Thread: Food intake Vs. Test intake
02-22-2005, 08:44 PM #1
Food intake Vs. Test intake
Bare with me here, I am on some pretty stellar painkillers and this may come across as a really riddiculous question........ But the only dumb question is the question not asked!
Here I go. I had put up a cycle critique post a few days ago. I was proposing 750 mg's test enenthate wk along with my EQ and Tren . One post that sticks out in my mind was a lad was telling me to drop the test to 500 wk b/c I wouldnt be able to eat enough.
Would the difference of 250 mg's wk be that noticable?? Would I really have to adjust my caloric intake??
02-22-2005, 08:45 PM #2
ya you probably will have to eat more!!! but eating is fun right!
02-22-2005, 08:51 PM #3
I love eating. I am a glutton. BUT.......... Question posed here is would the 250 mg's make the difference of me NOT being able to eat enough??
02-22-2005, 08:51 PM #4
02-22-2005, 09:20 PM #5
No... If you DO get hungrier... you will be able to eat more... limited resources or something? Shouldnt make that much of a difference.
02-22-2005, 09:44 PM #6
Ya cheers. I was thinking on that same line too but after the response I got I was confused.
02-22-2005, 09:44 PM #7
But I am going to run it at 500 mg's just to run it out longer.
02-22-2005, 09:47 PM #8
Wow I never heard that one before
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)