long or short cycle advocation
well I have read some of the most controversial threads in this board and the most that have called my attention are the test for every cycle threads and the short cycles are bad! Most hard core lifters and BBs are against short cycles and in favor of test wiht every cycle( agains the mindofrossbelif, who advocated short cycles and no test in some cycles! I like short cycles actually, I am not a professional BB and I will never be but I like lifting and BBing and I like what I get out of short cycles. Against most popular belief they give some good results to some members. even winny or var only cycles give some good results wihtout test to some people and we all have seen or heard this by experience of others. Most of the controversy is giving bad advice to newbiees about short cycling, oral only cycles, no test cycles etc etc etc. What calls my attention is why whenever someone posts cycles that are more than 4 months long with very heavy doses and not mgs but gms used weekly no one seems to think that this is also bad for thair health and no one seems to get on their back and start cotraindication or flaming this mambers. I personally think that every one has the right to choose their own way of cycling developing thier knowlede and understanding of AAS. I am not agains long cycles if thats your choice and u think thats what is right for u all I can do is give my opinion and whether is right or wrong the use of AAS lies within the individual's responsibility.
