Printable View
im doing my 5th cycle since 2002. i was wondering if anyone out there that has cycling under their belts- lets say atleast 3 cycles or more, was able to have kids after they started juicing? i want more kids, im only 27. im not exactly sure if this is true or if it just depends on the duration of the cycles and certain roids are worse than others. i have used teste, EQ, dbol and winny tabs. any thoughts?thanks
There are more then one out there I know of a couple off hand, one of them was on a cycle when his wife got pregnant
JohnnyB
so is it factual that roids can decrease fertility?
AAS will decrease sperm production but not 100%. You would need a very long heavy cycle...and even then!
on that show "30 days" a guy was on a real low test dosage with some gh and within something like two and a half weeks all his swimmers were dead in the sample, granted the numbers returned to normal after he discontinued use.Quote:
Originally Posted by righton
i don't know if i made that clear... ALL his guys were dead, not even one swimmin around.
You can't go offhand from somebody else's experiences when it comes to something like this bro. One thing that we all learn very fast as bodybuilders is that everybody is different and we all react unique to every situation.
You have to prioritize what's important in your life. The risk of being infertile while juicing, or waiting and training naturally until you have a few kids.
Can we get Hooker in on this?
good point, everybody is different, just because he went blank super fast does not mean everyone will.Quote:
Originally Posted by RoNNy THe BuLL
Schwarzenegger has 4 kids, end of story.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!:lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by stayinstacked
lol arnold has done it all
bump on this oldie
Stop bumping old thread. This is the second.Quote:
Originally Posted by tallyjuice
Relax, man.Quote:
Originally Posted by Swifto
I can see why your post count is so high, what with you trying to enforce every rule you want. However, I have never seen in the rules where you can't bump anything that is old. Don't read it if you don't like it, but I don't see MOD next to your name.
Try adding good advice rather than cussing and bossing around others. It does not do any good anyway.
Do you think bumping old threads is going to get responses from the memebers that posted in it? As I dont. Many have left and no longer post. More responses will be obtained by starting a new thread with the question in hand. Surely this is commen sense. Another thread was bumped that was 2 years old. If you'de be kind enough to view it, I did offer advice. This is the second thread thats been bumped by the same memeber:Quote:
Originally Posted by Stackertoo
http://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-steroids-questions-answers/160857-what-causes-testicular-atrophy-sperm-reduction-assignment.html
Please elaborte the bolds.
I have never seen in the rules where you can't bump anything that is old.This is an elaboration on the bolds, and was in my original statement.
I don't diagree that a new post will generate more responses. I never said it would not. I don't run around bumping old crap either, but I don't really mind if someone else does, regardless of whether I care what it has to say.
I guess that is what I meant.
I'm not saying you do, but it seems fairly obvious that its being done as their are 2 exmples. The member also hasnt posted again, making me think that they dont reall care about the thread and its responses. So you were posting to state you didnt care about old threads being bumped?!Quote:
Originally Posted by Stackertoo
This is pathetic. I'm going to bed. :wg:
I agree this is pathetic. Enjoy your rest time...Quote:
Originally Posted by Swifto
End of :0piss: match