is 14 weeks too much for first cycle?

**iwant2bebigdog** · 03-22-2005, 08:42 PM

of 500mg test e and 300mg deca ?

**_Chris_** · 03-22-2005, 08:47 PM

IMO yes. 8-10 weeks max

**macgyver_48** · 03-22-2005, 08:48 PM

i'd stick with just test on the first cycle bro. that way you can figure out how your body reacts to it, whether you're gyno prone, how much anti-e's and AI you need to run. just my opinion.

and ditto on 8-10wks.

**RUballs0514** · 03-22-2005, 08:53 PM

Originally Posted by macgyver_48

i'd stick with just test on the first cycle bro. that way you can figure out how your body reacts to it, whether you're gyno prone, how much anti-e's and AI you need to run. just my opinion.

and ditto on 8-10wks.

he could run a test cycle for 12, i think he'd like that better. but you're right on the 8-10 deca /test stack. i'd actually recommend EQ over deca anyways.

**Monsoon says** · 03-22-2005, 08:56 PM

Yea stick to the straight test, you can run that for 12 weeks. Also check the educational forum.

**Angel of death** · 03-22-2005, 09:12 PM

I'd say 10-12 is better than 8-10

**DrugsrGood** · 03-22-2005, 09:17 PM

I think 10 weeks would be ideal. Also agree with others that you should leave deca out of the picture for now and run straight enanthate . You will still see great results as long as you train right, eat right, and rest. 14 weeks would just be harder to recover from. What are you using pct...?

**JoeySpyda** · 03-22-2005, 09:24 PM

I agree with everyone else I would run the test e alone for 8 to 10 weeks.(**** I wish I was back in your shoes again) I am saying that because I would have run test e for my first cycle for that lenght of time myself. Also make sure you have some ancillaries on hand and PCT in check. After you see the results from this then move on to another compound.

**justin2305** · 03-22-2005, 09:36 PM

Originally Posted by Angel of death

I'd say 10-12 is better than 8-10

ditto

**newbrew** · 03-23-2005, 12:41 AM

I am coming up on my 6th week of Test E. I am going to run it 12 weeks, over my initial thought of 8-10 weeks. I feel I am making a good choice.

**Tags** · 03-23-2005, 12:44 AM

I'd go with 12 weeks...

**1-Cent** · 03-23-2005, 12:45 AM

I'd go 12 weeks, no less, theres absolutely no reason to make your first cycle shorter seeing as if you're going to have negative side effects they're going to appear in the first 4-5 weeks, not 3 months later...