Results 1 to 12 of 12
Thread: Test E and C
-
10-02-2005, 01:41 AM #1
Test E and C
I have always used test e, but have never tried test C. I know they are pretty similar, but can anyone tell me if one really is better than the other?
-
10-02-2005, 01:48 AM #2AR-Elite Hall of Famer
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 10,525
- Blog Entries
- 1
personal preference really. Ever since scribed to cyp, it has been my test of choice.
-
10-02-2005, 02:09 AM #3
Cool. Is it possible that one may have a better reaction to test c over test e or vice versa?
-
10-02-2005, 02:11 AM #4AR-Elite Hall of Famer
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 10,525
- Blog Entries
- 1
Originally Posted by ryan9101
-
10-02-2005, 02:26 AM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 1,717
Well, looking at it for the pure efficiency of it... seems Enanthate would be better in my opinion... as it will be more mg of test per cc... plus, I often see it advertised at 200mg per ml, so if you're getting charged roughly the same per 10ml vial, well, the enanthates going to have another half gram of test in it. Bang for the buck.
-
10-02-2005, 02:32 AM #6AR-Elite Hall of Famer
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 10,525
- Blog Entries
- 1
again, ill be honest (hell, it is about 4AM here) as my research in these fields has been lacking for awhile now. I just look at it this way, how often do you see hrt doctors in America prescribe enth? They write scripts for cyp.
Dont get me wrong, i have nothing against enth as i used it many a times back in the day
-
10-02-2005, 03:21 AM #7Originally Posted by 956Vette
-
10-02-2005, 03:29 AM #8Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 1,717
Exactly what I was thinking. They are CERTAIN that the more shots they have to perscribe someone, the more likely they are to drop out of the protocol. Thus - more shots = less clients, and concommitantly ... less $$, and $$ was the exact thing that motivated my suggestion of 2.5 grams per vial of a higher efficacy drug in the first place. :-)
I have my motives.
-
10-02-2005, 02:23 PM #9Originally Posted by TrumanHW
-
10-02-2005, 07:55 PM #10Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 1,717
Yeah, and also counterfitted in regards to our views of it here... at least if you're trying to get pharm gear, as opposed to UGL.
-
10-02-2005, 08:05 PM #11
Ok so I guess I should stick with ethanate? I saw someone had posted the exact strength of each ester per mg does anyone have that?
-
10-02-2005, 09:33 PM #12
i was a test e user then my supply of test e dried up... i switched to test c. my bacne was cut in half... coincidence????? i don't know. 3 weeks on test c and bacne is better than it ever was... i must admit. my test e was amps (Galenika YU ) i think they cld have been underdosed. my test c is bd... bd has been nothing but quality gear. so maybe it was a blood level issue???
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
cutting/ fat loss advice needed...
04-16-2024, 01:34 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS