Would you take a myostatin blocker??

**peump** · 10-05-2005, 06:16 PM

Seriously. When are we to big? Are some of us already to big? Have any of us ever been to big?

We talk alot about being safe and healthy. (blood test, pct, proper off time)

It seems that myostatin blockers will eventually hit the gyms.

would you take it?

**Pinnacle** · 10-05-2005, 06:20 PM

Simply put...YES

~Pinnacle~

**Smak** · 10-05-2005, 06:22 PM

I bought 2 bottle of Myostat by Biotest when it first came out like four years ago. Let's just say I became so big I stopped taking it and now resort to steroids .

**Pinnacle** · 10-05-2005, 06:25 PM

Originally Posted by Smak

I bought 2 bottle of Myostat by Biotest when it first came out like four years ago. Let's just say I became so big I stopped taking it and now resort to steroids.

Maybe you quite don't understand.Scientist are,as we speak,working on a drug to block the gene.It's in the early stages of testing right now.

~Pinnacle~

**Smak** · 10-05-2005, 06:30 PM

Originally Posted by Pinnacle

Maybe you quite don't understand.Scientist are,as we speak,working on a drug to block the gene.It's in the early stages of testing right now.

~Pinnacle~

This is what I took Pinnacle. I became the Incredible Hulk. Please stay away from it!

http://www.keysupplements.com/products/678.htm

**Smak** · 10-05-2005, 06:31 PM

Just playing. It was worthless. Money out of my pocket, but I believed in it!

**peump** · 10-05-2005, 06:33 PM

Originally Posted by Pinnacle

Simply put...YES

~Pinnacle~

freak

**Pinnacle** · 10-05-2005, 06:34 PM

Originally Posted by Smak

This is what I took Pinnacle. I became the Incredible Hulk. Please stay away from it!

http://www.keysupplements.com/products/678.htm

Once again..I know all too well what garbage is out there suppliment wise....that suppliment has nothing to do with real life scientic experiments that are being conducted.

~Pinnacle~

**majorpecs** · 10-05-2005, 08:27 PM

Sign me up as soon as the underground market has it in stock!

**topvega** · 10-05-2005, 08:34 PM

Originally Posted by Pinnacle

Simply put...YES

~Pinnacle~

DITTO

as long as it only blocks it and doesn't turn it off...

**Seattle Junk** · 10-05-2005, 08:38 PM

I took the blocker....You drink it like Winny...

**IBdmfkr** · 10-05-2005, 08:42 PM

There are gonna be Freaks everywhere! It will be truely amazing.

**magicstick2003** · 10-05-2005, 09:00 PM

i would take it if it were controllable. If it flat out turned off the gene then no. if it just blocked and only to some extent i would try it. I also guess it would depend on how long it last for and if you could somewhat limit it so it didt get out of control.

**BigRandy** · 10-05-2005, 09:02 PM

id take it if the gains>sides

**peump** · 10-06-2005, 05:49 PM

Originally Posted by magicstick2003

i would take it if it were controllable. If it flat out turned off the gene then no. if it just blocked and only to some extent i would try it. I also guess it would depend on how long it last for and if you could somewhat limit it so it didt get out of control.

^^^^^^^^^
I agree with this.

They (Wyeth-Ayerst) are recruiting people with MD right now,

to test a compound called MYO-29

so there should be more info soon

**spywizard** · 10-06-2005, 05:58 PM

i'm on the waiting list

**peump** · 10-06-2005, 06:34 PM

http://www.pnas.org/content/vol98/is...512700002.jpeg

some of you may have already seen this jacked mouse.
if you have not, then check it out

**beast N°1** · 12-23-2005, 01:31 PM

someone i know said he can get is hands on this kind a stuff soon for a reasonable price.
but is that possible so soon? i tought he was lying his ass out because it seems to good to be true
he sais it comes in injectable form, injected once weekly.

**rodge** · 12-23-2005, 02:03 PM

i would'nt touch it but i also said that:

1 never going above 1000mg of steroids
2 never using growth
3 never to use thyroid hormones
4 not gonna take insulin

so when its there we shall see how things turn out. i feel as i could never be to big.

-rodge

**Booz** · 12-23-2005, 02:06 PM

in an instant!!!

**MASTER** · 12-23-2005, 02:07 PM

it would depends on whether it would disfigure me, eg with facial muscles and other small support muscls becoming huge, dont want ne of that!!

**notanormalgent** · 12-23-2005, 02:20 PM

I don't see why it wouldn't disfigure you. Also, what about muscles like the heart and tongue? We use them constantly, without the regulation of myostatin they'd surely grow.

