Thread: short or long cycle
11-01-2005, 06:33 PM #1
short or long cycle
what do u guys think of a long cycle vs a short cycle... i was thinking about doin short cycles for a couple months instead of one big long cycle usually a 12 weeker... im curious if ne one here has tried short cycles and what ur gains or suggestions r.... ne info is good info
11-01-2005, 06:38 PM #2Originally Posted by GHO5T
11-01-2005, 07:01 PM #3
11-01-2005, 08:20 PM #4
11-01-2005, 08:27 PM #5
Are you talking about those short SHORT cycles that were being discussed on here? Like 4 weeks long.
11-01-2005, 08:33 PM #6
yea i read that article... had some good points, it got me thinkin a little, and i might experiment with it... but i dunno i dont want to jump into it without knowing what excatly should b done, ne ways if ne of u guys have tried ne thing like this share with us... ne info is good info
11-01-2005, 08:35 PM #7
personally, i'd never consider anything shorter than 8-10 weeks, and that's with SHORT esters such as test prop. For longer estered gear (test E/C, etc) i'd stick to 12-14 weeks.
i don't believe in the short 4wk cycles. it was a well enough written article that made some good points, but there were some jumps in logic. don't think it stands up in the real world.
11-01-2005, 08:43 PM #8
maybe ill try one of those short cycles in the future after ive done more hardcore research on it but for now... long cycles it is
11-01-2005, 08:47 PM #9
I ran long cycles in the past and I believe that shorter cycle 16wk or less is best. Unless your changing compounds or upping you calories its totally useless. My next cycle will be test prop, tren , var, and winny.
11-01-2005, 08:51 PM #10
11-01-2005, 09:06 PM #11
what r ur dosages for those...
11-01-2005, 09:23 PM #12Originally Posted by GHO5T
11-01-2005, 09:29 PM #13
good luck to u bro
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)