Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    SouthSideBeast is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005

    juast a question

    wat do u all think a bout kids taken roids iz it bad lik around the age of 16 to 18 iz it 2 young and wat are some negatives bout it.Thanx

  2. #2
    abstrack's Avatar
    abstrack is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Geezus man, If you cant even spell then you should not even be thinking of a cycle. LOL just kidding!

    16-18 is too young IMO, You have your own natural test levels that can do just as much at that age. At age 16-18 you should be learning how to properly diet and train.

  3. #3
    dive_kid's Avatar
    dive_kid is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Canada Ehh...
    I totaly agree with abstract. there is no need for roids at 16-18.
    you asked about some of the negatives, one of the biggest concerns
    is closeing growth plates before you are fully developed.
    but the list is long

  4. #4
    bigbouncinballs's Avatar
    bigbouncinballs is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Your mom's
    reading that was like deciphering hieroglyphics! i would assume a large risk factor would be that many younger kids are not too concerned about thier health. how many 16 year-olds do you know that get thier bloodwork done between cycles?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts