Results 1 to 13 of 13
Thread: longer cycle or high dosage
-
11-14-2005, 08:19 PM #1Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- in your beezy's vagina
- Posts
- 295
longer cycle or high dosage
in the hopes of trying to avoid androgenic side effects, mostly acne, what do you think would be more effective of the two options
test c and eq for 13 weeks at 400 and 480 respectively
or
test c and eq for 17 weeks at 300 and 360 respectively
do you think my results will be drastically different with the second approach?
my last cycle was test p at 350 and deca at 250 for 12 weeks and i did not have too bad of an acne situation, this time i am better prepared, since i have not gotten acne in a couple years it was totally unexpected in last cycle
preparation i believe is key but also which of the two choices do you think is the most logical for my situation?
-
11-15-2005, 08:38 AM #2
i think u can do test c & eq for 15 weeks @ 400 & 480 mg that`s the best idea i think as the eq is very slow acting as the test c
-
11-15-2005, 09:49 AM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 1,727
I recommend the low dosage myself, because i try to avoid all of the side effects at all posibilities. If you plan on competing then, go with the higher dosage. The lower the Dosage the less sides.
-
11-15-2005, 10:12 AM #4
I think it would really be a toss up for total gains made, but IMO I would go with the higher doses for 14 wks on Test and 13 wks on the EQ. This IMO is due to the fact that both will shut down the HTPA, and the shorter period of time it is supressed the easier it is to get back online.
-
11-15-2005, 10:15 AM #5
eq should at least be run for 12 weeks... and i hope you are going to run your test longer then eq and at a higher dosage.... you may have said it but im not sure which dosages are for what??
-
11-15-2005, 12:20 PM #6Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- in your beezy's vagina
- Posts
- 295
Originally Posted by carmine09
Id like to thank SHORTIE for his response very logical i think that was all i needed to hear thank you pal
-
11-15-2005, 01:30 PM #7Originally Posted by leansauce
-
11-15-2005, 02:50 PM #8Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- in your beezy's vagina
- Posts
- 295
Originally Posted by carmine09
-
11-15-2005, 03:00 PM #9
watever goodies you have mate test cyp should be ran for 1 week longer than the eq,then ya got 18 days from the last cyp inject to start pct,,this is done like this so everythin will be lined up and outa your system to start the pct,if your not goin this way enlighten us with wat your goin to do?
-
11-15-2005, 03:01 PM #10
Well, I hope this answers it for ya lean-IMO 400 mg/wk test is nowhere near high a dose. I think that the range you are talking about should be pretty limited in sides. I personally don't get sides at any test under 750 mg/ wk, but that's what works for me, but IMO 400 will do you good. And running prop after the cyp up to pct is a good way to go IMO.
-
11-15-2005, 08:10 PM #11Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- in your beezy's vagina
- Posts
- 295
Originally Posted by booz
yes thank u shortie your input made me decide to up my test dose 50mg from the last cycle to 400 instead of subtracting 50mg i really dont think either way will make a whole lot of difference in sides and the end result gains and the shorter the cycle the easier it is for your body to get back to normal where as lower dosage still shuts u down same amount not making it any easier
all signs point to 400mg a week i will be starting in two weeks and i cant wait
-
11-16-2005, 11:55 AM #12Originally Posted by leansauce
-
11-16-2005, 12:49 PM #13Originally Posted by leansauce
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
cutting/ fat loss advice needed...
04-16-2024, 01:34 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS