Printable View
My dealer can get me 1 amp of sust for a little over $10.
He can give me some primo for the same price ($ 10 per amp). These are very good prices on the norwegian marked.
The question is: is an amp of primo (100 mg) worth as much as an amp of sust (250 mg).
I need a roid that`ll leave my system pretty quick (within a month) and I haven`t got the time for sust or testo enthante.
good price for primo I think.
Yeah, I looked up the profile for primo and saw that it usually costs more than that in the US and Norway has a way smaller market thus higher prices.Quote:
Originally Posted by themetalmich
Still, will 200 mg of primo be twice as effective as 250 mg of sust? Is the price worth it compared to the effects?
i doubt primo will be out of your system in a month too!
200mg of primo will do very little. You need at least double that a week for even mild gains.
primo is not worth the money unless your bodyfat is already low, you will see very little from it
I disagree with this particular statement. Everyone says primo is not worth the money... true compared to other compounds and prices. But primo is an anabolic steroid so to say you will see little from it unless your bf is low, you could say the same about any steroid then.Quote:
Originally Posted by stayinstacked
I ran 800mg per week for 6 weeks and that was on top of 500mg of test; some great gains new motivation and hardness you could see through the layer of fat I carry. So you can see alot but you have to use alot and it is expensive...
How will the gains of 200 mg primo a week be compared to 200 mg of sust? Looking at the effectiveness chart its only one star seperating them (primo:3, sust:4) I believe.
:no:Quote:
Originally Posted by Power Viking
200 mgs of primo per wk will provide basically diddlely squat. (400-600 mgs per wk for moderate gains). same for 200 mgs of sust per wk, gains would be jack sh!t.
sust and primo form a nice stack if dosed properly i..e.
75 mgs sust ed
400 mgs primo per wk (minimum)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRICK
But I just finished an 8 week cycle using nothing but 200 mg sust a week,
My bench went up 33 lbs, my deadlift went up about 25lbs and my raw squat went up 33 lbs.
Can I expect similar "diddely squat" with 200 mg primo a week then :scratch:
actually you can probably expect less than that. Sust is still test and is highly anabolic and androgenic, whereas primo is much less anabolic and androgenic so you would get less. BTW, since you just got off a cycle did you do PCT? Are you going to wait the appropriate amount of time before starting again?
I did PCT and kept absolutely everything I gained :7up:Quote:
Originally Posted by longhorn814
Its been a over two months since I went off. Thinking about starting again in a couple of weeks. That`ll make it about 3 months since I got off my last cycle.
Talking from experiance Primo is weak, i would atleast take 800mg of it and at that you wont see much. Id much rather used sust.
Primo is weak... It is more a stacking compound... I also have experience with it and I had a second wind of gains from week 13-18 on my cycle... Mg for Mg test will be better, but if he used 500mg of test and at least 500mg of primo his gains would improve with little or no additional sides.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cordoba
Edit: You could just go with EQ with test. Eq is the poor mans primo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
your atavar floors me! Where the heck did you find it?
is that police academy or chris tucker?Quote:
Originally Posted by znak
Narkissos had Vette put it up... I owe him. Anyhow I do believe it is from the chappelles show and it is charlie murphy.
It's hilarious and if i were high i would be unable to quit staring, remarkable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
Primo is worth whatever you are willing to pay for it. If you are willing to pay $10/amp for it then that is what it is worth to you. If nobody will sell at that price, then you won't buy. Supply and demand set the price. The value is what it is worth to you.
Primo is a great chick drug. Myself, I would not spend my money on it. It is scarce in my circles and would be very expensive if it were available. But I would not hesitate to recommend it to a chick due to the very mild sides and low virilization with moderate doses. YMMV of course.
--
NO PMs for SOURCES!
NO PMs for questions that should be asked on the board!
NO "Thank You" PMs, please.
PMs are for personal or sensitive questions or information, or for stuff that is not allowed to be posted on the board.
Inappropriate PMs will not be read or acknowledged. Repeat offenders will be reported.
-The Baron-
i won't get into a pissin contest regarding 200 mgs of sust, suffice it to say depending on your age 200 mgs per wk of sust may not even replace the test your body produces on its own. to add 33 lbs on your bench is quite remarkable with less than a full amp a wk of sust 250. you're either very young and are still progressing naturally, or indeed as your profile states 89 yrs old.Quote:
Originally Posted by Power Viking
whatever the case based on my own experience with 200mgs pr wk of primo, i wouldn't go less than 400 mgs per wk if i used it again at all (based on cost). my personal opinion remains unchanged; 200 mgs of primo per wk would produce approximately "diddlely squat". anyone else who has cycled primo care to chime in?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Power Viking
test prop and var.
Drummerboy
-----------
My supplier hasn`t got prop or var (but for some odd reason he has estandron *sigh*).
Trick
----
My goal is to bench 500 by the time I`m 100 years old :)
No, I`m in my early to mid 20s and haven`t done much roids.
Did two cycles of 1 amp every 10 days for 8 weeks. Both times I got the aformentioned results (but the two cycles were many years apart actually).
I think I`m just gonna cancel that order of primo and go with some sust or enthante after all. Thanks for all the replies, guys
I dug up some info, studies show mg per mg primo is only 88% anabolic as testosterone and 44%-57% as androgenic. Sust will yeild more bang per buck, real world results I think primo is even weaker probably because its less of a androgen? Basically its a girls drug. The only thing I would concider using it again for would be cutting, but id still rather use test, tren, winny for that.
Are you a tested athlete?