures for quality vet and be very particular to details. This place is a process manufacturer...they are not going to switch label formats for shi*s and giggles on people.
-
02-02-2005, 04:18 PM #16
IMO QV is probably one of the best "VET" grade manufacturers. ALMOST ALL manufactured vet grade gear is gonna be underdosed and/or underfilled. I've seen tons of reports, arguing both sides of the conflict, some of which can be found on this site. Batches differ: Bottom line. If you want gear that you know for certain is not underdosed or underfilled, then make it yourself. Other wise you take the good with the bad in the Vet gear market. Like I said, IMO QV is probably one of the best for it, compared to most of it's competitors.
-
02-02-2005, 04:24 PM #17Originally Posted by justincredible
-
02-03-2005, 02:05 PM #18Originally Posted by justincredible
Well put.
-
02-03-2005, 06:46 PM #19Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Vegas
- Posts
- 549
In my younger days I did 2 painful cycles with QV EQ bought from Vet clinics in Mexico...they both were fake...which sucks when they were 50mg/ml (lots of injections) I have done probably 5 more cycles of test with them and have had clean stuff and some that were so **** dirty I started to sweat an hour after injection and hurt like hell. So as they say you pays yer money and you takes yer chances.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
04-23-2024, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS