AAS effectiveness chart?

Printable View

06-28-2005, 03:52 PM
nathanlgd

AAS effectiveness chart?

I used to check the "effectiveness chart" over on steroid.com but I've stopped using it because from what I've read its pretty inaccurate.
I was just wondering how you more experienced lads would rate Test E and Var (individualy) just by judging on your experience. Of course - using the categorys on steroid.com which are:-
Strength
Weight gain
Fat/water loss
estrogen levels (rather than "anti estrogen")
side effects
keepable gains
use a scale of 0 to 5 as on steroid.com with 5 being higher/better.
Cheers
06-28-2005, 04:22 PM
nathanlgd

bump
06-28-2005, 04:30 PM
Alpha-Male

Quote:

Originally Posted by nathanlgd

I used to check the "effectiveness chart" over on steroid.com but I've stopped using it because from what I've read its pretty inaccurate.
I was just wondering how you more experienced lads would rate Test E and Var (individualy) just by judging on your experience. Of course - using the categorys on steroid.com which are:-
Strength VAR 2 TEST E 4
Weight gain VAR 2 TEST E 5
Fat/water loss VAR 4 TEST E 3
estrogen levels (rather than "anti estrogen") NOT SURE ABOUT THIS
side effects VAR 1 TEST E 3
keepable gains VAR 5 TEST E 3
use a scale of 0 to 5 as on steroid.com with 5 being higher/better.
Cheers

In caps, IMO
06-28-2005, 11:44 PM
nathanlgd

Nice one, so those are kind of the values I was expecting from the things I've read. Be nice to hear from one or two more just to double check.
The estrogen category I wanted to be changed from "anti estrogen" which would only apply to clomid and nolva etc (anti e's) to "aromatizing" and hoe badly a compound will aromatize if you know what I mean. So for example, Var would be either a 1 or a 0 because it doesn't aromatize and something that aromatized massively would be a 5.
Ta
06-28-2005, 11:47 PM
madflabby

Good to hear it. Their chart makes it seem like you'll lose everything after doing a test cycle.
06-29-2005, 12:07 AM
nathanlgd

Yeah - 1 star?! what the hells that all about.
06-29-2005, 08:36 AM
nathanlgd

bump anyone?
06-29-2005, 08:55 AM
Gaucho77

Yeah I am with you on those being a bit skewed... only thing I can think of is that those numbers are rationalized without a proper pct included?? :scratch:
06-29-2005, 10:43 AM
nathanlgd

Yeah - maybe, that would make more sense.
06-30-2005, 02:45 AM
nathanlgd

hm, maybe the title of this scared everyone off?
07-01-2005, 06:55 AM
nathanlgd

Ok one last bump and if anyone wants to have ago at T-bol that would be great :)