Thread: good chart for the new.......
-
11-28-2005, 08:56 PM #1Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
good chart for the new.......
Gives you an idea on ASS,check out Primo the only anabolic ,that has the perfect score for Ability To Keep Gains.This chart will show you many things,Anadrol has the worst mark for keeping gains.Winstrol is near perfect.
Winstrol is a very potent tissue-building drug in the truest sense! As far as effectiveness in building muscle, 50 mg of Winny tabs will blow 50 mg of Anadrol right out of the water! Anadrol is quite weak in this sence.
It's so obvious. Anadrol is designed to correct anemia. It builds red blood cells. It does not build muscle. It may help at the end of a course to "fill up" on blood, which may help you to hold on to the gained weight. It's a poor man's EPO [erythropoietin]. If I wanted to make a lot of money, I'd design a drug and call it Super-bol 5,000,000! Everyone will think it's really strong!
http://www.steroid.com/effect.php
goose4................Last edited by goose; 11-29-2005 at 10:08 AM.
-
11-28-2005, 09:08 PM #2Originally Posted by goose4
-
11-28-2005, 09:13 PM #3
ay! wait your turn!
-
11-28-2005, 09:28 PM #4
never heard of test thermaxen...got better ratings then all other test
-
11-28-2005, 09:29 PM #5
Follow up,
I read that suspension has a crappy likely hood of keeping the gains. How can I avoid gain lose/ keep the gains for this AAS?
-
11-28-2005, 09:31 PM #6
Anadrol does build muscle, it just puts a lot of fat too, plus you really can't hold on to the gains you put on. Just bare with me for a minute...
If your bench goes up 50lbs. in 2-3 weeks from 50mg of anadrol a day, I'm sure you're putting on muscle, how can 8-10lbs. of water add that much? But you loose it all anyways, so for this reason, I will never take drol.
-
11-28-2005, 09:40 PM #7
I see you used some direct quotes from Paul Borresen in your post.I take it you're a believer in what he used to say?
~Pinnacle~
-
11-28-2005, 09:44 PM #8
i didnt see tren !
-
11-28-2005, 09:57 PM #9Originally Posted by edmen2
Finaplix .....
-
11-28-2005, 09:59 PM #10Originally Posted by topvega
-
11-28-2005, 10:08 PM #11
-
11-28-2005, 10:14 PM #12
These charts usually suck ass......
-
11-28-2005, 10:27 PM #13Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 2,060
I saw this chart a couple of years ago. I think it's misleading and perhaps it might have some influence on why we get so many posts about cycles that are poorly laid out. Winny only cycles, var only cycles and what not.
It lists Parabolan as a 4 and Insulin as a 3 rating in regards to fat burning. I'm sorry to say that tren /parabolan doesn't burn fat, nor does insulin. If anything insulin would be anabolic to fat cells. Like I said, misleading, IMO.
-
11-28-2005, 11:49 PM #14Junior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 135
hahah winny 2 for strength lol
-
11-29-2005, 08:13 AM #15Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by Pinnacle
I liked alot of his ideas,not all.He was truly honest about ASS,not many people are at that level,he would not of lasted that long on this board,I can tell you that.A guy who truly believed in running very high does in a short period of time.And yes people think drol is very strong,I dont.It`s all about what you keep.I have to say this,I know somes guys who love drol because of the extra pint of blood in your body,great pumps,a feeling they like,no other ASS can quite do this.In this case,if this is your thing,I think drol is great.
goose4.............Last edited by goose; 11-29-2005 at 09:03 AM.
-
11-29-2005, 08:44 AM #16Originally Posted by goose4
-
11-29-2005, 08:56 AM #17
I can tell you ASS has cost me alot of money
-
11-29-2005, 10:24 AM #18Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by Pinnacle
One more point dude,if you run drol back to back in cycles,the second time you get very poor results with drol.With winny if you run it back to back,the results are almost identical,thats was dorian yates idelogy,to keep switching Compounds to fight this,not many people understand this here.
goose4..........
-
11-29-2005, 10:32 AM #19Originally Posted by goose4
I still disagree with you on the drol debate,but it's all good.We can't agree on everything my friend.
~Pinnacle~
-
11-29-2005, 11:03 AM #20Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by Pinnacle
I was very lucky to learn about switching Compounds early,I knew a guy who booked an appointment with dorian yates one on one.This is how he found this out,hence the information came my way.If you ever visit England you must book with him http://www.dorianyates.net/ He could even help you out on your Dbol only cycle.With drol,I see many people here,even high level BB that run it 50-100 mgs for 4 weeks,I`m not convinced it`s very effective even a waste,just a thought brother.
goose4.......
-
11-29-2005, 11:11 AM #21Originally Posted by goose4
-
11-29-2005, 11:20 AM #22
Damn, would you stop saying ass!
-
11-29-2005, 05:12 PM #23Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by Smiley619
http://www.steroid.com/Testosterone-Heptylate.php
goose4...................Last edited by goose; 11-29-2005 at 06:41 PM.
-
11-29-2005, 05:25 PM #24
Great thread.....interesting chart. I don't agree with it 100% but it is not too far off the mark.
Anadrol is great for temporary strength gains only.....so I see no reason for anyone to use it unless they are going to compete in a power lifting, strongman or Olympic lifting contest.....I have the same opinion about D-bol as well.
-
11-29-2005, 05:31 PM #25Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by Tyrone_Biggums
I agree with you 100% brother,Anadrol is great for strength gains.And lots of things wrong with the chart,great for a newbie,I truly think this site should do something like this,would help lots of chaps out.
goose4...........
-
11-29-2005, 05:36 PM #26Originally Posted by goose4
-
11-29-2005, 05:44 PM #27
abillity to keep anavar gains is 2! WTF!?!
i hate these charts, you can't trust any of them. who puts these together anyways?
-
11-29-2005, 05:50 PM #28Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by testosterona
Funney you said that,I thought that was the worst one,I ran Var at 100mgs on it`s own for 4 months and kept 14 after PCT,just lost 2.I think George Bush put this chart up.That`s why I really think this board should do are own chart,we would get it right. ----Hint MOD`S-------
goose4............
-
11-29-2005, 05:53 PM #29Originally Posted by goose4
-
11-29-2005, 06:01 PM #30Originally Posted by goose4
-
11-29-2005, 06:01 PM #31Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by JamesC
Good point.We have some smart Vets and Mods here,most of them.I think they would do a good job.
So james I want to put you to the test.What number would you give:
Winny for sides ?????
Test Sus for sides????
Test Sus ability to keep gains????
Viagra for hard on ??????
goose4................
-
11-30-2005, 03:55 PM #32Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Good point.We have some smart Vets and Mods here,most of them.I think they would do a good job.
So james I want to put you to the test.What number would you give:
Winny for sides ?????
Test Sus for sides????
Test Sus ability to keep gains????
Viagra for hard on ??????
goose4................
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
Yesterday, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS