Does anyone really know this answer????
Many times I have seen the same question on the boards. That question being does anti-estrogens "HINDER" muscular gains.
Some say "NO" while others say "YES"
L.Rea claims one should not take anti-es until day 15 in his book "building the perfect beast" as one should let estrogen run rampant for the first two weeks to allow for an increase in androgen receptors but one study showed estrogen had no affect on androgen receptors..See what I mean???? :scratch:
Obviously the extra water retention will make one look fuller and give added strength, but do anti-estrogens hinder muscle gains on a cell level?????Estrogens have been touted as having the ability to increass androgen receptor sensitivity,increase igf/gh release and add glycogen to the muscles.
Yes I know some get high blood pressure,fat deposits,gyno and edema from having excess estrogens, but I also know of some bodybuilders who have never touched any anti-es and have not had any issues. These same guys claim their gains are better with higher estrogen levels but I also worry about the long term health of these individulas if estrogen are elevated for prolonged periods. Then you have guys like Arnold(arguably the best body builder in the world) who had never heard of anti-es during his peak..Hmm.. :scratch:
I feel no one really knows if anti-es hinder muscle gains at this point because not enough studies have been done. For example; one study done by the endocrinal metab in 1985 said taking 1 mg of arimidex decreased estrogen by 50% while increasing testosterone levels 58%. However they also said only .05 mls of arimidex still decreased estrogen levels by 50% but caused "ZERO" increase in testosterone levels. :scratch:
Folks this makes no sense to me????????? Does anyone really know?? It makes one wonder doesn't it????? :scratch: