Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    ZIA1's Avatar
    ZIA1 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4

    EQ Quote...you buy into this?

    I read an article that stated "the best results with boldenone are seen when a user front-loads. Usually that means he will use a high doses of 600-800 mg/week for 2 weeks and then lower that dose to the normal 300-400 mg/week for the remaining 8-10 weeks."

    Anyone heard of front-loading EQ? I've read a lot on EQ but this was the 1st time that I have seen this stated. What do you think?

  2. #2
    powerliftmike's Avatar
    powerliftmike is offline ~Elite AR-Hall of Famer~
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    gates of hell
    Posts
    5,712
    Quote Originally Posted by AIZ
    I read an article that stated "the best results with boldenone are seen when a user front-loads. Usually that means he will use a high doses of 600-800 mg/week for 2 weeks and then lower that dose to the normal 300-400 mg/week for the remaining 8-10 weeks."

    Anyone heard of front-loading EQ? I've read a lot on EQ but this was the 1st time that I have seen this stated. What do you think?
    That is bad advice. I wouldn't do that.

  3. #3
    ZIA1's Avatar
    ZIA1 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4
    The only reason that I can agree with you that it is bad advice is b/c it's the only essay I've read so far that supports this method. Why do you say its a bad idea?

  4. #4
    powerliftmike's Avatar
    powerliftmike is offline ~Elite AR-Hall of Famer~
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    gates of hell
    Posts
    5,712
    Quote Originally Posted by AIZ
    The only reason that I can agree with you that it is bad advice is b/c it's the only essay I've read so far that supports this method. Why do you say its a bad idea?
    Long acting AASs shouldn't be frontloaded. If you want to run EQ and have a kickstart add in susp, prop, drol, or dbol .

  5. #5
    Smiley619's Avatar
    Smiley619 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    883
    why shouldnt they be front loaded??

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    541
    powerMike,

    i'm gonna cycle suspension for 8 wks. you think i can front load that with dbol ? Even though its a no ester test haha. curious as to what effect this would have. Cuz i'm thinking about adding winnie or dbol to this cycle. but not sure how to time and plan it all out

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    541
    smiley,
    they shouldnt be frontloaded because it takes forever for their half life. Thus if you frontloaded say test e with a 7 day half life i think. the high levels would stay in you longer than desired and prolly would give enough time for gyno and bad sides to show up. thats my opinion as to what could happen.

  8. #8
    abstrack's Avatar
    abstrack is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    7,358
    The theory with frontloading is that you will have a more consistent or higher levver of EQ running in your system when it finally kicks in per say. In my own personal experince I find it a waste of gear and tend to run EQ at a consistent doseage for alonger period of time. Other people enjoy frontloading long esters and live by it in every cycle.

    If you are just looking to get the gear into your system so you lifting heavier or "feeling it" then you should just jump start the cycle with an oral or a short acting ester such as prop or tren
    abstrack@protonmail.com

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •