Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    stupidhippo is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    somewhere
    Posts
    2,738

    test only cycle...

    Never done this but economically it would be cost effective.. So my question is in what way does a high dose test cycle ( 1.5G a week) lose to a stack like for example test/EQ (800/700). Also if some one can exlpain to me y the forst is considered a high dose when the second aint as much. At least many people have stated this. I understand the synergistic benefits of stacking and diffrent properties of different compunds but the total AAS concentration is a big factor also IMO. So test only cycles vs. stacking.. how much less effective they are?

  2. #2
    wolfyEVH's Avatar
    wolfyEVH is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,450
    Quote Originally Posted by stupidhippo
    Never done this but economically it would be cost effective.. So my question is in what way does a high dose test cycle ( 1.5G a week) lose to a stack like for example test/EQ (800/700). Also if some one can exlpain to me y the forst is considered a high dose when the second aint as much. At least many people have stated this. I understand the synergistic benefits of stacking and diffrent properties of different compunds but the total AAS concentration is a big factor also IMO. So test only cycles vs. stacking.. how much less effective they are?
    well that test/eq cycle isnt a small dose.........they're 2 different drugs.....you get less aromatization and less androgenic activity from the 2nd one, however personally, i'd rather do the first.

  3. #3
    stupidhippo is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    somewhere
    Posts
    2,738
    they r two diffrent drugs but with many similar effector mechanisms. U r right in the androgenic sides... But yeah wolfy.. how did u like test only cycle? Im really leaning towards it since the other options costs me more than ppl make here in a year ( a lil overexaggeration ) I live in a former soviet country and Im a student so Im not exactly swimming in money.. So in terms of cost effectiveness what u think ok the test only cycle.. I could even go maybe with sumin like 1.2 G of test a week for 12 weeks and kickstart it with adrol or dbol .

  4. #4
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline AR-Platinum Elite- Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    37,396
    Quote Originally Posted by stupidhippo
    Never done this but economically it would be cost effective.. So my question is in what way does a high dose test cycle ( 1.5G a week) lose to a stack like for example test/EQ (800/700). Also if some one can exlpain to me y the forst is considered a high dose when the second aint as much. At least many people have stated this. I understand the synergistic benefits of stacking and diffrent properties of different compunds but the total AAS concentration is a big factor also IMO. So test only cycles vs. stacking.. how much less effective they are?
    It all depends what you want out of a cycle and what your history is aswell, what are your past cycles?
    Test only looks fine at that mgs a week, you will experience good gains, the difference between the first and second is the benifit of the EQ...if it all depends on the cost just go with the cheapest, if you can afford more compounds and your ready to move up a level then go with that,,,

  5. #5
    QuieTSToRM33's Avatar
    QuieTSToRM33 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    S.Florida by way of NY
    Posts
    7,490
    i personally like the test/eq cycle ... but it depends solely on ur goals and what ur lookin to accomplish out of this cycle

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    867
    if you are looking to bulk up are test only cycles good and kick start the first 4-6 weeks wioth d ball?????

  7. #7
    PARABOLAN is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    72
    test only cycles have always worked for me, sometimes i think i dont need another compound

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    867
    Quote Originally Posted by PARABOLAN
    test only cycles have always worked for me, sometimes i think i dont need another compound
    i some times i cycle test with deca and some times test with equipose and some times test on its own!!!!! test on its own i gain the same i just kick start with d balls and test on its will become much cheaper!!!!!

  9. #9
    stupidhippo is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    somewhere
    Posts
    2,738
    thx ppl for ur replies... I will prolly go with test by itself at 1.2-1.5 G a week and see how it compares to my previous test/deca (700/400) cycle... It all comes down to cost effectiveness for me. Next summer I will have more money to invest and then I will go with tren / test etc...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •