Thread: D-bol or Halotestin??
-
10-17-2005, 08:02 PM #1
D-bol or Halotestin??
Which one is more toxic??
Either Dbol @50mg or Halo@ 40mg??
-
10-17-2005, 08:06 PM #2Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 75
Id say halo...although you would be hard pressed to find actual scientific info to back a claim that either one is more toxic, most would agree that halo is more toxic. It not only is 17-aa, but also has a 9 flourine group attached to it, which I think is what causes it to be known as a very liver toxic roid.
-
10-17-2005, 08:32 PM #3Originally Posted by Heavy
agreed
-
10-17-2005, 09:04 PM #4
good post heavy... now... the ? that depends on your goal, dbol will bloat you... halo wont... dbol will render some new muscle... not much really, but some...halo wont.. halo is pure strength.. and more than dbol... but you will not have anything to show for it really based on it alone.. so u pic
-
10-18-2005, 02:09 AM #5Originally Posted by Heavy
-
10-18-2005, 06:10 AM #6
Thanks for the info..
-
10-18-2005, 04:57 PM #7Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- njva
- Posts
- 662
Do a search theres lots of human studies with halo. If im not mistakin its used on males who enter puberty very late they give them a certain dose to help puberty kick in.
-
10-18-2005, 05:14 PM #8
dbol at 50mgs is def toxic to your liver. halo at 40mgs is also. read hookers' profile on the two. halo is the shit from what i hear. awesome strength and vascularity. i'd much rather run halo at the end of a cycle though. dbol is good for mass, halo for strength and hardness......fighters swear by this stuff, good aggression too.
-
10-18-2005, 06:34 PM #9Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 75
Originally Posted by groundandpoundpwr21
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
Yesterday, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS