Printable View
I have to admit, I am a little confused. I read that people are not looking to put on much size so they use Tren. I also read that tren is 200 times as androgenic and 300 times as anabolic as test. (Not sure about those numbers but it was some astronomical figures). If this is true would not tren be a better bulk drug. ****, would it not be better all around. I mean sure with any cycle I run test but for a great bulk cyle wouldn't Test and Tren be better than Deca and Test, water weight aside?
has a rating of 500/500 compared to test's 100/100
So what is the answer? Anyone
There was a poll which asked which one was a better bulker; tren or deca. Last time I looked it was like 75% in favor of tren...
3 times more androgenic , not 300.
you can use tren for both,just adjust your diet according to wat you wnt.
No. It's 5x as anabolic and 5x as androgenic. Those numbers are from the J.Vida's book on Androgens. It's the gold standard in the industry.
The number is found by giving male winstar rats the steroid in question and then sacrificing them; the weight of their levator ani (a muscle) is weighed and so is their ventral prostate. Those weights give us the anabolic (weight of the muscle) and androgenic (weight of the prostate) components of those ratios.