**fred9** · 12-23-2005, 05:01 PM

check out the head of the mouse...twice as big as normal

**I_Want_Abs** · 12-23-2005, 05:13 PM

that mouse is a ****en monster
does it give you a time frame of how long it took the mouse to develope muscle mass like that

**Rolsroyce** · 12-23-2005, 08:25 PM

oh yeah baby...Sign me up...

**alwayson** · 12-23-2005, 09:14 PM

I think it won't be much better than the GH/slin combo...except that it will be safer and you won't get a gut

**goose** · 12-23-2005, 09:24 PM

Originally Posted by booz

in an instant!!!

You nutter,lets do this Booz...will cost us 1500quid for a cycle.We wiil do this when England play`s in the world cup and win,by the time its over,we will be as big as Ronnie,then hit the stellas, PM me lets do this.lol.

goose4............

**Bigpup101** · 12-23-2005, 09:56 PM

it5's priceless imo i wouldnt have to think twice, id sell my v=car if i could block that gene

**omnipotent** · 12-23-2005, 10:30 PM

i heard its out but its expensive as **** .. couple of g's or so .. from what i understand it should be better then gh if used properly for muscle growth . if it permenantly blocks the gene.. thats bad news.. if it does it for a certain amount of time tht would be kickass

**notanormalgent** · 12-23-2005, 10:43 PM

Assuming it does not permanently block the myostatin gene, does anyone know if you actually keep the gains? Or once the myostatin gene is active again, will it regulate the muscle and shrink back to normal capacity?

**Milky87** · 12-24-2005, 04:57 AM

if its temporary inhibition: you bet your candy-loving arse i would

If its permanent: I highly doubt it but there is a very slight possibility

**vitor** · 12-24-2005, 05:26 AM

If it wouldnt mess up my "pretty face" I would take it, without a doubt!

***BajanBastard*** · 12-24-2005, 08:16 AM

Personally I’m more interested in IL-15. Yeah i would use it but not without knowing about the adverse side effects, if any.

**goose** · 12-24-2005, 11:14 AM

Originally Posted by big k.l.g

Personally I’m more interested in IL-15. Yeah i would use it but not without knowing about the adverse side effects, if any.

I have information from a very reliable source,who knows a few people who have tried this,the results have been poor,nothing.Just because it works for animals does not mean it works for humans,we must consider this.I was going to run IL-15 in 06,but not now.

goose4...

***BajanBastard*** · 12-24-2005, 12:05 PM

Originally Posted by goose4

I have information from a very reliable source,who knows a few people who have tried this,the results have been poor,nothing.Just because it works for animals does not mean it works for humans,we must consider this.I was going to run IL-15 in 06,but not now.

goose4...

Was it real? IL-15 is best used with IGF-1. Ummm 1/10 ratio i think. If anything it should have produced some degree of fat loss. Gimme a sec.

***BajanBastard*** · 12-24-2005, 12:18 PM

I think who ever it was got scammed. IL-15 has a lot of solid research as an anabolic , mainly anti-catabolic hormone. It also worked with human cells in vitro.

**Pinnacle** · 12-24-2005, 12:23 PM

Originally Posted by big k.l.g

I think who ever it was got scammed. IL-15 has a lot of solid research as an anabolic, mainly anti-catabolic hormone. It also worked with human cells in vitro.

It's said to not bond to the proteins in humans.As we all know,just because a drug works for animals,doesn't mean it works in humans.Cells (research cultures)don't have organs ect...not a plausible argument for this by any means.

There are BBers trying this stuff out right now and not getting results.fake?I highly doubt that.

***BajanBastard*** · 12-24-2005, 12:38 PM

Originally Posted by Pinnacle

It's said to not bond to the proteins in humans.As we all know,just because a drug works for animals,doesn't mean it works in humans.Cells (research cultures)don't have organs ect...not a plausible argument for this by any means.

There are BBers trying this stuff out right now and not getting results.fake?I highly doubt that.

This is what I’m not getting. What proteins does it bind to? Not receptor sites? Is it a species specific hormone like GH? I just don't understand why it doesn't work.

Remeber when GH was a 'scam' because people were buying horse and cow GH?

**powerliftmike** · 12-24-2005, 12:54 PM

Originally Posted by Pinnacle

Once again..I know all too well what garbage is out there suppliment wise....that suppliment has nothing to do with real life scientic experiments that are being conducted.

~Pinnacle~

Yes, we are talking about some inhibitor drug to stop myostatin gene expression, not some worthless kelp from the ocean thought to reduce myostatin activity sold as a supplement.

***BajanBastard*** · 12-24-2005, 01:13 PM

Originally Posted by powerliftmike

Yes, we are talking about some inhibitor drug to stop myostatin gene expression, not some worthless kelp from the ocean thought to reduce myostatin activity sold as a supplement.

Man! Do you remember the ads? "Get our myo-stopper 5000 and change your genetics!!" God i hate the supp industry.